2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How Do Nonsurgical Interventions Improve Pain and Physical Function in People With Osteoarthritis? A Scoping Review of Mediation Analysis Studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Nonsurgical interventions are recommended for osteoarthritis (OA). However, how interventions change pain and physical function is unclear. Therefore, the objectives of this scoping review were to 1) identify what potential mediators of nonsurgical interventions on pain and physical function have been evaluated and 2) summarize the findings according to intervention, joint, and outcome.

          Methods

          We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they conducted a mediation analysis on a randomized controlled trial evaluating a nonsurgical intervention on OA of any joint. Outcomes were pain and physical function.

          Results

          Nine knee OA studies, evaluating diet plus exercise, exercise, unloading shoes, high‐expectation communication during acupuncture, and telephone‐based weight loss plus exercise were identified. Except for weight loss and self‐efficacy, putative mediators (knee muscle perfusion/extensor strength/adduction moment, systemic inflammatory biomarkers, physical activity, dietary intake, and pain beliefs) were evaluated by single studies. Ten mediators partially mediated intervention (diet plus exercise, exercise, high‐expectation communication) effects on pain and physical function. Eight mediators were common to pain and function (reduced weight, increased knee extensor strength, and increased self‐efficacy). Constant knee flexor muscle perfusion partially mediated exercise effects on pain, and knee pain relief partially mediated exercise effects on function.

          Conclusion

          In knee OA, some evidence suggests that the benefits of 1) diet and exercise are mediated through changes in body weight, systemic inflammation, and self‐efficacy; 2) exercise is mediated through changes in knee muscle strength and self‐efficacy; and 3) high‐expectation communication style is mediated through changes in self‐efficacy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

              Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate. Results Researchers may conduct scoping reviews instead of systematic reviews where the purpose of the review is to identify knowledge gaps, scope a body of literature, clarify concepts or to investigate research conduct. While useful in their own right, scoping reviews may also be helpful precursors to systematic reviews and can be used to confirm the relevance of inclusion criteria and potential questions. Conclusions Scoping reviews are a useful tool in the ever increasing arsenal of evidence synthesis approaches. Although conducted for different purposes compared to systematic reviews, scoping reviews still require rigorous and transparent methods in their conduct to ensure that the results are trustworthy. Our hope is that with clear guidance available regarding whether to conduct a scoping review or a systematic review, there will be less scoping reviews being performed for inappropriate indications better served by a systematic review, and vice-versa.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                halm@unimelb.edu.au
                Journal
                Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
                Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2151-4658
                ACR
                Arthritis Care & Research
                Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Boston, USA )
                2151-464X
                2151-4658
                31 October 2022
                March 2023
                : 75
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/acr.v75.3 )
                : 467-481
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] The University of Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 2 ]Present address: Griffith University Queensland Australia
                [ 3 ] University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, and University of Newcastle Newcastle Australia
                [ 4 ] The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence via email to Michelle Hall, PhD, at halm@ 123456unimelb.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2024-4945
                Article
                ACR24983
                10.1002/acr.24983
                10952794
                35866717
                b8e0132b-d456-4ebe-bcec-479b0344949d
                © 2022 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 19 May 2022
                : 02 December 2021
                : 19 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 15, Words: 9346
                Funding
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council , doi 10.13039/501100000925;
                Award ID: 1126767
                Award ID: 1154217
                Award ID: 1172928
                Award ID: 1174431
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Defense , doi 10.13039/100000005;
                Award ID: W81XWH2010909
                Categories
                Original Article
                Osteoarthritis
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:20.03.2024

                Rheumatology
                Rheumatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article