2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Aspirin and Hemocompatibility Events With a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Advanced Heart Failure : The ARIES-HM3 Randomized Clinical Trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 3 , 4 , 11 , 1 , 5 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 6 , 6 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 21 , 21 , 22 , 22 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 23 , ARIES-HM3 Investigators
      JAMA
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IMPORTANCE

          Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) enhance quality and duration of life in advanced heart failure. The burden of nonsurgical bleeding events is a leading morbidity. Aspirin as an antiplatelet agent is mandated along with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with continuous-flow LVADs without conclusive evidence of efficacy and safety.

          OBJECTIVE

          To determine whether excluding aspirin as part of the antithrombotic regimen with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD is safe and decreases bleeding.

          DESIGN, SETTING, and PARTICIPANTS

          This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aspirin (100 mg/d) vs placebo with VKA therapy in patients with advanced heart failure with an LVAD was conducted across 51 centers with expertise in treating patients with advanced heart failure across 9 countries. The randomized population included 628 patients with advanced heart failure implanted with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD (314 in the placebo group and 314 in the aspirin group), of whom 296 patients in the placebo group and 293 in the aspirin group were in the primary analysis population, which informed the primary end point analysis. The study enrolled patients from July 2020 to September 2022; median follow-up was 14 months.

          Intervention

          Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive aspirin (100 mg/d) or placebo in addition to an antithrombotic regimen.

          MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

          The composite primary end point, assessed for noninferiority (−10% margin) of placebo, was survival free of a major nonsurgical (>14 days after implant) hemocompatibility-related adverse events (including stroke, pump thrombosis, major bleeding, or arterial peripheral thromboembolism) at 12 months. The principal secondary end point was nonsurgical bleeding events.

          RESULTS

          Of the 589 analyzed patients, 77% were men; one-third were Black and 61% were White. More patients were alive and free of hemocompatibility events at 12 months in the placebo group (68%) vs those taking aspirin (74%). Noninferiority of placebo was demonstrated (absolute between-group difference, 6.0% improvement in event-free survival with placebo [lower 1-sided 97.5% CI, −1.6%]; P < .001). Aspirin avoidance was associated with reduced nonsurgical bleeding events (relative risk, 0.66 [95% confidence limit, 0.51-0.85]; P = .002) with no increase in stroke or other thromboembolic events, a finding consistent among diverse subgroups of patient characteristics.

          CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

          In patients with advanced heart failure treated with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD, avoidance of aspirin as part of an antithrombotic regimen, which includes VKA, is not inferior to a regimen containing aspirin, does not increase thromboembolism risk, and is associated with a reduction in bleeding events.

          TRIAL REGISTRATION

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04069156

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of low-dose aspirin on acute inflammatory responses in humans.

          Aspirin is a unique nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; at high doses (aspirin(high), 1g), it is anti-inflammatory stemming from the inhibition of cyclooxygenase and proinflammatory signaling pathways including NF-kappaB, but is cardioprotective at lower doses (aspirin(low), 75 mg). The latter arises from the inhibition of thromboxane (Tx) B(2), a prothrombotic eicosanoid also implicated in polymorphonuclear leukocyte trafficking. As a result, aspirin(low) is widely used as a primary and secondary preventative against vascular disease. Despite this and its ability to synthesize proresolution 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) it is not known whether aspirin(low) is anti-inflammatory in humans. To address this, we generated skin blisters by topically applying cantharidin on the forearm of healthy male volunteers, causing an acute inflammatory response including dermal edema formation and leukocyte trafficking. Although not affecting blister fluid volume, aspirin(low) (75 mg, oral, once daily/10 days) reduced polymorphonuclear leukocyte and macrophage accumulation independent of NF-kappaB-regulated gene expression and inhibition of conventional prostanoids. However, aspirin(low) triggered 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) synthesis and up-regulated its receptor (FPRL1, ALX). From complimentary in vitro experiments, we propose that 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) exerts its protective effects by triggering antiadhesive NO, thereby dampening leukocyte/endothelial cell interaction and subsequent extravascular leukocyte migration. Since similar findings were obtained from murine zymosan-induced peritonitis, we suggest that aspirin(low) possesses the ability to inhibit mammalian innate immune-mediated responses. This highlights 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) as a novel anti-inflammatory working through a defined receptor and suggests that mimicking its mode of action represents a new approach to treating inflammation-driven diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial.

            The HeartWare left ventricular assist device (HVAD, HeartWare Inc, Framingham, MA) is the first implantable centrifugal continuous-flow pump approved for use as a bridge to transplantation. An infrequent but serious adverse event of LVAD support is thrombus ingestion or formation in the pump. In this study, we analyze the incidence of pump thrombus, evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various treatment strategies, and examine factors pre-disposing to the development of pump thrombus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range.

              The results of clinical trials often hinge on the quality of oral anticoagulation management, yet the quality of such management is frequently not mentioned or measured. Time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) is one measure of quality of anticoagulation dose management, but various methodologies exist for measuring TTR. This study was initiated to compare three commonly used methodologies for measuring TTR to see how they compare within the same cohort of patients. Three common methodologies of calculating time-in-therapeutic range were analyzed retrospectively in a cohort of patients over six two-month intervals. Additional analysis was performed for three and six-month intervals. The methodologies included fraction of INRs in range; cross-section of the files; and linear interpolation. Fraction of the INRs in range and cross-section of the files methodologies gave similar results, while linear interpolation yielded significantly shorter time-in-range for the two-month, three-month, and six-month intervals measured. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed. The decision of which method to use should be based on clinic size, information desired, and clinic resources for ease of applying either of the methods in clinical practice. Each of these methodologies has their limitations and the question remains as to which method best reflects the quality of anticoagulation management. Regardless of these limitations, investigators are urged to employ at least one method of measuring the quality of oral anticoagulation management so as to better assess the validity of the clinical outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                November 11 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
                [3 ]Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York
                [4 ]Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
                [5 ]University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [6 ]Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, New York, New York
                [7 ]Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [8 ]Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
                [9 ]Baptist Health Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas
                [10 ]Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
                [11 ]University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
                [12 ]Baylor University Hospital, Dallas, Texas
                [13 ]Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [14 ]Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
                [15 ]Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [16 ]University of Minnesota Medical Center Fairview Minneapolis
                [17 ]Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
                [18 ]Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City
                [19 ]National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
                [20 ]Miami Transplant Institute—Jackson Memorial, Miami, Florida
                [21 ]Abbott, Chicago, Illinois
                [22 ]The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
                [23 ]for the ARIES-HM3 Investigators
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2023.23204
                37950897
                d49e3478-dad0-44d1-88fe-2f1897eb8b94
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article