7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for 18F-NaF bone PET/CT images acquired over shorter durations using a custom-designed phantom

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithm Q.Clear (GE Healthcare) allows fully convergent iterative reconstruction that results in better image quality and quantitative accuracy, while limiting image noise. The present study aimed to optimize BPL reconstruction parameters for 18F-NaF PET/CT images and to determine the feasibility of 18F-NaF PET/CT image acquisition over shorter durations in clinical practice.

          Methods

          A custom-designed thoracic spine phantom consisting of several inserts, soft tissue, normal spine, and metastatic bone tumor, was scanned using a Discovery MI PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare). The phantom allows optional adjustment of activity distribution, tumor size, and attenuation. We reconstructed PET images using OSEM + PSF + TOF (2 iterations, 17 subsets, and a 4-mm Gaussian filter), BPL + TOF (β = 200 to 700), and scan durations of 30–120 s. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), contrast, and coefficients of variance (CV) as image quality indicators were calculated, whereas the quantitative measures were recovery coefficients (RC) and RC linearity over a range of activity. We retrospectively analyzed images from five persons without bone metastases (male, n = 1; female, n = 4), then standardized uptake values (SUV), CV, and SNR at the 4th, 5th, and 6th thoracic vertebra were calculated in BPL + TOF (β = 400) images.

          Results

          The optimal reconstruction parameter of the BPL was β = 400 when images were acquired at 120 s/bed. At 90 s/bed, the BPL with a β value of 400 yielded 24% and 18% higher SNR and contrast, respectively, than OSEM (2 iterations; 120 s acquisitions). The BPL was superior to OSEM in terms of RC and the RC linearity over a range of activity, regardless of scan duration. The SUV max were lower in BPL, than in OSEM. The CV and vertebral SNR in BPL were superior to those in OSEM.

          Conclusions

          The optimal reconstruction parameters of 18F-NaF PET/CT images acquired over different durations were determined. The BPL can reduce PET acquisition to 90 s/bed in 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging. Our results suggest that BPL (β = 400) on SiPM-based TOF PET/CT scanner maintained high image quality and quantitative accuracy even for shorter acquisition durations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier-Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System.

          This article presents system performance studies for the Discovery MI PET/CT system, a new time-of-flight system based on silicon photomultipliers. System performance and clinical imaging were compared between this next-generation system and other commercially available PET/CT and PET/MR systems, as well as between different reconstruction algorithms.Methods:Spatial resolution, sensitivity, noise-equivalent counting rate, scatter fraction, counting rate accuracy, and image quality were characterized with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-2 2012 standards. Energy resolution and coincidence time resolution were measured. Tests were conducted independently on two Discovery MI scanners installed at Stanford University and Uppsala University, and the results were averaged. Back-to-back patient scans were also performed between the Discovery MI, Discovery 690 PET/CT, and SIGNA PET/MR systems. Clinical images were reconstructed using both ordered-subset expectation maximization and Q.Clear (block-sequential regularized expectation maximization with point-spread function modeling) and were examined qualitatively.Results:The averaged full widths at half maximum (FWHMs) of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution reconstructed with filtered backprojection at 1, 10, and 20 cm from the system center were, respectively, 4.10/4.19/4.48 mm, 5.47/4.49/6.01 mm, and 7.53/4.90/6.10 mm. The averaged sensitivity was 13.7 cps/kBq at the center of the field of view. The averaged peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 193.4 kcps at 21.9 kBq/mL, with a scatter fraction of 40.6%. The averaged contrast recovery coefficients for the image-quality phantom were 53.7, 64.0, 73.1, 82.7, 86.8, and 90.7 for the 10-, 13-, 17-, 22-, 28-, and 37-mm-diameter spheres, respectively. The average photopeak energy resolution was 9.40% FWHM, and the average coincidence time resolution was 375.4 ps FWHM. Clinical image comparisons between the PET/CT systems demonstrated the high quality of the Discovery MI. Comparisons between the Discovery MI and SIGNA showed a similar spatial resolution and overall imaging performance. Lastly, the results indicated significantly enhanced image quality and contrast-to-noise performance for Q.Clear, compared with ordered-subset expectation maximization.Conclusion:Excellent performance was achieved with the Discovery MI, including 375 ps FWHM coincidence time resolution and sensitivity of 14 cps/kBq. Comparisons between reconstruction algorithms and other multimodal silicon photomultiplier and non-silicon photomultiplier PET detector system designs indicated that performance can be substantially enhanced with this next-generation system.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.

            Q.Clear, a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm for PET, was recently introduced by GE Healthcare on their PET scanners to improve clinical image quality and quantification. In this work, we determined the optimum penalization factor (beta) for clinical use of Q.Clear and compared Q.Clear with standard PET reconstructions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.

              The Clinical Trials Network (CTN) of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) operates a PET/CT phantom imaging program using the CTN's oncology clinical simulator phantom, designed to validate scanners at sites that wish to participate in oncology clinical trials. Since its inception in 2008, the CTN has collected 406 well-characterized phantom datasets from 237 scanners at 170 imaging sites covering the spectrum of commercially available PET/CT systems. The combined and collated phantom data describe a global profile of quantitative performance and variability of PET/CT data used in both clinical practice and clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kenta5710@gmail.com
                Journal
                EJNMMI Phys
                EJNMMI Phys
                EJNMMI Physics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2197-7364
                11 September 2020
                11 September 2020
                December 2020
                : 7
                : 56
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411731.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0531 3030, Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Science, , International University of Health and Welfare, ; 2600-1 Kitakanemaru, Ohtawara, Tochigi, 324-8501 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.471467.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0449 2946, Department of Radiology, , Fukushima Medical University Hospital, ; 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, Fukushima 960-1247 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.420122.7, ISNI 0000 0000 9337 2516, Research Team for Neuroimaging, , Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, ; 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015 Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.417241.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1772 7556, Department of Radiology, , Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, ; 50, Aza Hachiken Nishi, Aotake-Cho, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8570 Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.410807.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0037 4131, Department of Nuclear Medicine, , Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, ; 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550 Japan
                [6 ]GRID grid.417092.9, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, ; 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015 Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0802-0180
                Article
                325
                10.1186/s40658-020-00325-8
                7486353
                32915344
                ba5a623b-5919-4984-9ca2-a3e46599486a
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 May 2020
                : 3 September 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                q.clear,quantitation,18f-naf,sipm,bpl,tof
                q.clear, quantitation, 18f-naf, sipm, bpl, tof

                Comments

                Comment on this article