Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative diagnostic efficacy of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in hepatocellular carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common liver malignancy in Nigeria. Hepatitis B and C viruses, alcohol and Aflatoxin B are among the various aetiologies. More work needs to be done in the search for markers that will aid early detection of this condition as it is uniformly fatal once advanced. Alphafetoprotein (AFP) remains the most widely used tumour marker of HCC detection in spite of its known shortcomings. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) , in comparison to alphafetoprotein in the detection of HCC.

          Method

          Sixty patients with HCC and thirty apparently healthy controls attending the Medical Outpatient Department(MOPD) of the University College Hospital Ibadan(UCH) Nigeria were selected for the study. Questionnaire was used to collect clinical data while AFP, SCCA levels, serum HBsAg and anti-HCV were determined using ELISA method- (Diagnostic Automation Inc. Canada). Abdominal ultrasound scan was also done.

          Result

          Thirty one (51.7%) out of 60 selected cases were positive for HBsAg while six (20%) out of 30 controls were positive for HBsAg(p = 0.004). Out of the 60 cases selected for this study, only 2 (3.3.%) cases were positive for hepatitis C virus, while only 1(3.3%) out of 30 control was positive for hepatitis C virus(p = 0.74).

          The mean AFP value for cases with HCC was 393.21 ng/ml ±386.97 compared to the control group which was 5.60 ± 13.03 ng/ml (p value 0.001). The mean SCCA level was 0.64 ± 0.56 ng/ml and 0.71 ± 0.65 ng/ml for cases and controls respectively (p = 0.631).

          Conclusion

          Alphafetoprotein remains a good tumour marker for the diagnosis of HCC. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCCA) has no discriminatory power and may not be useful as a tumour marker for Nigerians with hepatocellular carcinoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, and screening.

          In this article, the epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), risk factors for the development of HCC, and how these factors affect the decision about whether an individual should or should be entered into a screening program are considered. The factors determining the risk for HCC include age, male gender, and the nature of the underlying liver disease. In particular, cirrhosis is associated with a significant risk for HCC. However, in hepatitis B HCC also occurs in noncirrhotic liver. Decision analysis can be used to identify patients at greatest risk for HCC and who might be candidates for screening. Screening itself should be developed in a programmatic manner to ensure that appropriate target populations are identified, that appropriate screening tests are chosen, and that appropriate recall and enhanced follow-up are instituted for patients who have positive screening test results. Screening should be by ultrasonography at 4- to 12-month intervals. Patients with abnormal screening tests require additional investigation using computed tomography scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, or liver biopsy. Negative results do not exclude the possibility of cancer and further follow-up is necessary.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Overexpression of squamous cell carcinoma antigen variants in hepatocellular carcinoma

            Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most important sanitary problems over the world for its high prevalence and for its poor prognosis. More than 250 000 new cases per year are diagnosed and mean 5-year survival is lower than 5% (El-Serag and Mason, 1999). Several factors have been involved in the development of liver cancer, some of them differing in various geographic areas and explaining, at least in part, distinct geographical incidence (Bruix et al, 2001). The most powerful risk factor is the presence of liver cirrhosis. Among cirrhotic Caucasian patients, chronic viral infection by HBV and HCV are the most biologically relevant causes leading to this clinical condition (Benvegnù et al, 1994). However, pathogenetic mechanisms of neoplastic transformation are still unclear; several growth factors and tumour suppressor genes (Collier et al, 1993; Naka et al, 1998; Abou-Shady et al, 1999) have been involved but insufficient data have been generated to date. cDNA microarray analyses for gene expression profiling and potential identification of target genes for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are ongoing (Shirota et al, 2001; Takeo et al, 2001; Xu et al, 2001). Squamous cell carcinoma antigen is a serine protease inhibitor physiologically found in the spinous and granular layers of normal squamous epithelium, but typically expressed by neoplastic cells of epithelial origin (Kato, 1996). Recent studies indicate that both SCCA1 and SCCA2, the two isoforms so far identified (Schneider et al, 1995), protect neoplastic cells from apoptotic death induced by several kinds of stimuli, and in vivo experiments demonstrate that SCCA1 can promote tumour growth (Suminami et al, 2000, 2001). Little is known on the behaviour of this serpin in different clinical settings; in particular, no information is available on its expression in hepatocarcinoma. In the present study, we analysed the expression of SCCA in a large series of HCCs of different aetiology, using a novel antibody raised against SCCA variants and cellular transcripts were then characterised by direct sequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients The 65 HCC patients included in the study had a median age of 65 years (range 23–76 years), with a male/female ratio of 2:1. In total, 37 patients were anti-HCV positive, eight were HBsAg positive, six were coinfected by HBV and HCV, eight admitted alcohol abuse, while for the remaining six patients no risk factors were identified. Liver function tests and AFP were available in all cases, as required for clinical management of the patients. Liver specimens, achieved for diagnostic purposes, were obtained by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of hepatic nodules in 47 patients with cirrhosis, while in the remaining 18 patients, including 12 cases with cirrhosis and six without cirrhosis, specimens of tumour and nontumour liver samples were collected at the time of surgical resection. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were available in all cases, while part of the surgical samples was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for further analysis. Control liver biopsies were obtained from 20 patients who underwent cholecystectomy or liver biopsy for the staging of mediastinal or laterocervical Hodgkin's disease (Calabrese et al, 2000). Histological evaluation Paraffin sections were analysed for the presence of SCCA and regeneration activity by immunohistochemistry. For SCCA detection, a novel polyclonal rabbit antibody (Hepa-Ab, Xeptagen, Italy) raised against recombinant SCCA1 and affinity purified on a Sepharose-SCCA1 column was used. Epitope mapping studies with SCCA1 fragments obtained by SCCA1 enzymatic digestion or by chemical synthesis indicated that the affinity-purified polyclonal antibody recognises several epitopes located in the N-terminal, C-terminal as well as in the central portion of SCCA1, as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot. Hepa-Ab was used at a concentration of 4 μg ml−1, while anti-Ki67 (MIB-1, Immunotech, Marseille, France) monoclonal antibody was used at 1 : 50 dilution. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 30 min, after blocking endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide, heating the slides in 10 mM sodium citrate in a microwave oven and blocking nonspecific protein binding in normal goat serum. Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit or horse anti-mouse (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) was then added for 30 min. Samples were incubated with avidin–biotin–peroxidase and stained with a mixture of 3,3′-diamino-benzidine tetrahydrochloride (Dako) and hydrogen peroxide. For all experiments of immunohistochemistry, as negative control, sections were incubated with the omission of primary antibody, substituted by diluent or by the appropriate nonimmune IgG in each case. Antibody specificity was confirmed using human skin specimens for SCCA and colonic cancer specimens for Ki67, as positive controls. The percentage of stained cells in each specimen was scored on a scale of 0–3, in which 0 denoted negative staining, score 1 positivity in 1–30% of hepatocytes, score 2 positivity in 31–50% and score 3 in more than 50%. The distribution of immunoreactivity was noted and classified as diffuse, clustered or scattered. In all cases, SCCA semiquantitative immunoreactivity was independently evaluated by two pathologists, experts in the field. Intra and interobserver differences were less than 5% and discordant cases were re-evaluated simultaneously by two observers. For tumour liver specimens obtained by resection, MIB-1 immunostaining was randomly evaluated counting at least 1000 nuclei, while in liver samples obtained by needle aspiration all the cells were counted (maximum 500 cells). The percentage of positive nuclei was expressed as MIB-1 labelling index (MIB-1-LI). In all immunohistochemical analysis, necrotic areas and edges of tissue sections were not included in the counting to avoid possible immunohistochemical false positivity. Virological assessment Anti-HCV antibody positivity was determined by commercially available ELISA and confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay version 2 or 3 (Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA). HBsAg, HBeAg and the presence of serum anti-HBc, anti-HBe and anti-HBs antibodies were evaluated by ELISA using commercially available kits (Abbott Diagnostics, North Chicago, IL, USA). HCV genotype was determined by the InnoLipa test (Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium) after reverse transcription (RT)–PCR amplification. In order to detect possible occult HBV infection, aliquots of liver HBV DNA were assessed in 17 out of 18 HBsAg-negative surgical samples by nested PCR using primers derived from the core and the S regions of viral DNA (Cacciola et al, 1999). Characterisation of SCCA transcripts cDNAs of the SCCA-related variants were obtained by RT–heminested PCR starting from total RNA extracted by single-step guanidinium method (Chomczynsky and Sacchi, 1987) from surgically obtained frozen tumour and nontumour liver samples. Samples containing 1 μg RNA were treated with 1 U μl−1 of DNAse I in reaction buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 20 mM MgCl2, 500 mM HCl), followed by the addition of 25 mM EDTA at 65°C for 10 min to block the reaction. To generate cDNAs of SCCA variants, RT and amplification were carried out using primers located in conserved regions of SCCA1 and SCCA2. Briefly, RT was carried out using 2 pmol of the antisense primer at position 1416–1386 of SCCA sequence (Suminami et al, 1991) and 1 μl of reverse transcriptase (Superscript II, GIBCO BRL). For the first step of cDNA amplification, 5 U ml−1 of Taq polymerase (Experteam, Italy) and the following primers were used: sense (CAT GAA TTC ACT CAG TGA AGC CAA C), antisense (GCA ATC AGT TTA CCA GAA CAT CTG CAG). After 40 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min, heminested PCR was carried out for additional 40 cycles in the same conditions using the sense primer described above and the antisense primer (GAC TGA ATT CAA ATC CAC TGA TGC). Actin mRNA was used as control of extracted RNA and RT–PCR was assessed using the following primers: sense (GTG GGG CGC CCC AGG CAC CA), antisense (CTC CTT AAT GTC ACG CAC GAT TTC). cDNA amplification was carried out for 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min. Samples positive for the expected 945 bp band obtained with the SCCA-derived primers were directly sequenced in both strands using an ABI PRISM BigDay terminator ready reaction kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Perkin Elmer Cetus, Emeryville, CA, USA). Electrophoresis of the sequencing products was performed by an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer (Perkin Elmer Cetus) according to the manufacturer. Statistical analysis The Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA median test, Spearman rank correlation, χ 2 and Fisher exact test were used for the analysis of the results. RESULTS Immunohistochemistry Squamous cell carcinoma antigen was detected by immunohistochemistry in 55 out of 65 (85%) tumour specimens (18 out of 18 surgical specimens and 37 out of 47 fine-needle liver biopsies), but in none of the 20 surgically obtained normal human livers (Figure 1 Figure 1 Negative liver staining for SCCA variants by immunohistochemistry in normal human liver (staging liver biopsy from a patient with mediastinal Hodgkin's disease). Original magnification: × 20. ). In the majority of the cases, the positive signal was clearly detectable with score 1 in 15% of the cases, score 2 in 29% and score 3 in the remaining 56% of the patients. The same extent of immunoreactivity was observed in liver tumours expressing SCCA1, SCCA2 or SCCA-PD variants as detected by direct sequencing (see below). In all cases, the serpin was detected in the cell cytoplasm, with a prevalent diffuse pattern. In poorly differentiated tumours, a typical clustered, coarse pattern was observed (Figure 2 Figure 2 Immunohistochemistry for SCCA variants (score 3) in poorly differentiated HCC (giant cell form): most of the tumour cells show typical clustered, coarse, brown granules. Original magnification: × 572. ). No correlation with the diameter, histotype or grading of the tumour was observed. When surgical liver specimens were considered, patients with cirrhosis showed a higher score, compared to cases without cirrhosis (mean score±s.d.: 3±0.7 vs 2±0.4, P<0.05). To correlate the presence of SCCA with liver regeneration activity, consecutive slices of each tumour were stained with the Ki-67 equivalent, MIB-1 antibody, which identifies cycling cells in formalin-fixed tissue samples (Cattoretti et al, 1992). Patients with SCCA score ⩽1 showed values of MIB-1-LI significantly lower than those obtained in patients with serpin score ⩾2 (mean+s.d.: 2%±2.4 ([range 0.1−6.3%)] vs 7.5%±10.3 ([range 0.2−48%)], P<0.05), as shown in Figure 3 Figure 3 Proliferative activity expressed as MIB-1-labelling Index in HCCs with different SCCA scores. Results are expressed as percent mean+s.e. * P<0.05 vs score ⩽1 group, Student's paired t-test. . Squamous cell carcinoma antigen transcripts analysis Squamous cell carcinoma antigen mRNAs were detectable by heminested PCR in 14 out of 18 tumour samples, generating a single band at the expected size of 945 bp. None of the corresponding nontumour liver tissues showed detectable levels of the serpin in the same experimental conditions (Figure 4A Figure 4 (A) Example of PCR amplification of SCCA cDNA by heminested PCR in tumour and nontumour liver tissue, surgically obtained from the same patient. Parallel amplification of β actin cDNA is used as control of cellular mRNA. PC=positive control; NC=negative control. (B) Sequence alignment of SCCA amino-acid sequences obtained from direct sequencing of cDNA of 14 HCCs. The sequence at the top is SCCA1 and the sequence at the bottom is SCCA2 (Suminami et al, 1991). Amino-acid changes differing from SCCA1 reference sequence are reported. Cases 2, 5, 6, 7, 14 show the G351 → A mutation (SCCA-PD). ). The sensitivity of this molecular approach was lower than that of immunohistochemistry for SCCA, where all tumour samples were positive for the serpin. The nucleotide sequence alignment of the cDNA obtained by direct sequencing from the 14 tumours showed that the major SCCA sequence had complete homology with SCCA1 in six cases and with SCCA2 in three cases. In five additional cases, a novel variant, presenting a G351 to A mutation, in the reactive centre loop of the protein, was identified (Figure 4B) and termed SCCA-PD (GenBank accession number: AY190327). Correlation with clinical and virological parameters The immunoreactivity for SCCA variants in liver tumours did not show any relation with clinical and biochemical parameters, including age, sex, transaminase or AFP levels. Aetiology of HCC did not correlate with serpin expression, the mean±s.d. score being 2.1±1.1 in HCV-infected patients, 2.1±1.7 in HBsAg-positive patients, 2.2±0.4 in patients with HBV and HCV coinfection, 2.1±1.6 in patients with alcohol abuse and 2.0±0.5 in cases without overt risk factors. Occult positivity for HBV was detected in five out of 17 surgical samples obtained from HBsAg-negative patients, independently of anti-HBc or anti-HBs positivity. In HCV-positive patients, no correlation with the infecting genotype was observed. DISCUSSION In view of its prevalence and poor prognosis, HCC is a main concern. This is the first report of an high expression of SCCA in human liver cancer, detected in all surgical tumours and in 79% of the samples obtained by fine-needle aspiration, confirming a lower sensitivity of the single fine-needle procedure (Borzio et al, 1994). The majority of HCCs displayed the serpin at cytoplasmic level, while its reactivity was not detectable in normal human livers. The presence and extent of immunoreactivity, as detected using a novel anti-SCCA antibody, was not correlated with aetiologic risk factors, suggesting that overexpression of this protein is involved in pathologic stages, beyond promotion of cell transformation. The role of serpins in neoplastic cells has been focused in several studies and recent reports indicate that SCCA expression makes cancer cells resistant to several killing mechanisms by inhibition of apoptosis, involving caspase-3 activity and/or upstream proteases (Suminami et al, 2000). So far, two isoforms of SCCA (SCCA1 and SCCA2) deriving from two highly homologous tandemly arrayed genes and their promoter regions have been identified on chromosome 18q21.3 (Schneider et al, 1995; Sakaguchi et al, 1999; Hamada et al, 2001). In this study, direct sequencing was used to characterise the expression of the major species of SCCA variants in individual tumours and a new variant has been identified in about one third of the cases, which is 99% identical to SCCA1, but presents a G351 to A mutation in the reactive centre of the protein. Since the mechanism of protease inhibition by serpins involves a profound change in conformation, initiated by interaction of the protease with the reactive centre of the serpin (Huntington et al, 2000), the specific amino-acid change detected in the reactive centre of SCCA-PD might confer a different biological behaviour to the serpin and enzymatic activity of this new variant is currently under investigation. Mutations affecting this region may indeed result in inhibition of different classes of proteinases, as shown for SCCA1 and SCCA2 (Kato, 1996) or in a loss or change of function, as described in several human diseases affecting different members of the ovalbumin family of serpins, including emphysema and cirrhosis, haemorragic diseases, thrombosis and familial angioedema (Carrell and Lomas, 2002). The SCCA-PD variant was detected in one third of the cases and the limited number of patients did not allow any correlation with clinical or morphological parameters. Further studies are required to assess whether tumour behaviour and clinical outcome of patients with HCC are influenced by the extent and/or type of SCCA expression in individual tumours.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: influence of ethnic status.

              The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) seems to be rising in the United States (US), and considerable variability in the incidence and etiology of HCC has been noted among different racial and ethnic groups in this country. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of racial and ethnic status in the viral etiology of HCC in the US. Retrospective surveys were conducted at liver transplantation centers in the US. Respondents were asked to review the charts of all patients with HCC seen at their institution for the 2-yr period between July, 1997, and June, 1999, and provide information about the racial and ethnic distribution of cases and their serological status with regard to hepatitis B and C markers. Complete information was available on 691 patients who formed the basis of this study, comprising 59% whites, 14% blacks, 16% Asians, and 11% other racial groups. Of the patients, 107 patients (15.4%) were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 322 had antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) (46.5%), 33 (4.7%) had both HBsAg and anti-HCV), and 229 (33.1%) had neither marker present. Clear differences were seen among racial groups. Anti-HCV positivity was the most frequent risk factor in both blacks and whites, whereas HBsAg positivity was the most frequent etiological factor in Asians with HCC. HCV infection seems to be the major risk factor for HCC in the US, particularly among individuals of white and black ethnicity, whereas hepatitis B remains the main risk factor among patients of Asian ethnicity. These preliminary findings indicate the need for a more detailed study of ethnic variability in the pathogenesis of HCC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Research Notes
                BioMed Central
                1756-0500
                2012
                3 August 2012
                : 5
                : 403
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
                [2 ]Liver and Gastrointestinal unit, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
                [3 ]Liver and Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
                [4 ]Liver and Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
                [5 ]Department of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
                Article
                1756-0500-5-403
                10.1186/1756-0500-5-403
                3502119
                22856336
                c57d3960-515d-4bcf-b14a-d8226333251b
                Copyright ©2012 Soyemi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 March 2012
                : 26 July 2012
                Categories
                Research Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article