Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Propensity score methods have become a popular tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies in medical research. Propensity score matching, a key component of propensity score methods, normally matches units based on the distance between point estimates of the propensity scores. The problem with this technique is that it is difficult to establish a sensible criterion to evaluate the closeness of matched units without knowing estimation errors of the propensity scores.

          Methods

          The present study introduces interval matching using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores. In interval matching, if the confidence interval of a unit in the treatment group overlaps with that of one or more units in the comparison group, they are considered as matched units.

          Results

          The procedure of interval matching is illustrated in an empirical example using a real-life dataset from the Nursing Home Compare, a national survey conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The empirical example provided promising evidence that interval matching reduced more selection bias than did commonly used matching methods including the rival method, caliper matching. Interval matching’s approach methodologically sounds more meaningful than its competing matching methods because interval matching develop a more “scientific” criterion for matching units using confidence intervals.

          Conclusions

          Interval matching is a promisingly better alternative tool for reducing selection bias in making causal inference from observational studies, especially useful in secondary data analysis on national databases such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

            Causal effect modeling with naturalistic rather than experimental data is challenging. In observational studies participants in different treatment conditions may also differ on pretreatment characteristics that influence outcomes. Propensity score methods can theoretically eliminate these confounds for all observed covariates, but accurate estimation of propensity scores is impeded by large numbers of covariates, uncertain functional forms for their associations with treatment selection, and other problems. This article demonstrates that boosting, a modern statistical technique, can overcome many of these obstacles. The authors illustrate this approach with a study of adolescent probationers in substance abuse treatment programs. Propensity score weights estimated using boosting eliminate most pretreatment group differences and substantially alter the apparent relative effects of adolescent substance abuse treatment. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              An introduction to the bootstrap

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wei.pan@duke.edu
                haiyan.bai@ucf.edu
                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2288
                28 July 2015
                28 July 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 53
                Affiliations
                [ ]School of Nursing, Duke University, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710 USA
                [ ]Department of Educational and Human Sciences, University of Central Florida, PO Box 161250, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
                Article
                49
                10.1186/s12874-015-0049-3
                4517543
                26215035
                c3bdc9c3-a684-4443-b3ad-ffbef0e163ac
                © Pan and Bai. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 8 November 2014
                : 13 July 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                observational studies,propensity score methods,propensity score matching,nearest neighbour matching,caliper matching,the bootstrap,confidence intervals,causal inference

                Comments

                Comment on this article