Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transplant Tolerance Induction in Newborn Infants: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Potential Strategies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although several tolerance induction protocols have been successfully implemented in adult renal transplantation, no tolerance induction approach has, as yet, been defined for solid organ transplantations in young infants. Pediatric transplant recipients have a pressing demand for the elaboration of tolerance induction regimens. Indeed, since they display a longer survival time, they are exposed to a higher level of risks linked to long-term immunosuppression (IS) and to chronic rejection. Interestingly, central tolerance induction may be of great interest in newborns, because of their immunological immaturity and the important role of the thymus at this early stage in life. The present review aims to clarify mechanisms and strategies of tolerance induction in these immunologically premature recipients. We first introduce the discovery and mechanisms of neonatal tolerance in murine experimental models and subsequently analyze tolerance induction in human newborn infants. Hematopoietic mixed chimerism in neonates is also discussed based on in utero hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplant studies. Then, we review the recent advances in tolerance induction approaches in adults, including the infusion of HSCs associated with less toxic conditioning regimens, regulatory T cells/facilitating cells/mesenchymal stem cells transplantation, costimulatory blockade, and thymus manipulation. Finally, IS withdrawal in pediatric solid organ transplant is discussed. In conclusion, the establishment of transplant tolerance induction in infants is promising and deserves further investigations. Future studies could focus on the selection of patients, on less toxic conditioning regimens, and on biomarkers for IS minimization or withdrawal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references148

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep.

            Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent cells that can be isolated from adult bone marrow and can be induced in vitro and in vivo to differentiate into a variety of mesenchymal tissues, including bone, cartilage, tendon, fat, bone marrow stroma, and muscle. Despite their potential clinical utility for cellular and gene therapy, the fate of mesenchymal stem cells after systemic administration is mostly unknown. To address this, we transplanted a well-characterized human mesenchymal stem cell population into fetal sheep early in gestation, before and after the expected development of immunologic competence. In this xenogeneic system, human mesenchymal stem cells engrafted and persisted in multiple tissues for as long as 13 months after transplantation. Transplanted human cells underwent site-specific differentiation into chondrocytes, adipocytes, myocytes and cardiomyocytes, bone marrow stromal cells and thymic stroma. Unexpectedly, there was long-term engraftment even when cells were transplanted after the expected development of immunocompetence. Thus, mesenchymal stem cells maintain their multipotential capacity after transplantation, and seem to have unique immunologic characteristics that allow persistence in a xenogeneic environment. Our data support the possibility of the transplantability of mesenchymal stem cells and their potential utility in tissue engineering, and cellular and gene therapy applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of allograft rejection after renal transplantation: results of a phase I study.

              Despite excellent short-term results, long-term survival of transplanted kidneys has not improved accordingly. Although alloimmune responses and calcineurin inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity have been identified as main drivers of fibrosis, no effective treatment options have emerged. In this perspective, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an interesting candidate because of their immunosuppressive and regenerative properties. Of importance, no other clinical studies have investigated their effects in allograft rejection and fibrosis. We performed a safety and feasibility study in kidney allograft recipients to whom two intravenous infusions (1 million cells per kilogram) of autologous bone marrow (BM) MSCs were given, when a protocol renal biopsy at 4 weeks or 6 months showed signs of rejection and/or an increase in interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Six patients received MSC infusions. Clinical and immune monitoring was performed up to 24 weeks after MSC infusions. MSCs fulfilled the release criteria, infusions were well-tolerated, and no treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. In two recipients with allograft rejection, we had a clinical indication to perform surveillance biopsies and are able to report on the potential effects of MSCs in rejection. Although maintenance immunosuppression remained unaltered, there was a resolution of tubulitis without IF/TA in both patients. Additionally, three patients developed an opportunistic viral infection, and five of the six patients displayed a donor-specific downregulation of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation assay, not reported in patients without MSC treatment. Autologous BM MSC treatment in transplant recipients with subclinical rejection and IF/TA is clinically feasible and safe, and the findings are suggestive of systemic immunosuppression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                07 April 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 116
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Chair of Transplantation, VetAgro Sup-Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon , Marcy l’Etoile, France
                [2] 2Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University , Xi’an, China
                [3] 3Department of Hand Surgery, Clinique du Parc , Lyon, France
                [4] 4Department of Transplantation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot , Lyon, France
                [5] 5International Center for Infectiology Research (CIRI), Université de Lyon , Lyon, France
                [6] 6Cancer Research Center Lyon (CRCL), UMR INSERM 1052 CNRS 5286, Centre Leon Berard , Lyon, France
                [7] 7Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud , Pierre Benite, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Song Guo Zheng, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, USA

                Reviewed by: Bruce Milne Hall, University of New South Wales, Australia; Bin Li, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

                *Correspondence: Marie-Cécile Michallet, marie-cecile.michallet@ 123456lyon.unicancer.fr ; Mauricette Michallet, mauricette.michallet@ 123456chu-lyon.fr

                Marie-Cécile Michallet and Mauricette Michallet are co-last authors.

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Immunological Tolerance, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2016.00116
                4823304
                27092138
                c325276a-b961-42ab-b315-99c83aa0e918
                Copyright © 2016 Pan, Gazarian, Dubernard, Belot, Michallet and Michallet.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 November 2015
                : 14 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 161, Pages: 16, Words: 15237
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondation Mérieux
                Funded by: Fondation Bullukian
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 30901365
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                transplantation,tolerance induction,infants,chimerism,stem cells
                Immunology
                transplantation, tolerance induction, infants, chimerism, stem cells

                Comments

                Comment on this article