335
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Classification of relapse pattern in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Relapse of clubfoot deformity following correction by Ponseti technique is not uncommon. The relapsed feet progress from flexible to rigid if left untreated and can become as severe as the initial deformity. No definitive classification exists to assess a relapsed clubfoot. Some authors have used the Pirani score to rate the relapse while others have used descriptive terms. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relapse pattern in clubfeet that have undergone treatment with the Ponseti method and propose a simple classification for relapsed clubfeet.

          Materials and Methods:

          Ninety-one children (164 feet) with idiopathic clubfeet who underwent treatment with Ponseti technique presented with relapse of the deformity. There were 68 boys and 23 girls. Mean age at presentation for casting was 10.71 days (range 7-22 days). Seventy three children (146 feet, 80%) had bilateral involvement and 18 (20%) had unilateral clubfeet. The mean Pirani Score was 5.6 and 5.5 in bilateral and unilateral groups respectively. Percutaneous heel cord tenotomy was done in 65 children (130 feet, 89%) in the bilateral group and in 12 children (66%) with unilateral clubfoot.

          Results:

          Five relapse patterns were identified at a mean followup of 4.5 years (range 3-5 years) which forms the basis of this study. These relapse patterns were classified as: Grade IA: decrease in ankle dorsiflexion from15 degrees to neutral, Grade IB: dynamic forefoot adduction or supination, Grade IIA – rigid equinus, Grade IIB – rigid adduction of forefoot/midfoot complex and Grade III: combination of two or more deformities: Fixed equinus, varus and forefoot adduction.

          In the bilateral group, 21 children (38 feet, 28%) had Grade IA relapse. Twenty four children (46 feet, 34%) had dynamic intoeing (Grade IB) on walking. Thirteen children (22 feet, 16%) had true ankle equinus of varying degress (Grade IIA); eight children (13 feet, 9.7%) had fixed adduction deformity of the forefoot (Grade IIB) and seven children (14 feet, 10.7%) had two or more fixed deformities. In the unilateral group seven cases (38%) had reduced dorsiflexion (Grade IA), six (33%) had dynamic adduction (Grade IB), two (11%) had fixed equinus and adduction respectively (Grade IIA and IIB) and one (5%) child had fixed equinus and adduction deformity (Grade III). The relapses were treated by full time splint application, re-casting, tibialis anterior transfer, posterior release, corrective lateral closing wedge osteotomy and a comprehensive subtalar release. Splint compliance was compromised in both groups.

          Conclusion:

          Relapse pattern in clubfeet can be broadly classified into three distinct subsets. Early identification of relapses and early intervention will prevent major soft tissue surgery. A universal language of relapse pattern will allow comparison of results of intervention.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of congenital club foot.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

            The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Ponseti method in reducing extensive corrective surgery rates for congenital idiopathic clubfoot. Consecutive case series were conducted from January 1991 through December 2001. A total of 157 patients (256 clubfeet) were evaluated. All patients were treated by serial manipulation and casting as described by Ponseti. Main outcome measures included initial correction of the deformity, extensive corrective surgery rate, and relapses. Clubfoot correction was obtained in all but 3 patients (98%). Ninety percent of patients required
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification of clubfoot.

              Clubfeet must be classified according to severity to obtain reference points, assess the efficacy of orthopaedic treatment, and analyze the operative results objectively. A scale of 0-20 was established on the basis of four essential parameters: equinus in the sagittal plane, varus deviation in the frontal plane and derotation around the talus of the calcaneo-forefoot (CFF) block and adduction of forefoot on hindfoot in the horizontal plane. Four grades of clubfeet can be individualized: (a) Benign feet so-called "soft-soft feet," grade I, similar to postural feet, with a score of 5 to 1 (these mild feet must be excluded from any statistics as they tend to increase good results); (b) moderate feet, so-called "soft > stiff feet," grade II (reducible but partly resistant, with a score of 5-10); (c) severe feet, so-called "stiff > soft feet," grade III (resistant but partly reducible, with a score of 10-15); and (d) very severe, pseudoarthrogryposic feet, so-called "stiff-stiff feet," grade IV (score of 15-20 points). To avoid risks of errors, our method is based on a very complete checklist and on diagrams. Our training material inculdes an audiovisual package.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Orthop
                Indian J Orthop
                IJOrtho
                Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0019-5413
                1998-3727
                Jul-Aug 2013
                : 47
                : 4
                : 370-376
                Affiliations
                [1]Children Orthopaedic Clinic, Apt 003/18, MHADA Complex, Off Link Road, Nr Maheshwari Bhavan, Oshiwara, Andheri West, Mumbai, India
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedics, R N Cooper Hospital, Vile Parle, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Atul Bhaskar, Children Orthopaedic Clinic, Apt 003/18, MHADA Complex, Off Link Road, Nr Maheshwari Bhavan, Oshiwara, Andheri West, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: arb_25@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                IJOrtho-47-370
                10.4103/0019-5413.114921
                3745691
                23960281
                ca28c455-e381-40d0-81b3-8d344354440a
                Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Orthopedics
                classification,clubfoot,ponseti technique,relapse
                Orthopedics
                classification, clubfoot, ponseti technique, relapse

                Comments

                Comment on this article