1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery predicts long-term outcome after hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been proved to improve postoperative outcome for many surgical procedures, including liver resection. There was limited evidence regarding the feasibility and benefit of ERAS in patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma.

          AIM

          To evaluate the feasibility of ERAS in patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma and its association with patient outcomes.

          METHODS

          We retrospectively analyzed 116 cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University between January 2015 and December 2016. The primary outcome was the compliance with ERAS. To determine the association between ERAS compliance and patient outcomes. the patients were categorized into those adhering more than and equal to 50% (ERAS ≥ 50), and below 50% (ERAS < 50) of all components. Details on type of surgical procedure, preoperative and postoperative care, tumor location, postoperative laboratory results, and survival time were evaluated. The compliance with ERAS was measured by the percentage of ERAS items achieved. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used for survival analysis.

          RESULTS

          The median percentage of ERAS goals achieved was 40% (± 12%). Fourteen patients (12.1%) were categorized into the ERAS ≥ 50 group, and 102 patients were in the ERAS < 50 group. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS ≥ 50 group [8.9 d, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-10.4 d] than in the ERAS < 50 group (13.7 d, 95%CI: 12.2-15.2 d) ( P = 0.0217). No hepatobiliary-related complications or in-hospital mortality occurred in the ERAS ≥ 50 group. Overall survival was significantly higher in the ERAS ≥ 50 group. The median survival of the patients in the ERAS < 50 group was 1257 d (95%CI: 853.2-1660.8 d), whereas that of the patients in the ERAS ≥ 50 group was not reached.

          CONCLUSION

          Overall ERAS compliance for patients who underwent liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma is poor. Greater ERAS compliance could predict in-hospital, short-term, and long-term outcomes of the patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

          Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway developed to overcome the deleterious effect of perioperative stress after major surgery. In colorectal surgery, ERAS pathways reduced perioperative morbidity, hospital stay and costs. Similar concept should be applied for liver surgery. This study presents the specific ERAS Society recommendations for liver surgery based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathogenesis and classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: different characters of perihilar large duct type versus peripheral small duct type.

            Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) are made up of heterogenous carcinomas arising from different anatomical sites of the liver. Two types of candidate stem/progenitor cells of the biliary tree are postulated to exist at the peribiliary glands for large bile ducts and at the canals of Hering for small ducts and hepatocytes. According to the recent observations, ICCs can be subclassified into two types: tumors involving the large bile ducts comparable in size to the intrahepatic second branches and composed of a tubular or papillary component with tall columnar epithelium, and tumors involving the smaller duct than segmental branches and composed of small tubules with cuboidal epithelium. Perihilar large duct type ICCs can be interpreted as arising from large bile duct type ICCs, and peripheral small duct type ICCs may arise from small bile duct type or ductular type ICCs. Chronic biliary inflammation induces neoplastic change of the large bile ducts and thereby progression to the perihilar large duct type ICC, which can be grossly classified into periductal filtrating type ICC and intraductal growth type ICC, while chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis induces mass-forming peripheral small duct type ICC. The different morphological and molecular features, including stromal components and tumor vasculature, support the hypothesis that perihilar large duct type ICCs and peripheral small duct type ICCs arise from different backgrounds, have different carcinogenetic pathways, and exhibit different biologic behaviors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Costs and Improve Clinical Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Abstracts Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based, multimodal and patient-centred approach to optimize patient care and experience during their perioperative pathway. It has been shown to be effective in reducing length of hospital stay and improving clinical outcomes. However, evidence on its effective in liver surgery remains weak. The aim of this review is to investigate clinical benefits, cost-effectiveness and compliance to ERAS protocols in liver surgery. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane for randomized control trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published between 2008 and 2019, comparing effect of ERAS protocols and standard care on hospital cost, LOS, complications, readmission, mortality and compliance. Results The search resulted in 6 RCTs and 21 cohort studies of 3739 patients (1777 in ERAS and 1962 in standard care group). LOS was reduced by 2.22 days in ERAS group (MD = −2.22; CI, −2.77 to −1.68; p < 0.00001) compared to the standard care group. Fewer patients in ERAS group experienced complications (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65–0.77; p = < 0.00001). Hospital cost was significantly lower in the ERAS group (SMD = −0.98; CI, −1.37 to – 0.58; p < 0.0001). Conclusion Our review concluded that the introduction of ERAS protocols is safe and feasible in hepatectomies, without increasing mortality and readmission rates, whilst reducing LOS and risk of complications, and with a significant hospital cost savings. Laparoscopic approach may be necessary to reduce complication rates in liver surgery. However, further studies are needed to investigate overall compliance to ERAS protocols and its impact on clinical outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastrointest Surg
                WJGS
                World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1948-9366
                27 March 2023
                27 March 2023
                : 15
                : 3
                : 362-373
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. vor_110@ 123456yahoo.com
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Saraburi Hospital, Saraburi 18000, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
                Author notes

                Author contributions: All the authors contributed to this paper.

                Supported by the grant of Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, No. IN62330.

                Corresponding author: Vor Luvira, FRCS (Gen Surg), MD, Associate Professor, Doctor, Surgical Oncologist, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Mittraphap Road, Muang Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. vor_110@ 123456yahoo.com

                Article
                jWJGS.v15.i3.pg362
                10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.362
                10080603
                37032797
                c1dab86d-d7cc-42ce-988c-03678d509f08
                ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 18 November 2022
                : 9 December 2022
                : 27 February 2023
                Categories
                Retrospective Cohort Study

                enhanced recovery program after surgery,cholangiocarcinoma,hepatectomy,survival,enhanced recovery after surgery,outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article