21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Carbapenems to Treat Multidrug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Carbapenems (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem) are used to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR-) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), even if the published evidence is limited, particularly when it is otherwise difficult to identify the recommended four active drugs to be included in the regimen. No systematic review to date has ever evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of carbapenems. Methods: A search of peer-reviewed, scientific evidence was carried out, aimed at evaluating the efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of carbapenem-containing regimens in individuals with pulmonary/extra-pulmonary disease which was bacteriologically confirmed as M/XDR-TB. We used PubMed to identify relevant full-text, English manuscripts up to the 20 December 2015, excluding editorials and reviews. Results: Seven out of 160 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria: two on ertapenem, one on imipenem, and four on meropenem, all published between 2005 and 2016. Of seven studies, six were retrospective, four were performed in a single center, two enrolled children, two had a control group, and six reported a proportion of XDR-TB cases higher than 20%. Treatment success was higher than 57% in five studies with culture conversion rates between 60% and 94.8%. Conclusions: The safety and tolerability is very good, with the proportion of adverse events attributable to carbapenems below 15%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          WHO guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2011 update.

          The production of guidelines for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) fits the mandate of the World Health Organization (WHO) to support countries in the reinforcement of patient care. WHO commissioned external reviews to summarise evidence on priority questions regarding case-finding, treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), monitoring the response to MDR-TB treatment, and models of care. A multidisciplinary expert panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. The recommendations support the wider use of rapid drug susceptibility testing for isoniazid and rifampicin or rifampicin alone using molecular techniques. Monitoring by sputum culture is important for early detection of failure during treatment. Regimens lasting ≥ 20 months and containing pyrazinamide, a fluoroquinolone, a second-line injectable drug, ethionamide (or prothionamide), and either cycloserine or p-aminosalicylic acid are recommended. The guidelines promote the early use of antiretroviral agents for TB patients with HIV on second-line drug regimens. Systems that primarily employ ambulatory models of care are recommended over others based mainly on hospitalisation. Scientific and medical associations should promote the recommendations among practitioners and public health decision makers involved in MDR-TB care. Controlled trials are needed to improve the quality of existing evidence, particularly on the optimal composition and duration of MDR-TB treatment regimens.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs: impact on multidrug-resistant TB outcomes.

            A meta-analysis for response to treatment was undertaken using individual data of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) (resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin) patients from 26 centres. The analysis assessed the impact of additional resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or second-line injectable drugs on treatment outcome. Compared with treatment failure, relapse and death, treatment success was higher in MDR-TB patients infected with strains without additional resistance (n=4763; 64%, 95% CI 57-72%) or with resistance to second-line injectable drugs only (n=1130; 56%, 95% CI 45-66%), than in those having resistance to fluoroquinolones alone (n=426; 48%, 95% CI 36-60%) or to fluoroquinolones plus second-line injectable drugs (extensively drug resistant (XDR)-TB) (n=405; 40%, 95% CI 27-53%). In XDR-TB patients, treatment success was highest if at least six drugs were used in the intensive phase (adjusted OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.4-16.6; reference fewer than three drugs) and four in the continuation phase (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4-26.3). The odds of success in XDR-TB patients was maximised when the intensive phase reached 6.6-9.0 months duration and the total duration of treatment 20.1-25.0 months. In XDR-TB patients, regimens containing more drugs than those recommended in MDR-TB but given for a similar duration were associated with the highest odds of success. All data were from observational studies and methodologies varied between centres, therefore, the bias may be substantial. Better quality evidence is needed to optimise regimens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global tuberculosis report 2012

              (2012)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                12 March 2016
                March 2016
                : 17
                : 3
                : 373
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari—Research, Medical Education and Professional Development Unit, AOU Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy; gsotgiu@ 123456uniss.it (G.S.); simonedore@ 123456hotmail.com (S.D.)
                [2 ]World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Fondazione S. Maugeri, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Sceintifico), Via Roncaccio 16, Tradate 21049, Italy; lia.dambrosio@ 123456fsm.it (L.D.A.); rosella.centis@ 123456fsm.it (R.C.)
                [3 ]Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano 6900, Switzerland
                [4 ]Division of Infection, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 2ES, UK; simon.tiberi@ 123456bartshealth.nhs.uk
                [5 ]Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Sceintifico) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy; susanna.esposito@ 123456unimi.it
                [6 ]Pneumology Unit, Fondazione Maugeri, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Sceintifico), Tradate 21049, Italy; antonio.spanevello@ 123456fsm.it
                [7 ]Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese 21100, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: giovannibattista.migliori@ 123456fsm.it ; Tel.: +39-0331-829-404
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                ijms-17-00373
                10.3390/ijms17030373
                4813232
                26985890
                d1279ba3-aec8-4e72-a839-14b554950469
                © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 01 February 2016
                : 07 March 2016
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                mdr-tb,xdr-tb,carbapenems,imipenem,meropenem,ertapenem,effectiveness,safety,tolerability
                Molecular biology
                mdr-tb, xdr-tb, carbapenems, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, effectiveness, safety, tolerability

                Comments

                Comment on this article