8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Generalised Epstein Semantics Characterization, Interpolation, Undefinability, and (In)Completeness

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper is a continuation of investigations concerning Epstein semantics from (Krawczyk 2022). The main tool of the present paper is the model-theoretic S-set construction introduced in (Krawczyk 2022). We use it to prove several results: 1) that each Epstein model has uncountably many equivalent Epstein models, 2) that the logic of generalised Epstein models is the S-set invariant fragment of CPL (analogon of the celebrated van Benthem characterization theorem for modal logic), 3) that several sets of Epstein models are undefinable, 4) that logics of undefinable sets of relations can be finitely axiomatised. We also use other techniques to prove: 5) that there is uncountably many extensions of the logic of generalised Epstein models and, following the well-known phenomenon of Kripke-incompleteness in modal logics, we show that 6) there is uncountably many Epstein-incomplete logics. Finally, we prove that 7) the logic of generalised Epstein models has the interpolation property.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          20 February 2024
          Article
          2402.12931
          d658d0d2-7b9c-404a-9c74-3ca52fac4741

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          03B60
          Section 6 contains axiomatisation method which has been sumbitted to the conference "1st Workshop On Relating Logic" held in Toru\'n on September 25-26 2020. The organizers did not allow me to present my results
          math.LO

          Logic & Foundation
          Logic & Foundation

          Comments

          Comment on this article