191
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance.

      1 , , , ,
      Child development
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article develops and tests a reformation of Baumrind's typology of authoritarian, permissive, and authoritative parenting styles in the context of adolescent school performance. Using a large and diverse sample of San Francisco Bay Area high school students (N = 7,836), we found that both authoritarian and permissive parenting styles were negatively associated with grades, and authoritative parenting was positively associated with grades. Parenting styles generally showed the expected relation to grades across gender, age, parental education, ethnic, and family structure categories. Authoritarian parenting tended to have a stronger association with grades than did the other 2 parenting styles, except among Hispanic males. The full typology best predicted grades among white students. Pure authoritative families (high on authoritative but not high on the other 2 indices) had the highest mean grades, while inconsistent families that combine authoritarian parenting with other parenting styles had the lowest grades.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Child Dev
          Child development
          Wiley
          0009-3920
          0009-3920
          Oct 1987
          : 58
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Stanford Center for the Study of Youth Development, Stanford University, CA 94305.
          Article
          10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01455.x
          3665643
          ca55b7b5-2f9b-40fd-86d9-cee90f7a23d9
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article