53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gender disparities appear to be decreasing in academia according to a number of metrics, such as grant funding, hiring, acceptance at scholarly journals, and productivity, and it might be tempting to think that gender inequity will soon be a problem of the past. However, a large-scale analysis based on over eight million papers across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities reveals a number of understated and persistent ways in which gender inequities remain. For instance, even where raw publication counts seem to be equal between genders, close inspection reveals that, in certain fields, men predominate in the prestigious first and last author positions. Moreover, women are significantly underrepresented as authors of single-authored papers. Academics should be aware of the subtle ways that gender disparities can occur in scholarly authorship.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.

            D. Price (1965)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.

              Three experiments tested and extended recent theory regarding motivational influences on impression formation (S. T. Fiske & S. L. Neuberg, 1990; J. L. Hilton & J. M. Darley, 1991) in the context of an impression management dilemma that women face: Self-promotion may be instrumental for managing a competent impression, yet women who self-promote may suffer social reprisals for violating gender prescriptions to be modest. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of perceivers' goals on processes that inhibit stereotypical thinking, and reactions to counterstereotypical behavior. Experiments 2-3 extended these findings by including male targets. For female targets, self-promotion led to higher competence ratings but incurred social attraction and hireability costs unless perceivers were outcome-dependent males. For male targets, self-effacement decreased competence and hireability ratings, though its effects on social attraction were inconsistent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                22 July 2013
                : 8
                : 7
                : e66212
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [2 ]Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
                [4 ]Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America
                Tel Aviv University, Israel
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JDW JJ MK SJC CTB. Analyzed the data: JW CTB. Wrote the paper: JDW JJ MK SJC CTB.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-04003
                10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
                3718784
                23894278
                cc018763-764d-49ac-aa22-dd36bfd2e68b
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 January 2013
                : 7 May 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                This work was supported in part by NSF grant SBE-0915005 to CTB, NSF Graduate Research Fellowship grant DGE-1147470 to MMK, and a generous gift from JSTOR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Non-Clinical Medicine
                Health Care Policy
                Sexual and Gender Issues
                Science Policy
                Research Assessment
                Publication Practices
                Research Integrity
                Publication Ethics
                Science and Technology Workforce
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Sociology
                Social Discrimination
                Gender Discrimination
                Sexual and Gender Issues

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article