23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Placebo Effect: Dissolving the Expectancy Versus Conditioning Debate.

      ,
      Psychological Bulletin
      American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The authors review the literature on the 2 main models of the placebo effect: expectancy theory and classical conditioning. A path is suggested to dissolving the theoretical impasse that has long plagued this issue. The key is to make a clear distinction between 2 questions: What factors shape placebo effects? and What learning mediates the placebo effect? The reviewed literature suggests that classical conditioning procedures are one shaping factor but that verbal information can also shape placebo effects. The literature also suggests that conditioning procedures and other sources of information sometimes shape conscious expectancies and that these expectancies mediate some placebo effects; however, in other cases conditioning procedures appear to shape placebo effects that are not mediated by conscious cognition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the generality of the laws of learning.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychological Bulletin
                Psychological Bulletin
                American Psychological Association (APA)
                1939-1455
                0033-2909
                2004
                2004
                : 130
                : 2
                : 324-340
                Article
                10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.324
                14979775
                c6904b14-8746-415a-8df9-f52679ad09cf
                © 2004
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article