78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distinct DNA Binding Sites Contribute to the TCF Transcriptional Switch in C. elegans and Drosophila

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regulation of gene expression by signaling pathways often occurs through a transcriptional switch, where the transcription factor responsible for signal-dependent gene activation represses the same targets in the absence of signaling. T-cell factors (TCFs) are transcription factors in the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, which control numerous cell fate specification events in metazoans. The TCF transcriptional switch is mediated by many co-regulators that contribute to repression or activation of Wnt target genes. It is typically assumed that DNA recognition by TCFs is important for target gene location, but plays no role in the actual switch. TCF/Pangolin (the fly TCF) and some vertebrate TCF isoforms bind DNA through two distinct domains, a High Mobility Group (HMG) domain and a C-clamp, which recognize DNA motifs known as HMG and Helper sites, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that POP-1 (the C. elegans TCF) also activates target genes through HMG and Helper site interactions. Helper sites enhanced the ability of a synthetic enhancer to detect Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in several tissues and revealed an unsuspected role for POP-1 in regulating the C. elegans defecation cycle. Searching for HMG-Helper site clusters allowed the identification of a new POP-1 target gene active in the head muscles and gut. While Helper sites and the C-clamp are essential for activation of worm and fly Wnt targets, they are dispensable for TCF-dependent repression of targets in the absence of Wnt signaling. These data suggest that a fundamental change in TCF-DNA binding contributes to the transcriptional switch that occurs upon Wnt stimulation.

          Author Summary

          The DNA of cells must be correctly “read” so that the proper genes are expressed. Transcription factors are the primary “DNA readers”, and these proteins bind to specific DNA sequences. Using nematodes as a model system, we investigated the rules of DNA binding for a particular transcription factor, called POP-1, which mediates Wnt signaling, an important cell-cell communication pathway. In addition to its known DNA binding site, we found that POP-1 recognizes additional sequences, termed Helper sites, which are essential for activation of Wnt targets. We used this knowledge to discover that Wnt signaling is active in pacemaker cells in the nematode intestine, which control defecation, a rhythmic behavior with parallels to the vertebrate heartbeat. POP-1 has a dual role in regulating Wnt targets, repressing target genes in the absence of signaling and activating them upon signal stimulation. Surprisingly, we found that Helper sites are only required for activation and not repression, and that this is also the case in the fruit fly Drosophila. This work thus reveals an unexpected complexity in POP-1 DNA binding, which is likely to be relevant for its human counterparts, which play important roles in stem cell biology and cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Wnt signaling in cancer.

          Aberrant regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a prevalent theme in cancer biology. From the earliest observation that Wnt overexpression could lead to malignant transformation of mouse mammary tissue to the most recent genetic discoveries gleaned from tumor genome sequencing, the Wnt pathway continues to evolve as a central mechanism in cancer biology. This article summarizes the evidence supporting a role for Wnt signaling in human cancer. This includes a review of the genetic mutations affecting Wnt pathway components, as well as some of epigenetic mechanisms that alter expression of genes relevant to Wnt. I also highlight some research on the cooperativity of Wnt with other signaling pathways in cancer. Finally, some emphasis is placed on laboratory research that provides a proof of concept for the therapeutic inhibition of Wnt signaling in cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Armadillo coactivates transcription driven by the product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene dTCF.

            The vertebrate transcription factors TCF (T cell factor) and LEF (lymphocyte enhancer binding factor) interact with beta-catenin and are hypothesized to mediate Wingless/Wnt signaling. We have cloned a maternally expressed Drosophila TCF family member, dTCF. dTCF binds a canonical TCF DNA motif and interacts with the beta-catenin homolog Armadillo. Previous studies have identified two regions in Armadillo required for Wingless signaling. One of these interacts with dTCF, while the other constitutes a transactivation domain. Mutations in dTCF and expression of a dominant-negative dTCF transgene cause a segment polarity phenotype and affect expression of the Wingless target genes engrailed and Ultrabithorax. Epistasis analysis positions dTCF downstream of armadillo. The Armadillo-dTCF complex mediates Wingless signaling as a bipartite transcription factor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple roles for activated LEF/TCF transcription complexes during hair follicle development and differentiation.

              LEF/TCF DNA-binding proteins act in concert with activated beta -catenin, the product of Wnt signaling, to transactivate downstream target genes. To probe the role of activated LEF/TCF transcription factor complexes in hair follicle morphogenesis and differentiation, we engineered mice harboring TOPGAL, a beta -galactosidase gene under the control of a LEF/TCF and beta -catenin inducible promoter. In mice, TOPGAL expression was directly stimulated by a stabilized form of beta -catenin, but was also dependent upon LEF1/TCF3 in skin. During embryogenesis, TOPGAL activation occurred transiently in a subset of LEF1-positive cells of pluripotent ectoderm and underlying mesenchyme. Downgrowth of initiated follicles proceeded in the absence of detectable TOPGAL expression, even though LEF1 was still expressed. While proliferative matrix cells expressed the highest levels of Lef1 mRNAs, LEF1 concentrated in the precursor cells to the hair shaft, where TOPGAL expression was co-induced with hair-specific keratin genes containing LEF/TCF-binding motifs. LEF1 and TOPGAL expression ceased during catagen and telogen, but reappeared at the start of the postnatal hair cycle, concomitant with precortex formation. In contrast to hair shaft precursor cells, postnatal outer root sheath expressed TCF3, but not TOPGAL. TCF3 was also expressed in the putative follicle stem cells, and while TOPGAL was generally silent in this compartment, it was stimulated at the start of the hair cycle in a fashion that appeared to be dependent upon stabilization of beta -catenin. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that LEF1/TCF3 is necessary but not sufficient for TOPGAL activation, revealing the existence of positive and negative regulators of these factors in the skin. Furthermore, our findings unveil the importance of activated LEF/TCF complexes at distinct times in hair development and cycling when changes in cell fate and differentiation commitments take place.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                February 2014
                6 February 2014
                : 10
                : 2
                : e1004133
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
                [2 ]Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India
                Harvard University, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CB AJR MVC HCK KMC. Performed the experiments: CB AJR MVC RAM MCB YXY KMC. Analyzed the data: CB AJR MVC RAM YXY HCK KMC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SPK. Wrote the paper: CB KMC.

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-13-01545
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1004133
                3916239
                24516405
                b9498749-a3f6-4efe-b53e-6c654b8fd66c
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 June 2013
                : 9 December 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Funding
                This work was supported by NSF grant 0950348 and NIH grant GM082994 to KMC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biochemistry
                Computational Biology
                Developmental Biology
                Genetics
                Animal Genetics

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article