1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pediatric Immunization Practices in Nephrotic Syndrome: An Assessment of Provider and Parental Knowledge

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) are at high risk for vaccine-preventable infections due to the immunological effects from the disease and concurrent treatment with immunosuppressive medications. Immunizations in these patients may be deferred due to their immunosuppressive treatment which may increase the risk for vaccine-preventable infections. Immunization practices in children with NS continue to vary among pediatric nephrologists. This raises the question of whether children with NS are receiving the recommended vaccinations at appropriate times. Therefore, it is critical to understand the practices and patient education provided by physicians to patients on the topic of vaccinations.

          Methods: After informed consent, parents/guardians of 153 pediatric patients (<18 years old) diagnosed with NS from 2005 to 2018 and 50 pediatric nephrologists from 11 participating centers completed anonymous surveys to evaluate immunization practices among pediatric nephrologists, assess the vaccine education provided to families of children with NS, assess the parental knowledge of immunization recommendations, and assess predictors of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine adherence. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Immunization 2019 Guideline for those with altered immunocompetence was used to determine accuracy of vaccine knowledge and practices.

          Results: Forty-four percent of providers self-reported adherence to the ACIP guidelines for inactive vaccines and 22% to the guidelines for live vaccines. Thirty-two percent of parents/guardians reported knowledge that aligned with the ACIP guidelines for inactive vaccines and 1% for live vaccines. Subjects residing in the Midwest and provider recommendations for vaccines were positive predictors of vaccine adherence ( p < 0.001 and p 0.02, respectively).

          Conclusions: Vaccine recommendation by medical providers is paramount in vaccine adherence among pediatric patients with NS. This study identifies potential educational opportunities for medical subspecialty providers and family caregivers about immunization recommendations for immunosuppressed patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: new guidelines from KDIGO.

          The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on glomerulonephritis (GN) is intended to assist the practitioner caring for patients with GN. Two chapters of this guideline focus specifically on nephrotic syndrome in children. Guideline development followed a thorough evidence review, and management recommendations and suggestions were based on the best available evidence. Critical appraisal of the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Chapters 3 and 4 of the guideline focus on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children aged 1-18 years. Guideline recommendations for children who have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SNSS), defined by their response to corticosteroid therapy with complete remission, are addressed here. Recommendations for those with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (i.e., do not achieve complete remission) are discussed in the companion article. Limitations of the evidence, including the paucity of large-scale randomized controlled trials, are discussed. This article provides a short description of the KDIGO process, the guideline recommendations for treatment of SSNS in children and a brief review of relevant treatment trials related to each recommendation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Serum immunoglobulins in the nephrotic syndrome. A possible cause of minimal-change nephrotic syndrome.

            To assess immunologic factors in the pathogenesis of idiopathic minimal-change nephrotic syndrome (INS), serum immunoglobulin concentrations were measured in 37 children with this syndrome and compared with those found in 36 with nephrotic syndrome secondary to chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). Serum IgG and IgA levels were significantly reduced in nephrotic patients with either INS or CGN, IgG averaging 18.5 and 25.9 per cent of normal (P less than 0.001) and IgA 59.8 and 44.1 per cent of normal (P less than 0.01) respectively. Values increased after treatment of INS with prednisone, but mean values remained low. Serum IgM concentrations in INS averaged more than twice normal before, during, and after successful treatment with steroids. Patients with CGN did not have equivalent elevations of serum IgM. Thus, the primary defect in INS may be immunologic and could consist of deficiency in the T-cell function that mediates conversion of IgM synthesis to IgG synthesis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger — United States, 2020

              At its October 2019 meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)* approved the 2020 Recommended Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule for Ages 18 Years or Younger. The 2020 child and adolescent immunization schedule summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes from the 2019 immunization schedule † on the cover page, three tables, and notes found on the CDC immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/index.html). Health care providers are advised to use the tables and the notes together. This immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html) and approved by the CDC Director, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and, for the first time, the American College of Nurse-Midwives. ACIP’s recommendations on use of each vaccine are developed after in-depth reviews of vaccine-related data, including the epidemiology and burden of the vaccine-preventable disease, vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, vaccine safety, quality of evidence, feasibility of program implementation, and economic analyses of immunization policy ( 1 ). The child and adolescent immunization schedule is published annually to consolidate and summarize updates to ACIP recommendations on vaccination of children and adolescents and to assist health care providers in implementing current ACIP recommendations. The use of vaccine trade names in this report and in the child and adolescent immunization schedule is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement by ACIP or CDC. For further guidance on the use of each vaccine, including contraindications and precautions, health care providers are referred to the respective ACIP vaccine recommendations at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. Providers should be aware that changes in recommendations for specific vaccines can occur between annual updates to the child and adolescent immunization schedule. If errors or omissions are discovered within the child and adolescent schedule, CDC posts revised versions on the CDC immunization schedule website. § Printable versions of the 2020 child and adolescent immunization schedule and ordering instructions are available on the immunization schedule website at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html. Changes in the 2020 Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule Changes in the 2020 child and adolescent immunization schedule for persons aged 18 years or younger include new or updated ACIP recommendations for hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) ( 2 ); influenza vaccine ( 3 ); meningococcal B vaccine (MenB) ( 2 ); and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) ( 4 ). Changes also include clarification of the recommendations for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), hepatitis B vaccine (HepB), meningococcal ACWY vaccine (MenACWY), and poliovirus vaccine. Following are the changes to the cover page, Tables 1–3, and the Vaccine Notes. Cover page The American College of Nurse-Midwives has been added to the list of organizations that approve the child and adolescent immunization schedule. Trademark symbols (®) were added to all vaccine trade names. Table 1 HepA row: The bar for persons aged 2–18 years has been changed to solid green to denote the recommendation for routine catch-up immunization for all persons in this age group. HPV row: An asterisk has been added to the blue bar that appears for children aged 9–10 years to indicate that for this group, the HPV vaccine series can be started at the clinician’s discretion. The text that defines the blue box in the table’s legend has been edited and now reads “Recommended based on shared clinical decision-making or *can be used in this age group.” Legend: The text that defines the gray box has been edited and now reads “No recommendation/not applicable.” Table 2 Meningococcal rows: The letters “ACWY” were added to clarify that these catch-up intervals apply only to MenACWY and not to MenB. Table 3 Hep A row: All boxes now appear yellow to denote the recommendation for routine vaccination for all persons aged 18 years or younger, including those with the medical indications outlined in the table. MenACWY row: The pregnancy box is now yellow, because the meningococcal vaccine may be administered to pregnant women, if indicated. Legend: The text that defines the red box has been edited and now reads “Not recommended/contraindicated—vaccine should not be administered.” The text that defines the gray box has been edited and now reads “No recommendation/not applicable.” Vaccine Notes DTaP: To clarify the recommendations for catch-up vaccination, the note has been updated to indicate that dose 5 is not necessary if dose 4 was administered at age 4 years or older AND at least 6 months after dose 3. Hib: A bullet has been added to note that catch-up vaccination is not recommended for previously unvaccinated children aged 5 years (60 months) or older who are not at high risk. HepA: The note was revised to include the recommendation that all children and adolescents aged 2 through 18 years who have not previously received Hep A should receive catch-up vaccination and complete a 2-dose series. HepB: A “Special situations” section has been added which contains information regarding populations for whom revaccination might be recommended. The ACIP HepB recommendations are referenced for detailed revaccination recommendations. Influenza vaccine: The note has been updated to reflect the recommendations for the 2019–20 influenza season. The “Routine vaccination” section was reformatted to more clearly outline circumstances under which 1 or 2 doses of influenza vaccine are recommended. In addition, the bullet that outlines circumstances under which live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) should not be used was reformatted into a bulleted list. MenACWY: Guidance regarding adolescent vaccination for children who received MenACWY before age 10 years has been added to the note. MenB: Booster doses are now recommended for persons aged ≥10 years with complement deficiency, those who use complement inhibitors, persons with asplenia, persons who are microbiologists, and persons determined by public health officials to be at increased risk during an outbreak. The MenB note has been updated to include a link to the detailed recommendations. Poliovirus vaccination: Detailed information has been added regarding which oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) doses may be counted toward the U.S. vaccination requirements. Tdap: The note has been updated to allow either Td or Tdap, as an option for decennial tetanus booster doses and catch-up series doses in persons who have previously received Tdap. In addition, the note has been edited to reflect recent updates to the clinical guidance for children aged 7 through 18 years who received doses of Tdap or DTaP at age 7 through 10 years. A dose of Tdap or DTaP administered at age 10 years may now be counted as the adolescent Tdap booster. A dose of Tdap or DTaP administered at age 7 through 9 years should not be counted as the adolescent dose, and Tdap should be administered at age 11–12 years. Additional Information The Recommended Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule, United States, 2020 is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html. The full ACIP recommendations for each vaccine are also available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. All vaccines identified in Tables 1, 2, and 3 (except DTaP, rotavirus, and poliovirus vaccines) also appear in the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older, United States, 2020. ¶ The notes for vaccines that appear in both the adult immunization schedule and the child and adolescent immunization schedule have been harmonized to the greatest extent possible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                05 February 2021
                2020
                : 8
                : 619548
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, United States
                [2] 2Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, SC, United States
                [3] 3Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, United States
                [4] 4Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                [5] 5Levine Children's Hospital at Atrium Health , Charlotte, NC, United States
                [6] 6Driscoll Children's Hospital , Corpus Christi, TX, United States
                [7] 7Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Akron Children's Hospital , Akron, OH, United States
                [8] 8Pediatric Specialists of Virginia , Fairfax, VA, United States
                [9] 9Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University , Washington, DC, United States
                [10] 10Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University , New Orleans, LA, United States
                [11] 11Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University , Hamilton, ON, Canada
                [12] 12Division of Nephrology, Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus, OH, United States
                [13] 13Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Stony Brook Children's Hospital and Renaissance School of Medicine , Stony Brook, NY, United States
                [14] 14Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Tim Ulinski, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, France

                Reviewed by: Christopher Esezobor, University of Lagos, Nigeria; Se Jin Park, Yonsei University, South Korea

                *Correspondence: Cheryl L. Tran tran.cheryl2@ 123456mayo.edu

                This article was submitted to Pediatric Nephrology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2020.619548
                7901920
                33634053
                db850c29-b149-45d2-af18-696809e4bbe3
                Copyright © 2021 Tran, Selewski, Oh, Troost, Massengill, Al-Akash, Mahesh, Amin, Ashoor, Chanchlani, Kallash, Woroniecki and Gipson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 24 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 33, Pages: 11, Words: 7066
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences 10.13039/100006108
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Original Research

                nephrotic syndrome,children,immunization,immunosuppression,education

                Comments

                Comment on this article