10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anti-IL-6 Therapies for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that causes recurrent attacks of optic neuritis, myelitis, and brainstem symptoms, resulting in severe neurological disability. Preventive treatment with immunosuppressive agents reduces relapse rate and improves long-term prognosis. In recent years, the potential therapeutical effect of new agents has been investigated. Two of these, the anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) agents tocilizumab and satralizumab, have been studied in active NMOSD.

          Objective

          To systematically review the current data regarding the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-6 agents in NMOSD.

          Results

          Fourteen case reports and 5 case series of intravenous tocilizumab have shown beneficial clinical and paraclinical effects compared to commonly used therapies, and another case series of subcutaneous tocilizumab has shown it is as effective as the IV formulation. A phase 2 comparative trial has shown tocilizumab IV to be more effective than azathioprine for relapse prevention. A phase 3 trial of subcutaneous satralizumab versus placebo, has shown a lower risk of relapse in the sartralizumab-treated group, both as add-on therapy to stable immunosuppressant and as monotherapy. Tocilizumab also reduced pain severity in two trials and fatigue scores in one trial, but satralizumab did not significantly improve pain and fatigue. Adverse events with both agents were relatively mild and comparable to placebo and azathioprine.

          Conclusion

          The anti-Il-6 agents tocilizumab and satralizumab show promising results in active NMOSD.

          Further randomized, larger-scale trials are needed to better define the role of these agents in the growing arsenal of NMOSD treatments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

          Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS) that is associated with serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG). Prior NMO diagnostic criteria required optic nerve and spinal cord involvement but more restricted or more extensive CNS involvement may occur. The International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) was convened to develop revised diagnostic criteria using systematic literature reviews and electronic surveys to facilitate consensus. The new nomenclature defines the unifying term NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD), which is stratified further by serologic testing (NMOSD with or without AQP4-IgG). The core clinical characteristics required for patients with NMOSD with AQP4-IgG include clinical syndromes or MRI findings related to optic nerve, spinal cord, area postrema, other brainstem, diencephalic, or cerebral presentations. More stringent clinical criteria, with additional neuroimaging findings, are required for diagnosis of NMOSD without AQP4-IgG or when serologic testing is unavailable. The IPND also proposed validation strategies and achieved consensus on pediatric NMOSD diagnosis and the concepts of monophasic NMOSD and opticospinal MS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis.

            Neuromyelitis optica is an inflammatory demyelinating disease with generally poor prognosis that selectively targets optic nerves and spinal cord. It is commonly misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis. Neither disease has a distinguishing biomarker, but optimum treatments differ. The relation of neuromyelitis optica to optic-spinal multiple sclerosis in Asia is uncertain. We assessed the capacity of a putative marker for neuromyelitis optica (NMO-IgG) to distinguish neuromyelitis optica and related disorders from multiple sclerosis. Indirect immunofluorescence with a composite substrate of mouse tissues identified a distinctive NMO-IgG staining pattern, which we characterised further by dual immunostaining. We tested masked serum samples from 102 North American patients with neuromyelitis optica or with syndromes that suggest high risk of the disorder, and 12 Japanese patients with optic-spinal multiple sclerosis. Control patients had multiple sclerosis, other myelopathies, optic neuropathies, and miscellaneous disorders. We also established clinical diagnoses for 14 patients incidentally shown to have NMO-IgG among 85000 tested for suspected paraneoplastic autoimmunity. NMO-IgG outlines CNS microvessels, pia, subpia, and Virchow-Robin space. It partly colocalises with laminin. Sensitivity and specificity were 73% (95% CI 60-86) and 91% (79-100) for neuromyelitis optica and 58% (30-86) and 100% (66-100) for optic-spinal multiple sclerosis. NMO-IgG was detected in half of patients with high-risk syndromes. Of 14 seropositive cases identified incidentally, 12 had neuromyelitis optica or a high-risk syndrome for the disease. NMO-IgG is a specific marker autoantibody of neuromyelitis optica and binds at or near the blood-brain barrier. It distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Asian optic-spinal multiple sclerosis seems to be the same as neuromyelitis optica.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS).

              Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is the most commonly used experimental model for the human inflammatory demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis (MS). EAE is a complex condition in which the interaction between a variety of immunopathological and neuropathological mechanisms leads to an approximation of the key pathological features of MS: inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss and gliosis. The counter-regulatory mechanisms of resolution of inflammation and remyelination also occur in EAE, which, therefore can also serve as a model for these processes. Moreover, EAE is often used as a model of cell-mediated organ-specific autoimmune conditions in general. EAE has a complex neuropharmacology, and many of the drugs that are in current or imminent use in MS have been developed, tested or validated on the basis of EAE studies. There is great heterogeneity in the susceptibility to the induction, the method of induction and the response to various immunological or neuropharmacological interventions, many of which are reviewed here. This makes EAE a very versatile system to use in translational neuro- and immunopharmacology, but the model needs to be tailored to the scientific question being asked. While creating difficulties and underscoring the inherent weaknesses of this model of MS in straightforward translation from EAE to the human disease, this variability also creates an opportunity to explore multiple facets of the immune and neural mechanisms of immune-mediated neuroinflammation and demyelination as well as intrinsic protective mechanisms. This allows the eventual development and preclinical testing of a wide range of potential therapeutic interventions. © 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Neuropharmacol
                Curr Neuropharmacol
                CN
                Current Neuropharmacology
                Bentham Science Publishers
                1570-159X
                1875-6190
                February 2021
                February 2021
                : 19
                : 2
                : 220-232
                Affiliations
                NYU Langone Health, Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center , New York, , USA; NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, , USA; Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Disease, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, , USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroimmunology Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv, , Israel
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to this author at the NYU Langone Health, Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, New York, USA; E-mail: itay.lotan@ 123456nyulangone.org
                Article
                CN-19-220
                10.2174/1570159X18666200429010825
                8033980
                32348222
                d083e82b-1a85-4c01-927c-64b611152513
                © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers

                This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 March 2020
                : 13 April 2020
                : 24 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                nmosd, ,mog-antibody disease,,treatment,,efficacy,,safety, ,interleukin-6,,anti-il-6 receptor,tocilizumab,,satralizumab

                Comments

                Comment on this article