13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A safety culture assessment by mixed methods at a public maternity and infant hospital in China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess safety culture at a public maternity hospital in Shanghai, China, using a sequential mixed methods approach. The study was part of a bigger study looking at the application of the mixed methods approach to assess safety culture in health care in different organizations and countries.

          Methodology

          A mixed methods approach was utilized by first distributing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire measuring six safety culture dimensions and five independent items to all hospital staff (n=1482) working in 18 departments at a single hospital. Afterward, semistructured interviews were conducted using convenience sampling, where 48 hospital staff from nine departments at the same hospital were individually interviewed.

          Results

          The survey received a response rate of 96%. The survey findings show significant differences between the hospital departments in almost all safety culture dimensions and independent items. Similarly, the interview findings revealed that there were different, competing priorities between departments perceived to result in a reduced quality of collaboration and bottlenecks in care delivery. Another major finding was that staff who worked more hours per week would perceive working conditions significantly more negatively. Issues related to working conditions were also the most common concerns discussed in the interviews, especially the issue on high workload. High workload was also reflected in the fact that 91.45% of survey respondents reported that they worked 40 hours or longer per week. Finally, interview findings complemented survey findings, thus providing a more complete and accurate picture of safety culture.

          Conclusion

          Hospital leaders need to prioritize interventions focused on improving the quality of cross-department collaboration and reducing workload. A mixed methods assessment of safety culture provides more meaningful, targeted results, enabling leaders to prioritize and tailor improvement efforts to increase the impact of an intervention.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations.

              Increasingly, healthcare organizations are becoming aware of the importance of transforming organizational culture in order to improve patient safety. Growing interest in safety culture has been accompanied by the need for assessment tools focused on the cultural aspects of patient safety improvement efforts. This paper discusses the use of safety culture assessment as a tool for improving patient safety. It describes the characteristics of culture assessment tools presently available and discusses their current and potential uses, including brief examples from healthcare organizations that have undertaken such assessments. The paper also highlights critical processes that healthcare organizations need to consider when deciding to use these tools.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
                Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
                Dove Medical Press
                1178-2390
                2017
                03 July 2017
                : 10
                : 253-262
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Life Sciences Program, Group Technology and Research, DNV GL, Hovik, Norway
                [2 ]Quality and Safety Department, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
                [3 ]Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai
                [4 ]Healthcare Department, Business Assurance, DNV GL, Beijing, China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Tita Alissa Listyowardojo, Life Sciences Program, Group Technology and Research, Veritasveien 1, 1363 Hovik, Norway, Tel +47 9112 4056, Email tita.alissa.listyowardojo@ 123456dnvgl.com
                Article
                jmdh-10-253
                10.2147/JMDH.S136943
                5503665
                c4fc7802-f554-48dc-9220-10905f569a33
                © 2017 Listyowardojo et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                semi-structured interview,survey,one child policy,the safety attitudes questionnaire,safety climate

                Comments

                Comment on this article