4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bioconversion of Terephthalic Acid and Ethylene Glycol Into Bacterial Cellulose by Komagataeibacter xylinus DSM 2004 and DSM 46604

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Komagataeibacter xylinus strains DSM 2004 and DSM 46604 were evaluated for their ability to grow and produce bacterial cellulose (BC) upon cultivation on terephthalic acid (TA) and ethylene glycol (EG), which are monomers of the petrochemical-derived plastic polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Both strains were able to utilize TA, EG, and their mixtures for BC synthesis, with different performances. K. xylinus DSM 2004 achieved higher BC production from TA (0.81 ± 0.01 g/L), EG (0.64 ± 0.02 g/L), and TA + EG mixtures (0.6 ± 0.1 g/L) than strain DSM 46604. The latter was unable to utilize EG as the sole carbon source and reached a BC production of 0.16 ± 0.01 g/L and 0.23 ± 0.1 g/L from TA alone or TA + EG mixtures, respectively. Further supplementing the media with glucose enhanced BC production by both strains. During cultivation on media containing TA and EG, rapid pH drop due to metabolization of EG into acidic compounds led to some precipitation of TA that was impregnated into the BC pellicles. An adaptation of the downstream procedure involving BC dissolution in NaOH was used for the recovery of pure BC. The different medium composition tested, as well as the downstream procedure, impacted the BC pellicles’ physical properties. Although no variation in terms of the chemical structure were observed, differences in crystallinity degree and microstructure of the produced BC were observed. The BC produced by K. xylinus DSM 2004 had a higher crystallinity (19–64%) than that of the strain DSM 46604 (17–53%). Moreover, the scanning electron microscopy analysis showed a higher fiber diameter for K. xylinus DSM 2004 BC (46–56 nm) than for K. xylinus DSM 46604 (37–49 nm). Dissolution of BC in NaOH did not influence the chemical structure; however, it led to BC conversion from type I to type II, as well as a decrease in crystallinity. These results demonstrate that PET monomers, TA and EG, can be upcycled into a value-added product, BC, presenting an approach that will contribute to lessening the environmental burden caused by plastic disposal in the environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance

          Although measurements of crystallinity index (CI) have a long history, it has been found that CI varies significantly depending on the choice of measurement method. In this study, four different techniques incorporating X-ray diffraction and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were compared using eight different cellulose preparations. We found that the simplest method, which is also the most widely used, and which involves measurement of just two heights in the X-ray diffractogram, produced significantly higher crystallinity values than did the other methods. Data in the literature for the cellulose preparation used (Avicel PH-101) support this observation. We believe that the alternative X-ray diffraction (XRD) and NMR methods presented here, which consider the contributions from amorphous and crystalline cellulose to the entire XRD and NMR spectra, provide a more accurate measure of the crystallinity of cellulose. Although celluloses having a high amorphous content are usually more easily digested by enzymes, it is unclear, based on studies published in the literature, whether CI actually provides a clear indication of the digestibility of a cellulose sample. Cellulose accessibility should be affected by crystallinity, but is also likely to be affected by several other parameters, such as lignin/hemicellulose contents and distribution, porosity, and particle size. Given the methodological dependency of cellulose CI values and the complex nature of cellulase interactions with amorphous and crystalline celluloses, we caution against trying to correlate relatively small changes in CI with changes in cellulose digestibility. In addition, the prediction of cellulase performance based on low levels of cellulose conversion may not include sufficient digestion of the crystalline component to be meaningful.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Plastic Degradation and Its Environmental Implications with Special Reference to Poly(ethylene terephthalate)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                05 April 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 853322
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy , School of Science and Technology , NOVA University Lisbon , Caparica, Portugal
                [2] 2 UCIBIO—Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit , Department of Chemistry , School of Science and Technology , NOVA University Lisbon , Caparica, Portugal
                [3] 3 Department of Materials Science , School of Science and Technology , NOVA University Lisbon and CEMOP/UNINOVA , Caparica, Portugal
                Author notes

                Edited by: Martin Koller, University of Graz, Austria

                Reviewed by: Carla Silva, University of Minho, Portugal

                Stanislav Obruca, Brno University of Technology, Czechia

                Marina Tišma, University of Osijek, Croatia

                *Correspondence: Filomena Freitas, a4406@ 123456fct.unl.pt

                This article was submitted to Bioprocess Engineering, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                853322
                10.3389/fbioe.2022.853322
                9036990
                35480983
                d65d0c4b-3ef3-46e0-b59b-a2d2219e0331
                Copyright © 2022 Esmail, Rebocho, Marques, Silvestre, Gonçalves, Fortunato, Torres, Reis and Freitas.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 January 2022
                : 14 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia , doi 10.13039/501100001871;
                Award ID: UIDP/04378/2020 UIDB/04378/2020 LA/P/0140/2020 LA/P/0037/2020 2021.05014.BD 2020.06470.BD
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme , doi 10.13039/100010661;
                Award ID: 870292
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 31961133016 31961133015
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Original Research

                bacterial cellulose,bioconversion,pet,terephthalic acid,ethylene glycol

                Comments

                Comment on this article