7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genome editing for healthy crops: traits, tools and impacts

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crop cultivars in commercial use have often been selected because they show high levels of resistance to pathogens. However, widespread cultivation of these crops for many years in the environments favorable to a pathogen requires durable forms of resistance to maintain “healthy crops”. Breeding of new varieties tolerant/resistant to biotic stresses by incorporating genetic components related to durable resistance, developing new breeding methods and new active molecules, and improving the Integrated Pest Management strategies have been of great value, but their effectiveness is being challenged by the newly emerging diseases and the rapid change of pathogens due to climatic changes. Genome editing has provided new tools and methods to characterize defense-related genes in crops and improve crop resilience to disease pathogens providing improved food security and future sustainable agricultural systems. In this review, we discuss the principal traits, tools and impacts of utilizing genome editing techniques for achieving of durable resilience and a “healthy plants” concept.

          Related collections

          Most cited references202

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The plant immune system.

          Many plant-associated microbes are pathogens that impair plant growth and reproduction. Plants respond to infection using a two-branched innate immune system. The first branch recognizes and responds to molecules common to many classes of microbes, including non-pathogens. The second responds to pathogen virulence factors, either directly or through their effects on host targets. These plant immune systems, and the pathogen molecules to which they respond, provide extraordinary insights into molecular recognition, cell biology and evolution across biological kingdoms. A detailed understanding of plant immune function will underpin crop improvement for food, fibre and biofuels production.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression.

            Targeted gene regulation on a genome-wide scale is a powerful strategy for interrogating, perturbing, and engineering cellular systems. Here, we develop a method for controlling gene expression based on Cas9, an RNA-guided DNA endonuclease from a type II CRISPR system. We show that a catalytically dead Cas9 lacking endonuclease activity, when coexpressed with a guide RNA, generates a DNA recognition complex that can specifically interfere with transcriptional elongation, RNA polymerase binding, or transcription factor binding. This system, which we call CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), can efficiently repress expression of targeted genes in Escherichia coli, with no detectable off-target effects. CRISPRi can be used to repress multiple target genes simultaneously, and its effects are reversible. We also show evidence that the system can be adapted for gene repression in mammalian cells. This RNA-guided DNA recognition platform provides a simple approach for selectively perturbing gene expression on a genome-wide scale. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops

              Crop pathogens and pests reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. They cause substantial economic losses and reduce food security at household, national and global levels. Quantitative, standardized information on crop losses is difficult to compile and compare across crops, agroecosystems and regions. Here, we report on an expert-based assessment of crop health, and provide numerical estimates of yield losses on an individual pathogen and pest basis for five major crops globally and in food security hotspots. Our results document losses associated with 137 pathogens and pests associated with wheat, rice, maize, potato and soybean worldwide. Our yield loss (range) estimates at a global level and per hotspot for wheat (21.5% (10.1-28.1%)), rice (30.0% (24.6-40.9%)), maize (22.5% (19.5-41.1%)), potato (17.2% (8.1-21.0%)) and soybean (21.4% (11.0-32.4%)) suggest that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations, and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases. Our assessment highlights differences in impacts among crop pathogens and pests and among food security hotspots. This analysis contributes critical information to prioritize crop health management to improve the sustainability of agroecosystems in delivering services to societies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                27 October 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1231013
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University , Samsun, Türkiye
                [2] 2 Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of Republic of Serbia , Novi Sad, Serbia
                [3] 3 Sweet Environmental Consultants , Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [4] 4 Department of Horticulture, Iğdır University , Iğdır, Türkiye
                [5] 5 Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment (ILFE), University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad, Serbia
                [6] 6 Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University , Samsun, Türkiye
                [7] 7 National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), I.P. , Oeiras, Portugal
                [8] 8 GREEN-IT Bioresources for Sustainability, ITQB NOVA , Oeiras, Portugal
                Author notes

                Edited by: Baohong Zhang, East Carolina University, United States

                Reviewed by: Mohd Fadhli Hamdan, University of Malaya, Malaysia; Siddanna Savadi, Directorate of Cashew Research (ICAR), India

                *Correspondence: Dragana Miladinović, dragana.miladinovic@ 123456ifvcns.ns.ac.rs
                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2023.1231013
                10641503
                ba4288d5-61bf-462d-a548-30e874edc5c7
                Copyright © 2023 Yıldırım, Miladinović, Sweet, Akin, Galović, Kavas, Zlatković and de Andrade

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 May 2023
                : 09 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 202, Pages: 19, Words: 10972
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja , doi 10.13039/501100004564;
                Funded by: Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja , doi 10.13039/501100004564;
                Funded by: Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia , doi 10.13039/501100016047;
                Funded by: European Commission , doi 10.13039/501100000780;
                Funded by: European Commission , doi 10.13039/501100000780;
                DM acknowledges funding by the Science, Technological Development, and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia, grant number 451-03-47/2023-01/200032, by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia through IDEAS project “Creating climate smart sunflower for future challenges” (SMARTSUN), grant number 7732457, by the European Commission through Twinning Western Balkans project CROPINNO, grant number 101059784. VG and MZ acknowledge funding from the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (contract no. 451-03-47/2023-01/200197). EA acknowledges funding from GREEN-IT Bioresources for Sustainability, ITQB NOVA, Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal. This article is based upon work from COST Action PlantEd (CA18111), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). www.cost.eu.
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Plant Biotechnology

                Plant science & Botany
                crispr,crops,crop improvement,pathogens,resilience,durable resistance,fungal, bacterial and virus infections,parasitic weeds

                Comments

                Comment on this article