7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cross-cultural similarity in relationship-specific social touching

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many species use touching for reinforcing social structures, and particularly, non-human primates use social grooming for managing their social networks. However, it is still unclear how social touch contributes to the maintenance and reinforcement of human social networks. Human studies in Western cultures suggest that the body locations where touch is allowed are associated with the strength of the emotional bond between the person touched and the toucher. However, it is unknown to what extent this relationship is culturally universal and generalizes to non-Western cultures. Here, we compared relationship-specific, bodily touch allowance maps across one Western ( N = 386, UK) and one East Asian ( N = 255, Japan) country. In both cultures, the strength of the emotional bond was linearly associated with permissible touch area. However, Western participants experienced social touching as more pleasurable than Asian participants. These results indicate a similarity of emotional bonding via social touch between East Asian and Western cultures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lending a hand: social regulation of the neural response to threat.

          Social contact promotes enhanced health and well-being, likely as a function of the social regulation of emotional responding in the face of various life stressors. For this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, 16 married women were subjected to the threat of electric shock while holding their husband's hand, the hand of an anonymous male experimenter, or no hand at all. Results indicated a pervasive attenuation of activation in the neural systems supporting emotional and behavioral threat responses when the women held their husband's hand. A more limited attenuation of activation in these systems occurred when they held the hand of a stranger. Most strikingly, the effects of spousal hand-holding on neural threat responses varied as a function of marital quality, with higher marital quality predicting less threat-related neural activation in the right anterior insula, superior frontal gyrus, and hypothalamus during spousal, but not stranger, hand-holding.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms.

            R. Dunbar (2010)
            Grooming is a widespread activity throughout the animal kingdom, but in primates (including humans) social grooming, or allo-grooming (the grooming of others), plays a particularly important role in social bonding which, in turn, has a major impact on an individual's lifetime reproductive fitness. New evidence from comparative brain analyses suggests that primates have social relationships of a qualitatively different kind to those found in other animal species, and I suggest that, in primates, social grooming has acquired a new function of supporting these. I review the evidence for a neuropeptide basis for social bonding, and draw attention to the fact that the neuroendrocrine pathways involved are quite unresolved. Despite recent claims for the central importance of oxytocin, there is equally good, but invariably ignored, evidence for a role for endorphins. I suggest that these two neuropeptide families may play different roles in the processes of social bonding in primates and non-primates, and that more experimental work will be needed to tease them apart.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cultural variation in affect valuation.

              The authors propose that how people want to feel ("ideal affect") differs from how they actually feel ("actual affect") and that cultural factors influence ideal more than actual affect. In 2 studies, controlling for actual affect, the authors found that European American (EA) and Asian American (AA) individuals value high-arousal positive affect (e.g., excitement) more than do Hong Kong Chinese (CH). On the other hand, CH and AA individuals value low-arousal positive affect (e.g., calm) more than do EA individuals. For all groups, the discrepancy between ideal and actual affect correlates with depression. These findings illustrate the distinctiveness of ideal and actual affect, show that culture influences ideal affect more than actual affect, and indicate that both play a role in mental health. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Biol Sci
                Proc. Biol. Sci
                RSPB
                royprsb
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                24 April 2019
                24 April 2019
                24 April 2019
                : 286
                : 1901
                : 20190467
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University , Espoo, Finland
                [2 ]Department of Computer Science, Aalto University , Espoo, Finland
                [3 ]Department of Art, Aalto University , Espoo, Finland
                [4 ]Turku PET Centre, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, University of Turku , Turku, Finland
                [6 ]Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University , Hiroshima, Japan
                [7 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [8 ]Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences , Leipzig, Germany
                [9 ]National Institute for Physiological Sciences , Okazaki, Japan
                [10 ]Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University , 14 Nanyang Avenue, 637332 Singapore
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4464836.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-9757
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9982-9702
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-4033
                Article
                rspb20190467
                10.1098/rspb.2019.0467
                6501924
                31014213
                bd4c8574-8de2-4e22-9629-7fd7506ec1ce
                © 2019 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 February 2019
                : 4 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001700;
                Funded by: Emil Aaltosen Säätiö, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004756;
                Funded by: Alfred Kordelinin Säätiö, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008969;
                Award ID: #294897
                Funded by: European Research Council;
                Award ID: #313000
                Funded by: Suomen Akatemia, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002341;
                Funded by: Nanyang Technological University, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001475;
                Funded by: Academy of Finland grant;
                Award ID: #294897
                Funded by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691;
                Award ID: 26244031; 15H01846; 16H01680; 25135734
                Categories
                1001
                14
                70
                133
                Behaviour
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                April 24, 2019

                Life sciences
                social touch,cultural differences,emotion,bonding
                Life sciences
                social touch, cultural differences, emotion, bonding

                Comments

                Comment on this article