21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization

      research-article
      a , b , c , 1 , d , e , d , f , g , d , h , i , c , d , d , g , i , i , i , i , i , i , i , j , c , k , l , m , n , i , o , p , l , q , r , s , t , u , v , w , u , x , y , z , aa , bb , cc , dd , ee , m , ff , gg , hh , v , ii , jj , kk , ll , mm , nn , oo , pp , 1
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
      National Academy of Sciences
      cultural evolution, sociopolitical complexity, comparative history, comparative archaeology, quantitative history

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Do human societies from around the world exhibit similarities in the way that they are structured and show commonalities in the ways that they have evolved? To address these long-standing questions, we constructed a database of historical and archaeological information from 30 regions around the world over the last 10,000 years. Our analyses revealed that characteristics, such as social scale, economy, features of governance, and information systems, show strong evolutionary relationships with each other and that complexity of a society across different world regions can be meaningfully measured using a single principal component of variation. Our findings highlight the power of the sciences and humanities working together to rigorously test hypotheses about general rules that may have shaped human history.

          Abstract

          Do human societies from around the world exhibit similarities in the way that they are structured, and show commonalities in the ways that they have evolved? These are long-standing questions that have proven difficult to answer. To test between competing hypotheses, we constructed a massive repository of historical and archaeological information known as “Seshat: Global History Databank.” We systematically coded data on 414 societies from 30 regions around the world spanning the last 10,000 years. We were able to capture information on 51 variables reflecting nine characteristics of human societies, such as social scale, economy, features of governance, and information systems. Our analyses revealed that these different characteristics show strong relationships with each other and that a single principal component captures around three-quarters of the observed variation. Furthermore, we found that different characteristics of social complexity are highly predictable across different world regions. These results suggest that key aspects of social organization are functionally related and do indeed coevolve in predictable ways. Our findings highlight the power of the sciences and humanities working together to rigorously test hypotheses about general rules that may have shaped human history.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Conference Proceedings: not found

          A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection in

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Theory of the Origin of the State: Traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis.

            In summary, then, the circumscription theory in its elaborated form goes far toward accounting for the origin of the state. It explains why states arose where they did, and why they failed to arise elsewhere. It shows the state to be a predictable response to certain specific cultural, demographic, and ecological conditions. Thus, it helps to elucidate what was undoubtedly the most important single step ever taken in the political evolution of mankind.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare.

              Understanding cooperation and punishment in small-scale societies is crucial for explaining the origins of human cooperation. We studied warfare among the Turkana, a politically uncentralized, egalitarian, nomadic pastoral society in East Africa. Based on a representative sample of 88 recent raids, we show that the Turkana sustain costly cooperation in combat at a remarkably large scale, at least in part, through punishment of free-riders. Raiding parties comprised several hundred warriors and participants are not kin or day-to-day interactants. Warriors incur substantial risk of death and produce collective benefits. Cowardice and desertions occur, and are punished by community-imposed sanctions, including collective corporal punishment and fines. Furthermore, Turkana norms governing warfare benefit the ethnolinguistic group, a population of a half-million people, at the expense of smaller social groupings. These results challenge current views that punishment is unimportant in small-scale societies and that human cooperation evolved in small groups of kin and familiar individuals. Instead, these results suggest that cooperation at the larger scale of ethnolinguistic units enforced by third-party sanctions could have a deep evolutionary history in the human species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                9 January 2018
                21 December 2017
                21 December 2017
                : 115
                : 2
                : E144-E151
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut , CT 06269;
                [2] bComplexity Science Hub Vienna , 1080 Wien, Austria;
                [3] cHuman Behaviour & Cultural Evolution Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, United Kingdom;
                [4] dInstitute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdom;
                [5] eMagdalen College, Oxford OX1 4AU, United Kingdom;
                [6] fSt. Benet's Hall, Oxford OX1 3LN, United Kingdom;
                [7] gSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland;
                [8] hInstitute of English Studies, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, United Kingdom;
                [9] iSeshat: Global History Databank, Evolution Institute, San Antonio, FL 33576;
                [10] jDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1H OBW, United Kingdom;
                [11] kSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287;
                [12] lInstitute of Archaeology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland;
                [13] mDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, United Kingdom;
                [14] nDepartment of History, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
                [15] oAnthropology and Museum Studies, Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54911;
                [16] pSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501;
                [17] qDivision for Byzantine Research, Institute for Medieval Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1020 Wien, Austria;
                [18] rDepartment of Anthropology, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690001, Russia;
                [19] sLaboratory of Monitoring of Destabilization Risks, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 125267, Russia;
                [20] tInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, London WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom;
                [21] uBig History Institute, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia;
                [22] vDepartment of Religious Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866;
                [23] wEast Asian Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
                [24] xDepartment of Modern Languages & Literatures, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015;
                [25] ySchool of Historical Studies, Institute of Advanced Studies, Princeton, NJ 08540;
                [26] zDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712;
                [27] aaIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605;
                [28] bbHistory, University of Iceland, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland;
                [29] ccHistory, Reykjavik Academy, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland;
                [30] ddDepartment of Southeast Asian Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260;
                [31] eeDepartment of History, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260;
                [32] ffTrinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, United Kingdom;
                [33] ggIndependent Scholar, Toronto, ON M6P 1T6, Canada;
                [34] hhFaculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6LU, United Kingdom;
                [35] iiDepartment of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104;
                [36] jjDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2S2, Canada;
                [37] kkFaculty of Oriental Studies, Oriental Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2LE, United Kingdom;
                [38] llInstitute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208;
                [39] mmDepartment of History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;
                [40] nnDepartment of History, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570;
                [41] ooInstitute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, United Kingdom;
                [42] ppDivision of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: T.Currie@ 123456exeter.ac.uk or cspencer@ 123456amnh.org .

                Contributed by Charles Spencer, November 16, 2017 (sent for review May 26, 2017; reviewed by Simon A. Levin and Charles Stanish)

                Author contributions: P.T., T.E.C., H.W., P.F., and K.F. designed research; P.T., T.E.C., H.W., P.F., K.F., D.M., D.H., C. Collins, S.G., G.M.-G., E.T., A.D., E.C., J.R., J.L., G.J., E. Brandl, A.W., R.C., M.K., A. Ceccarelli, J.F.-R., P.P., and A.P. performed research; P.T., T.E.C., and P.S. analyzed data; D.M., D.H., C. Collins, S.G., and G.M.-G. participated in the conceptual development of data coding schemes and supervised data collection; E.T., A.D., E.C., J.R., J.L., G.J., E. Brandl, A.W., R.C., M.K., A. Ceccarelli, J.F.-R., and P.-J.T. collected the data and contributed to the development of data coding schemes; P.P., A.M., J.P.-K., N.K., A. Korotayev, A.P., D.B., J. Bidmead, P.B., D.C., C. Cook, G.F., Á.D.J., A. Kristinsson, J.M., R.M., C.P., P.R.-G., B.t.H., V.W., V.M., L.X., J. Baines, E. Bridges, J. Manning., B.L., A.B., and C.S. guided data collection, checked data for their domains of expertise, and contributed to the conceptual development of data coding schemes; and P.T., T.E.C., and C.S. wrote the paper.

                Reviewers: S.A.L., Princeton University; and C.S., University of California, Los Angeles.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-7496
                Article
                201708800
                10.1073/pnas.1708800115
                5777031
                29269395
                d4382116-1fa0-4c1f-bf7a-e0bec3bde5cb
                Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) 501100000269
                Award ID: RES-060-25-0085
                Funded by: EC | Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation) 501100007601
                Award ID: No. 694986
                Funded by: EC | Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation) 501100007601
                Award ID: No. 644055
                Funded by: John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 100000925
                Award ID: 48188
                Funded by: Tricoastal Foundation
                Award ID: -
                Categories
                PNAS Plus
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                PNAS Plus

                cultural evolution,sociopolitical complexity,comparative history,comparative archaeology,quantitative history

                Comments

                Comment on this article