12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human V6 Integrates Visual and Extra-Retinal Cues during Head-Induced Gaze Shifts

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , ,   1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , ∗∗
      iScience
      Elsevier
      Neuroscience, Sensory Neuroscience, Techniques in Neuroscience

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          A key question in vision research concerns how the brain compensates for self-induced eye and head movements to form the world-centered, spatiotopic representations we perceive. Although human V3A and V6 integrate eye movements with vision, it is unclear which areas integrate head motion signals with visual retinotopic representations, as fMRI typically prevents head movement executions. Here we examined whether human early visual cortex V3A and V6 integrate these signals. A previously introduced paradigm allowed participant head movement during trials, but stabilized the head during data acquisition utilizing the delay between blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) and neural signals. Visual stimuli simulated either a stable environment or one with arbitrary head-coupled visual motion. Importantly, both conditions were matched in retinal and head motion. Contrasts revealed differential responses in human V6. Given the lack of vestibular responses in primate V6, these results suggest multi-modal integration of visual with neck efference copy signals or proprioception in V6.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Setup with head-mounted goggles and head movement during fMRI

          • Simulation of forward flow in stable or unstable world during head rotation

          • Human V6 integrates visual self-motion with head motion signals

          • Likely mediated by efference copy or proprioception as V6 lacks vestibular input

          Abstract

          Neuroscience; Sensory Neuroscience; Techniques in Neuroscience

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Space and attention in parietal cortex.

          The space around us is represented not once but many times in parietal cortex. These multiple representations encode locations and objects of interest in several egocentric reference frames. Stimulus representations are transformed from the coordinates of receptor surfaces, such as the retina or the cochlea, into the coordinates of effectors, such as the eye, head, or hand. The transformation is accomplished by dynamic updating of spatial representations in conjunction with voluntary movements. This direct sensory-to-motor coordinate transformation obviates the need for a single representation of space in environmental coordinates. In addition to representing object locations in motoric coordinates, parietal neurons exhibit strong modulation by attention. Both top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of attention contribute to the enhancement of visual responses. The saliance of a stimulus is the primary factor in determining the neural response to it. Although parietal neurons represent objects in motor coordinates, visual responses are independent of the intention to perform specific motor acts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd.

            Human observers combine multiple sensory cues synergistically to achieve greater perceptual sensitivity, but little is known about the underlying neuronal mechanisms. We recorded the activity of neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) area during a task in which trained monkeys combined visual and vestibular cues near-optimally to discriminate heading. During bimodal stimulation, MSTd neurons combined visual and vestibular inputs linearly with subadditive weights. Neurons with congruent heading preferences for visual and vestibular stimuli showed improvements in sensitivity that parallel behavioral effects. In contrast, neurons with opposite preferences showed diminished sensitivity under cue combination. Responses of congruent cells were more strongly correlated with monkeys' perceptual decisions than were responses of opposite cells, suggesting that the monkey monitored the activity of congruent cells to a greater extent during cue integration. These findings show that perceptual cue integration occurs in nonhuman primates and identify a population of neurons that may form its neural basis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements.

              It is essential to keep track of the movements we make, and one way to do that is to monitor correlates, or corollary discharges, of neuronal movement commands. We hypothesized that a previously identified pathway from brainstem to frontal cortex might carry corollary discharge signals. We found that neuronal activity in this pathway encodes upcoming eye movements and that inactivating the pathway impairs sequential eye movements consistent with loss of corollary discharge without affecting single eye movements. These results identify a pathway in the brain of the primate Macaca mulatta that conveys corollary discharge signals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                iScience
                iScience
                iScience
                Elsevier
                2589-0042
                08 September 2018
                28 September 2018
                08 September 2018
                : 7
                : 191-197
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Vision and Cognition Lab, Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 25, Tübingen 72076, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
                [3 ]Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen 72076, Germany
                [4 ]Centre for Integrative Neuroscience & MEG Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author andreas.schindler@ 123456tuebingen.mpg.de
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author andreas.bartels@ 123456tuebingen.mpg.de
                [5]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S2589-0042(18)30139-1
                10.1016/j.isci.2018.09.004
                6153141
                30267680
                dfa15396-1560-46bd-8f8f-ad5937344fe8
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 8 June 2018
                : 13 July 2018
                : 4 September 2018
                Categories
                Article

                neuroscience,sensory neuroscience,techniques in neuroscience

                Comments

                Comment on this article