39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III patients with sepsis-3: a machine learning approach using XGboost

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sepsis is a significant cause of mortality in-hospital, especially in ICU patients. Early prediction of sepsis is essential, as prompt and appropriate treatment can improve survival outcomes. Machine learning methods are flexible prediction algorithms with potential advantages over conventional regression and scoring system. The aims of this study were to develop a machine learning approach using XGboost to predict the 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III Patients with sepsis-3 and to determine whether such model performs better than traditional prediction models.

          Methods

          Using the MIMIC-III v1.4, we identified patients with sepsis-3. The data was split into two groups based on death or survival within 30 days and variables, selected based on clinical significance and availability by stepwise analysis, were displayed and compared between groups. Three predictive models including conventional logistic regression model, SAPS-II score prediction model and XGBoost algorithm model were constructed by R software. Then, the performances of the three models were tested and compared by AUCs of the receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curve analysis. At last, nomogram and clinical impact curve were used to validate the model.

          Results

          A total of 4559 sepsis-3 patients are included in the study, in which, 889 patients were death and 3670 survival within 30 days, respectively. According to the results of AUCs (0.819 [95% CI 0.800–0.838], 0.797 [95% CI 0.781–0.813] and 0.857 [95% CI 0.839–0.876]) and decision curve analysis for the three models, the XGboost model performs best. The risk nomogram and clinical impact curve verify that the XGboost model possesses significant predictive value.

          Conclusions

          Using machine learning technique by XGboost, more significant prediction model can be built. This XGboost model may prove clinically useful and assist clinicians in tailoring precise management and therapy for the patients with sepsis-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

              To develop and validate a new Simplified Acute Physiology Score, the SAPS II, from a large sample of surgical and medical patients, and to provide a method to convert the score to a probability of hospital mortality. The SAPS II and the probability of hospital mortality were developed and validated using data from consecutive admissions to 137 adult medical and/or surgical intensive care units in 12 countries. The 13,152 patients were randomly divided into developmental (65%) and validation (35%) samples. Patients younger than 18 years, burn patients, coronary care patients, and cardiac surgery patients were excluded. Vital status at hospital discharge. The SAPS II includes only 17 variables: 12 physiology variables, age, type of admission (scheduled surgical, unscheduled surgical, or medical), and three underlying disease variables (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, metastatic cancer, and hematologic malignancy). Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the model performed well in the developmental sample and validated well in an independent sample of patients (P = .883 and P = .104 in the developmental and validation samples, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 in the developmental sample and 0.86 in the validation sample. The SAPS II, based on a large international sample of patients, provides an estimate of the risk of death without having to specify a primary diagnosis. This is a starting point for future evaluation of the efficiency of intensive care units.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bs20m2l@leeds.ac.uk
                wanglinicu123@163.com
                wangkaiicu@163.com
                Journal
                J Transl Med
                J Transl Med
                Journal of Translational Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5876
                7 December 2020
                7 December 2020
                2020
                : 18
                : 462
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.477019.c, Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, , Shandong First Medical University, ; Zibo, 255036 Shandong China
                [2 ]Independent researcher, bs20m2l@leeds.ac.uk, Leeds, LS29JT UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.443573.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1799 2448, Institute of Medicine and Nursing, , Hubei University of Medicine, ; Shiyan, 442000 Hubei China
                [4 ]GRID grid.477019.c, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zibo Central Hospital, , Shandong First Medical University , ; Zibo, 255036 Shandong China
                [5 ]Fengnan District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Tangshan City, Tangshan, 063300 Hebei China
                [6 ]GRID grid.477019.c, Department of Urology Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, , Shandong First Medical University , ; Zibo, 255036 China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6369-8376
                Article
                2620
                10.1186/s12967-020-02620-5
                7720497
                33287854
                b9d38635-e73f-4488-8c7d-35315d74d9d8
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 28 August 2020
                : 18 November 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                mimic-iii,sepsis-3,machine learning,xgboost,logistic regression,saps-ii score
                Medicine
                mimic-iii, sepsis-3, machine learning, xgboost, logistic regression, saps-ii score

                Comments

                Comment on this article