6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Integration of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support and Disaster Risk Reduction: A Mapping and Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The field of disaster and emergency management has shifted in focus towards the goal of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). However, the degree to which the Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) field has followed this trend is relatively unknown. Therefore, the objectives of this review were to identify relevant projects, materials, and publications relating to MHPSS and DRR integration and define current domains of action in this integration. A review was conducted using a two-pronged approach for data collection. This approach included 1) a mapping exercise eliciting relevant documentation and project descriptions from MHPSS actors, and 2) a database and internet literature search. The mapping exercise was conducted between January and November 2019, while the literature search was completed in March 2019. The majority of identified materials concerned actions of capacity and systems building; preparedness; policy development, consensus building, and awareness raising; school- and child-focused DRR; inclusive DRR; and resilience promotion. Results also suggested that relatively little consensus exists in terms of formal definitions of and frameworks or guidance for integrating MHPSS and DRR. Moreover, domains of action varied in terms of current implementation practices and empirical evidence. Materials and projects are reviewed and discussed in terms of implications for advancing the integration of DRR and MHPSS and expanding MHPSS approaches to include building better before emergencies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Writing narrative literature reviews.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effectiveness of psychological first aid as a disaster intervention tool: research analysis of peer-reviewed literature from 1990-2010.

              The Advisory Council of the American Red Cross Disaster Services requested that an independent study determine whether first-aid providers without professional mental health training, when confronted with people who have experienced a traumatic event, offer a "safe, effective and feasible intervention." Standard databases were searched by an expert panel from 1990 to September 2010 using the keyword phrase "psychological first aid." Documents were included if the process was referred to as care provided to victims, first responders, or volunteers and excluded if it was not associated with a disaster or mass casualty event, or was used after individual nondisaster traumas such as rape and murder. This search yielded 58 citations. It was determined that adequate scientific evidence for psychological first aid is lacking but widely supported by expert opinion and rational conjecture. No controlled studies were found. There is insufficient evidence supporting a treatment standard or a treatment guideline. Sufficient evidence for psychological first aid is widely supported by available objective observations and expert opinion and best fits the category of "evidence informed" but without proof of effectiveness. An intervention provided by volunteers without professional mental health training for people who have experienced a traumatic event offers an acceptable option. Further outcome research is recommended.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                14 March 2020
                March 2020
                : 17
                : 6
                : 1900
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
                [2 ]Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland; hannaf@ 123456who.int
                [3 ]Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia; l.reifels@ 123456unimelb.edu.au
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: brandon.gray@ 123456uvm.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-0840
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7844-5163
                Article
                ijerph-17-01900
                10.3390/ijerph17061900
                7142938
                32183382
                c0e5fbef-cdcf-43b5-a84e-f09b755bf316
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 February 2020
                : 09 March 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                mental health and psychosocial support,disaster mental health,disaster risk reduction,disaster risk management

                Comments

                Comment on this article