Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in Health Insurance Coverage Over Time by Immigration Status Among US Older Adults, 1992-2016

      research-article
      , MPP 1 , , PhD 2 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 4 , , BMedSci 5 , , MEng 6 , , PhD, MPH 3 , , PhD 5 , 7 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does health insurance coverage over time differ between recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant adults in the US?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 9691 US adults, recent immigrants were 15% less likely than nonimmigrants to have insurance coverage at baseline, but this disparity was eliminated over the 24-year follow-up period in association with large increases in public insurance.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that public insurance programs such as Medicare play a prominent role in reducing disparities in insurance coverage for recent immigrants compared with nonimmigrants.

          Abstract

          This cohort study compares longitudinal changes in insurance coverage over 24 years of follow-up between recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant adults in the US.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Disparities in health insurance coverage by immigration status are well documented; however, there are few data comparing long-term changes in insurance coverage between immigrant and nonimmigrant adults as they age into older adulthood.

          Objective

          To compare longitudinal changes in insurance coverage over 24 years of follow-up between recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant adults in the US.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This population-based cohort study used data from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. Data were collected biennially from 1992 to 2016. The population included community-dwelling US adults born between 1931 and 1941 and aged 51 to 61 years at baseline. Statistical analysis was performed from February 3, 2017, to January 10, 2020.

          Exposures

          Participants were categorized as nonimmigrants (born in the US), early immigrants (immigrated to the US before the age of 18 years), and recent immigrants (immigrated to the US from the age of 18 years onward).

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Self-reported data on public, employer, long-term care, and other private insurance were used to define any insurance coverage. Longitudinal changes in insurance coverage were examined over time by immigration status using generalized estimating equations accounting for inverse probability of attrition weights. The association between immigration status and continuous insurance coverage was also evaluated.

          Results

          A total of 9691 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [3.2] years; 5111 [52.6%] female). Nonimmigrants composed 90% (n = 8649) of the cohort; early immigrants, 2% (n = 201); and recent immigrants, 8% (n = 841). Insurance coverage increased from 68%, 83%, and 86% of recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant older adults, respectively, in 1992 to 97%, 100%, and 99% in 2016. After accounting for selective attrition, recent immigrants were 15% less likely than nonimmigrants to have any insurance at baseline (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88), driven by lower rates of private insurance. However, disparities in insurance decreased incrementally over time and were eliminated, such that insurance coverage rates were similar between groups as participants attained Medicare age eligibility. Furthermore, recent immigrants were less likely than nonimmigrants to be continuously insured (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among community-dwelling adults who were not age eligible for Medicare, recent immigrants had lower rates of health insurance, but this disparity was eliminated over the 24-year follow-up period because of uptake of public insurance among all participants. Future studies should evaluate policies and health care reforms aimed at reducing disparities among vulnerable populations such as recent immigrants who are not age eligible for Medicare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

          In ideal randomised experiments, association is causation: association measures can be interpreted as effect measures because randomisation ensures that the exposed and the unexposed are exchangeable. On the other hand, in observational studies, association is not generally causation: association measures cannot be interpreted as effect measures because the exposed and the unexposed are not generally exchangeable. However, observational research is often the only alternative for causal inference. This article reviews a condition that permits the estimation of causal effects from observational data, and two methods -- standardisation and inverse probability weighting -- to estimate population causal effects under that condition. For simplicity, the main description is restricted to dichotomous variables and assumes that no random error attributable to sampling variability exists. The appendix provides a generalisation of inverse probability weighting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms.

            Eliminating health disparities is a fundamental, though not always explicit, goal of public health research and practice. There is a burgeoning literature in this area, but a number of unresolved issues remain. These include the definition of what constitutes a disparity, the relationship of different bases of disadvantage, the ability to attribute cause from association, and the establishment of the mechanisms by which social disadvantage affects biological processes that get into the body, resulting in disease. We examine current definitions and empirical research on health disparities, particularly disparities associated with race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, and discuss data structures and analytic strategies that allow causal inference about the health impacts of these and associated factors. We show that although health is consistently worse for individuals with few resources and for blacks as compared with whites, the extent of health disparities varies by outcome, time, and geographic location within the United States. Empirical work also demonstrates the importance of a joint consideration of race/ethnicity and social class. Finally, we discuss potential pathways, including exposure to chronic stress and resulting psychosocial and physiological responses to stress, that serve as mechanisms by which social disadvantage results in health disparities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health of foreign-born people in the United States: a review.

              This paper identifies the overarching patterns of immigrant health in the US. Most studies indicate that foreign-born individuals are in better health than native-born Americans, including individuals of the same race/ethnicity. They tend to have lower mortality rates and are less likely to suffer from circulatory diseases, overweight/obesity, and some cancers. However, many foreign-born groups have higher rates of diabetes, some infections, and occupational injuries. There is heterogeneity in health among immigrants, whose health increasingly resembles that of natives with duration of US residence. Prospective studies are needed to better understand migrant health and inform interventions for migrant health maintenance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                11 March 2020
                March 2020
                11 March 2020
                : 3
                : 3
                : e200731
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC
                [2 ]Independent Researcher, Los Angeles, California
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
                [5 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
                [6 ]Inspire, Arlington, Virginia
                [7 ]Social & Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, Maryland
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: January 22, 2020.
                Published: March 11, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0731
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Cobian J et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Adan Z. Becerra, PhD, Social & Scientific Systems, 8757 Georgia Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20910 ( abecerra@ 123456s-3.com ).
                Author Contributions: Mr Mendis and Dr Becerra had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Cobian, González, Cao, Xu, Li, Becerra.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Cobian, González, Xu, Mendis, Becerra.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: All authors.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: González.
                Supervision: González, Becerra.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: The Health and Retirement Study is a longitudinal project sponsored by the National Institute on Aging through grant U01AG009740 and by the Social Security Administration.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi200049
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0731
                7066476
                32159811
                d3087f61-54d2-4ff9-b854-5e5f97683bbf
                Copyright 2020 Cobian J et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 17 October 2019
                : 22 January 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article