4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic review of clinical guidelines for lipid lowering in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 ,
      Open Heart
      BMJ Publishing Group
      lipid lowering, general practice, lipids, statins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The WHO recommends that those with established cardiovascular disease should be treated with lipid-lowering therapy, but there is no specific guidance regarding lipid monitoring. Unnecessary general practitioner visits may be a burden for patients and increase healthcare costs. A systematic review of the current guidelines was performed to reveal gaps in the evidence base for optimal lipid monitoring approaches.

          Methods

          For this systematic review, a search of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Turning Research Into Practice databases was conducted for relevant guidelines published in the 10 years prior to 31 December 2019. Recommendations surrounding the frequency of testing, lipid-lowering therapies and target cholesterol values were compared qualitatively. Each guideline was assessed using the 2009 Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool.

          Results

          Twenty-two guidelines were included. All recommended statins as the primary lipid-lowering therapy, with a high level of supporting evidence. Considerable variation was found in the recommendations for cholesterol targets. Seventeen guidelines provided at least one cholesterol target, which for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ranged between 1.0 and 2.6 mmol/L, although the most frequently recommended was <1.8 mmol/L (n=12). For long-term follow-up, many recommended reviewing patients annually (n=9), although there was some variation in recommendations for the interval of between 3 and 12 months. Supporting evidence for any approach was limited, often being derived from clinical opinion.

          Conclusions

          Further research is required to provide an evidence base for optimal lipid monitoring of the on-statin secondary prevention population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

          Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by approximately 60%. Whether it prevents cardiovascular events is uncertain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015

              Background The burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remains unclear in many regions of the world. Objectives The GBD (Global Burden of Disease) 2015 study integrated data on disease incidence, prevalence, and mortality to produce consistent, up-to-date estimates for cardiovascular burden. Methods CVD mortality was estimated from vital registration and verbal autopsy data. CVD prevalence was estimated using modeling software and data from health surveys, prospective cohorts, health system administrative data, and registries. Years lived with disability (YLD) were estimated by multiplying prevalence by disability weights. Years of life lost (YLL) were estimated by multiplying age-specific CVD deaths by a reference life expectancy. A sociodemographic index (SDI) was created for each location based on income per capita, educational attainment, and fertility. Results In 2015, there were an estimated 422.7 million cases of CVD (95% uncertainty interval: 415.53 to 427.87 million cases) and 17.92 million CVD deaths (95% uncertainty interval: 17.59 to 18.28 million CVD deaths). Declines in the age-standardized CVD death rate occurred between 1990 and 2015 in all high-income and some middle-income countries. Ischemic heart disease was the leading cause of CVD health lost globally, as well as in each world region, followed by stroke. As SDI increased beyond 0.25, the highest CVD mortality shifted from women to men. CVD mortality decreased sharply for both sexes in countries with an SDI >0.75. Conclusions CVDs remain a major cause of health loss for all regions of the world. Sociodemographic change over the past 25 years has been associated with dramatic declines in CVD in regions with very high SDI, but only a gradual decrease or no change in most regions. Future updates of the GBD study can be used to guide policymakers who are focused on reducing the overall burden of noncommunicable disease and achieving specific global health targets for CVD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Open Heart
                Open Heart
                openhrt
                openheart
                Open Heart
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2053-3624
                2020
                18 December 2020
                : 7
                : 2
                : e001396
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK
                [2 ]departmentLancaster Medical School , Lancaster University , Lancaster, Lancashire, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Jennifer Logue; j.logue1@ 123456lancaster.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7970-3643
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-2738
                Article
                openhrt-2020-001396
                10.1136/openhrt-2020-001396
                7751215
                c568ed8f-f59a-4bc5-9519-2c4feb3839e5
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 July 2020
                : 09 October 2020
                : 27 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: MR/N013166/1
                Categories
                Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention
                1506
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                lipid lowering,general practice,lipids,statins
                lipid lowering, general practice, lipids, statins

                Comments

                Comment on this article