0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unbiased analysis of the dorsal root ganglion after peripheral nerve injury: no neuronal loss, no gliosis, but satellite glial cell plasticity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

          Deep learning-based analysis of large-scale bioimages of the dorsal root ganglion after nerve injury reveals satellite glial cell plasticity but no loss of sensory neurons.

          Abstract

          Pain syndromes are often accompanied by complex molecular and cellular changes in dorsal root ganglia (DRG). However, the evaluation of cellular plasticity in the DRG is often performed by heuristic manual analysis of a small number of representative microscopy image fields. In this study, we introduce a deep learning–based strategy for objective and unbiased analysis of neurons and satellite glial cells (SGCs) in the DRG. To validate the approach experimentally, we examined serial sections of the rat DRG after spared nerve injury (SNI) or sham surgery. Sections were stained for neurofilament, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and glutamine synthetase (GS) and imaged using high-resolution large-field (tile) microscopy. After training of deep learning models on consensus information of different experts, thousands of image features in DRG sections were analyzed. We used known (GFAP upregulation), controversial (neuronal loss), and novel (SGC phenotype switch) changes to evaluate the method. In our data, the number of DRG neurons was similar 14 d after SNI vs sham. In GFAP-positive subareas, the percentage of neurons in proximity to GFAP-positive cells increased after SNI. In contrast, GS-positive signals, and the percentage of neurons in proximity to GS-positive SGCs decreased after SNI. Changes in GS and GFAP levels could be linked to specific DRG neuron subgroups of different size. Hence, we could not detect gliosis but plasticity changes in the SGC marker expression. Our objective analysis of DRG tissue after peripheral nerve injury shows cellular plasticity responses of SGCs in the whole DRG but neither injury-induced neuronal death nor gliosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis

          For the past twenty five years the NIH family of imaging software, NIH Image and ImageJ have been pioneers as open tools for scientific image analysis. We discuss the origins, challenges and solutions of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Animal models of necrotizing enterocolitis: review of the literature and state of the art

            Abstract Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains the leading cause of gastrointestinal surgical emergency in preterm neonates. Over the last five decades, a variety of experimental models have been developed to study the pathophysiology of this disease and to test the effectiveness of novel therapeutic strategies. Experimental NEC is mainly modeled in neonatal rats, mice and piglets. In this review, we focus on these experimental models and discuss the major advantages and disadvantages of each. We also briefly discuss other models that are not as widely used but have contributed to our current knowledge of NEC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw

              We applied and validated a quantitative allodynia assessment technique, using a recently developed rat surgical neuropathy model wherein nocifensive behaviors are evoked by light touch to the paw. Employing von Frey hairs from 0.41 to 15.1 g, we first characterized the percent response at each stimulus intensity. A smooth log-linear relationship was observed, with a median 50% threshold at 1.97 g (95% confidence limits, 1.12-3.57 g). Subsequently, we applied a paradigm using stimulus oscillation around the response threshold, which allowed more rapid, efficient measurements. Median 50% threshold by this up-down method was 2.4 g (1.81-2.76). Correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.91. In neuropathic rats, good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was found for the up-down paradigm; some variability was seen in normal rats, attributable to extensive testing. Thresholds in a sizable group of neuropathic rats showed insignificant variability over 20 days. After 50 days, 61% still met strict neuropathy criteria, using survival analysis. Threshold measurement using the up-down paradigm, in combination with the neuropathic pain model, represents a powerful tool for analyzing the effects of manipulations of the neuropathic pain state.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pain
                Pain
                JPAIN
                JOP
                Pain
                Wolters Kluwer (Philadelphia, PA )
                0304-3959
                1872-6623
                April 2023
                15 August 2022
                : 164
                : 4
                : 728-740
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                [b ]Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                [c ]Institute of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Address: Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Center for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 931 201-30251; fax: +49 931 201-30259. E-mail address: Rittner_H@ 123456ukw.de (H. Rittner).
                Article
                PAIN-D-22-00557 00008
                10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002758
                10026836
                35969236
                bf135c93-522a-4824-9653-0bdc47dfc60d
                Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 04 June 2022
                : 13 July 2022
                : 26 July 2022
                Categories
                Research Paper
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                dorsal root ganglia,satellite glial cell activation,bioimage segmentation,deep learning,neuropathic pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article