14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative proteomic profiling of the serum differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Finland ranks sixth among the countries having highest incidence rate of pancreatic cancer with mortality roughly equaling incidence. The average age of diagnosis for pancreatic cancer is 69 years in Nordic males, whereas the average age of diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is 40–50 years, however, many cases overlap in age. By radiology, the evaluation of a pancreatic mass, that is, the differential diagnosis between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Preoperative needle biopsies are difficult to obtain and are demanding to interpret. New blood based biomarkers are needed. The accuracy of the only established biomarker for pancreatic cancer, CA 19‐9 is rather poor in differentiating between benign and malignant mass of the pancreas. In this study, we have performed mass spectrometry analysis (High Definition MS E) of serum samples from patients with chronic pancreatitis (13) and pancreatic cancer (22). We have quantified 291 proteins and performed detailed statistical analysis such as principal component analysis, orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis and receiver operating curve analysis. The proteomic signature of chronic pancreatitis versus pancreatic cancer samples was able to separate the two groups by multiple statistical techniques. Some of the enriched pathways in the proteomic dataset were LXR/RXR activation, complement and coagulation systems and inflammatory response. We propose that multiple high‐confidence biomarker candidates in our pilot study including Inter‐alpha‐trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H2 (Area under the curve, AUC: 0.947), protein AMBP (AUC: 0.951) and prothrombin (AUC: 0.917), which should be further evaluated in larger patient series as potential new biomarkers for differential diagnosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Integrated pathway-level analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics data with IMPaLA.

            Pathway-level analysis is a powerful approach enabling interpretation of post-genomic data at a higher level than that of individual biomolecules. Yet, it is currently hard to integrate more than one type of omics data in such an approach. Here, we present a web tool 'IMPaLA' for the joint pathway analysis of transcriptomics or proteomics and metabolomics data. It performs over-representation or enrichment analysis with user-specified lists of metabolites and genes using over 3000 pre-annotated pathways from 11 databases. As a result, pathways can be identified that may be disregulated on the transcriptional level, the metabolic level or both. Evidence of pathway disregulation is combined, allowing for the identification of additional pathways with changed activity that would not be highlighted when analysis is applied to any of the functional levels alone. The tool has been implemented both as an interactive website and as a web service to allow a programming interface. The web interface of IMPaLA is available at http://impala.molgen.mpg.de. A web services programming interface is provided at http://impala.molgen.mpg.de/wsdoc. kamburov@molgen.mpg.de; r.cavill@imperial.ac.uk; h.keun@imperial.ac.uk Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The clinical utility of CA 19-9 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic updates.

              CA 19-9 and CEA are the most commonly used biomarkers for diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic cancer. Since the original compendium by Steinberg in 1990, numerous studies have reported the use of CA 19-9 and, to a lesser extent, CEA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Here we update an evaluation of the accuracy of CA 19-9 and CEA, and, unlike previous reviews, focus on discrimination between malignant and benign disease instead of normal controls. In 57 studies involving 3,285 pancreatic carcinoma cases, the combined sensitivity of CA 19-9 was 78.2% and in 37 studies involving 1,882 cases with benign pancreatic disease the specificity of CA 19-9 was 82.8%. From the combined analysis of studies reporting CEA, the sensitivity was 44.2% (1,324 cases) and the specificity was 84.8% (656 cases). These measurements more appropriately reflect the expected biomarker accuracy in the differential diagnosis of patients with periampullary diseases. We also present a summary of the use of CA 19-9 as a prognostic tool and evaluate CA 19-9 diagnostic and prognostic utility in a 10-year, single institution experience.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sarawat.mk@gmail.com
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                01 June 2017
                July 2017
                : 6
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.2017.6.issue-7 )
                : 1738-1751
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Transplantation Laboratory Haartman Institute University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                [ 2 ] HUSLAB Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
                [ 3 ] Department of Surgery University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
                [ 4 ] Translational Cancer Biology Program Research Programs Unit University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Mayank Saraswat, Transplantation laboratory, Haartmaninkatu 3, PO Box 21, FI‐00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. 14. Tel: +358‐449572310; Fax: +358‐294126700; E‐mail: sarawat.mk@ 123456gmail.com

                [†]

                Equal contribution

                [‡]

                Equal contribution

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-8150
                Article
                CAM41107
                10.1002/cam4.1107
                5504330
                28573829
                d087edf3-b2d4-414c-99c9-033521dfb2be
                © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 February 2017
                : 23 March 2017
                : 24 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 14, Words: 9285
                Funding
                Funded by: Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
                Funded by: Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
                Categories
                Original Research
                Cancer Biology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cam41107
                July 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.3 mode:remove_FC converted:11.07.2017

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                chronic pancreatitis,hdmse,opls‐da,pancreatic adenocarcinoma,pancreatic cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article