134
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Leadership is important in the implementation of innovation in business, health, and allied health care settings. Yet there is a need for empirically validated organizational interventions for coordinated leadership and organizational development strategies to facilitate effective evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. This paper describes the initial feasibility, acceptability, and perceived utility of the Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) intervention. A transdisciplinary team of investigators and community stakeholders worked together to develop and test a leadership and organizational strategy to promote effective leadership for implementing EBPs.

          Methods

          Participants were 12 mental health service team leaders and their staff ( n = 100) from three different agencies that provide mental health services to children and families in California, USA. Supervisors were randomly assigned to the 6-month LOCI intervention or to a two-session leadership webinar control condition provided by a well-known leadership training organization. We utilized mixed methods with quantitative surveys and qualitative data collected via surveys and a focus group with LOCI trainees.

          Results

          Quantitative and qualitative analyses support the LOCI training and organizational strategy intervention in regard to feasibility, acceptability, and perceived utility, as well as impact on leader and supervisee-rated outcomes.

          Conclusions

          The LOCI leadership and organizational change for implementation intervention is a feasible and acceptable strategy that has utility to improve staff-rated leadership for EBP implementation. Further studies are needed to conduct rigorous tests of the proximal and distal impacts of LOCI on leader behaviors, implementation leadership, organizational context, and implementation outcomes. The results of this study suggest that LOCI may be a viable strategy to support organizations in preparing for the implementation and sustainment of EBP.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

          The Second Edition of this best-selling textbook continues to offer immensely practical advice and technical expertise that will aid researchers in analyzing and interpreting their collected data, and ultimately build theory from it. The authors provide a step-by-step guide to the research act. Full of definitions and illustrative examples, the book presents criteria for evaluating a study as well as responses to common questions posed by students of qualitative research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity.

              This study provided a comprehensive examination of the full range of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. Results (based on 626 correlations from 87 sources) revealed an overall validity of .44 for transformational leadership, and this validity generalized over longitudinal and multisource designs. Contingent reward (.39) and laissez-faire (-.37) leadership had the next highest overall relations; management by exception (active and passive) was inconsistently related to the criteria. Surprisingly, there were several criteria for which contingent reward leadership had stronger relations than did transformational leadership. Furthermore, transformational leadership was strongly correlated with contingent reward (.80) and laissez-faire (-.65) leadership. Transformational and contingent reward leadership generally predicted criteria controlling for the other leadership dimensions, although transformational leadership failed to predict leader job performance. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gaarons@ucsd.edu
                mehrhart@mail.sdsu.edu
                lfarahnak@ucsd.edu
                hurlburt@usc.edu
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                16 January 2015
                16 January 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 1
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA USA
                [ ]Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA USA
                [ ]Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA USA
                [ ]School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
                [ ]Center for Organizational Research on Implementation and Leadership, San Diego, CA USA
                Article
                192
                10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y
                4310135
                25592163
                dd0b78b8-bf1e-4aff-9bb5-c0174383c426
                © Aarons et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

                History
                : 27 August 2013
                : 10 December 2014
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                leadership,organization,evidence-based practice,organizational development,organizational culture,organizational climate

                Comments

                Comment on this article