5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake in low-and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis

      research-article
      a , b , * , c , d , c , e , f
      EClinicalMedicine
      Elsevier
      Systematic review, Meta-analysis, HPV vaccine, Vaccine uptake, Low-and middle-income countries, Cervical cancer elimination, 2vHPV, bivalent HPV vaccine, 4vHPV, quadrivalent HPV vaccine, 9vHPV, 9-valent HPV vaccine, CENTRAL, cochrane central register of controlled trials, CI, confidence interval, CIN2+, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade II, EMBASE, excerpta medica dataBASE, GNI, gross national income, HPV, human papillomavirus, LMICs, Low- and middle-income countries, MSM, men having sex with men, RR, relative risk, STROBE, strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology, US, United States, WHO, World Health Organization

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The proportion of incident cases of HPV-attributable cancers is highest in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but many are yet to initiate HPV vaccination programs. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the uptake of HPV vaccination in LMICs at the beginning of the global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer and describes the gaps and challenges.

          Methods

          A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for observational studies that reported the uptake of HPV vaccination until October 2020. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model to assess the pooled estimate of HPV uptake. CRD42021218429

          Findings

          During 2008–2020, an estimated 3.3 million females received at least one dose of HPV vaccine with 61.69% of the target population vaccinated. In countries with high uptake, the pooled estimate of uptake was higher in females than males (45.48% vs 8.45%) and showed significant decline in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (89.03% vs 41.48%). In countries with low uptake, the estimate of uptake was low in both males and females (5.31% vs 2.93%) and showed increase in uptake in 2015–2020 compared to 2006–2014 (0.76% vs 5.22%). In countries with high uptake, compared to routine programs, the estimate was higher when delivered through demonstration programs (89.94% vs 59.74%).

          Interpretation

          The major concern was a significant drop in the uptake in countries that started with high uptake, challenges in the maintenance of vaccine uptake, sustainability of funding and the lack of standard monitoring and reporting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.

            In the course of performing systematic reviews on the prevalence of low back and neck pain, we required a tool to assess the risk of study bias. Our objectives were to (1) modify an existing checklist and (2) test the final tool for interrater agreement. The final tool consists of 10 items addressing four domains of bias plus a summary risk of bias assessment. Two researchers tested the interrater agreement of the tool by independently assessing 54 randomly selected studies. Interrater agreement overall and for each individual item was assessed using the proportion of agreement and Kappa statistic. Raters found the tool easy to use, and there was high interrater agreement: overall agreement was 91% and the Kappa statistic was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.76, 0.86). Agreement was almost perfect for the individual items on the tool and moderate for the summary assessment. We have addressed a research gap by modifying and testing a tool to assess risk of study bias. Further research may be useful for assessing the applicability of the tool across different conditions. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis

              Infectious pathogens are strong and modifiable causes of cancer. The aim of this study was to improve estimates of the global and regional burden of infection-attributable cancers to inform research priorities and facilitate prevention efforts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                EClinicalMedicine
                Elsevier
                2589-5370
                17 April 2021
                April 2021
                17 April 2021
                : 34
                : 100836
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Internal Medicine, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan
                [b ]Kidu Mobile Medical Unit, His Majesty's People's Project, Thimphu, Bhutan
                [c ]Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [d ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Regional Referral Hospital, Gelegphu, Bhutan
                [e ]Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
                [f ]Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Internal Medicine, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan. dorji.thinleydr@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2589-5370(21)00116-4 100836
                10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100836
                8102703
                33997733
                d8b811f2-7ec6-4728-8261-aa7e56b17517
                © 2021 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 January 2021
                : 12 March 2021
                : 24 March 2021
                Categories
                Research Paper

                systematic review,meta-analysis,hpv vaccine,vaccine uptake,low-and middle-income countries,cervical cancer elimination,2vhpv, bivalent hpv vaccine,4vhpv, quadrivalent hpv vaccine,9vhpv, 9-valent hpv vaccine,central, cochrane central register of controlled trials,ci, confidence interval,cin2+, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade ii,embase, excerpta medica database,gni, gross national income,hpv, human papillomavirus,lmics, low- and middle-income countries,msm, men having sex with men,rr, relative risk,strobe, strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology,us, united states,who, world health organization

                Comments

                Comment on this article