2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Optimizing patients’ total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) experience is as crucial for providing high quality care as improving safety and clinical effectiveness. Yet, little evidence is available on patient experience in standard-inpatient and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-outpatient programs. Therefore, this study aimed to gain a more in-depth understanding of the patient experience of ERAS-outpatient programs in comparison to standard-inpatient programs.

          Methods

          We conducted a convergent mixed methods study of 48 consecutive patients who experienced both standard-inpatient and ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA contralaterally. A reflective thematic analysis was conducted based on data collected via a questionnaire. Bivariate correlations between the patient experience and patients’ characteristics, clinical outcomes and care components satisfaction were performed. Then, the quantitative and qualitative data were integrated together.

          Results

          The theme Support makes the difference for better and for worse was identified by patients as crucial to their experience in both joint replacement programs. On the other hand, patients identified 3 themes distinguishing their ERAS-outpatient from their standard-inpatient experience: 1) Minimizing inconvenience, 2) Home sweet home and 3) Returning to normal function and activities. Potential optimization expressed by patients were to receive more preoperative information, additional postoperative rehabilitation sessions, and ensuring better coherence of care between hospital and home care teams. Weak to moderate positive and statistically significant correlations were found between patients’ THA/TKA experience and satisfaction with pain management, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, home care, and overall results (r s = + [0.36–0.66], p-value < 0.01).

          Conclusion

          Whatever the perioperative program, the key to improving patients’ THA/TKA experience lies in improving support throughout the care episode. However, compared to standard-inpatient care, the ERAS-outpatient program improves patients’ experience by providing dedicated support in postoperative care, reducing postoperative inconvenience, optimizing pain management, returning home sooner, and recovering and regaining function sooner. Patients’ THA/TKA experience could further be enhanced by optimizing the information provided to the patient, the rehabilitation program and the coherence between care teams.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04847-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

            Objective To explore evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness outcomes. Design Systematic review. Setting A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care including hospitals and primary care centres. Participants A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures A broad range of patient safety and clinical effectiveness outcomes including mortality, physical symptoms, length of stay and adherence to treatment. Results This study, summarising evidence from 55 studies, indicates consistent positive associations between patient experience, patient safety and clinical effectiveness for a wide range of disease areas, settings, outcome measures and study designs. It demonstrates positive associations between patient experience and self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes; adherence to recommended clinical practice and medication; preventive care (such as health-promoting behaviour, use of screening services and immunisation); and resource use (such as hospitalisation, length of stay and primary-care visits). There is some evidence of positive associations between patient experience and measures of the technical quality of care and adverse events. Overall, it was more common to find positive associations between patient experience and patient safety and clinical effectiveness than no associations. Conclusions The data presented display that patient experience is positively associated with clinical effectiveness and patient safety, and support the case for the inclusion of patient experience as one of the central pillars of quality in healthcare. It supports the argument that the three dimensions of quality should be looked at as a group and not in isolation. Clinicians should resist sidelining patient experience as too subjective or mood-oriented, divorced from the ‘real’ clinical work of measuring safety and effectiveness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.

              Optimization of postoperative outcome requires the application of evidence-based principles of care carefully integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program. To assess, synthesize, and discuss implementation of "fast-track" recovery programs. Medline MBASE (January 1966-May 2007) and the Cochrane library (January 1966-May 2007) were searched using the following keywords: fast-track, enhanced recovery, accelerated rehabilitation, and multimodal and perioperative care. In addition, the synthesis on the many specific interventions and organizational and implementation issues were based on data published within the past 5 years from major anesthesiological and surgical journals, using systematic reviews where appropriate instead of multiple references of original work. Based on an increasing amount of multinational, multicenter cohort studies, randomized studies, and meta-analyses, the concept of the "fast-track methodology" has uniformly provided a major enhancement in recovery leading to decreased hospital stay and with an apparent reduction in medical morbidity but unaltered "surgery-specific" morbidity in a variety of procedures. However, despite being based on a combination of evidence-based unimodal principles of care, recent surveys have demonstrated slow adaptation and implementation of the fast-track methodology. Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology significantly enhances postoperative recovery and reduces morbidity, and should therefore be more widely adopted. Further improvement is expected by future integration of minimal invasive surgery, pharmacological stress-reduction, and effective multimodal, nonopioid analgesia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pa.vendittoli@me.com
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                23 November 2021
                23 November 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 978
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.14848.31, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, , Université de Montréal, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.14848.31, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Surgery Department, , Université de Montréal, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.414216.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0742 1666, Centre de recherche de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, ; Quebec Montreal, Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.14848.31, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, , Université de Montréal, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.420709.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9810 9995, Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.14848.31, ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ), , Université de Montréal, ; Montreal, Quebec Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.23856.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8390, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, , Université Laval, ; Quebec, Canada
                [8 ]GRID grid.23856.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8390, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), ; Quebec, Canada
                [9 ]Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia USA
                [10 ]Duval Orthopaedic Clinic, Laval, Quebec Canada
                Article
                4847
                10.1186/s12891-021-04847-9
                8611950
                34814889
                db922272-cd96-4e33-a905-aea07e922094
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 3 June 2021
                : 5 November 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Orthopedics
                arthroplasty, replacement, knee,arthroplasty, replacement, hip,enhanced recovery after surgery,fast-track,outpatient,patient experience,patient outcome assessment,mixed methods research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content129

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors396