9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cancer and pH Dynamics: Transcriptional Regulation, Proteostasis, and the Need for New Molecular Tools

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          As tumors grow, cancer cells must overcome the normal signals designed to keep cell growth in check. Most cancer cells do this by turning off proteins that prevent growth or turning on proteins that stimulate growth through mutation but also through changes in the levels of these proteins inside cells. This review article summarizes recent research that suggests the acidity or basicity (pH) of the environment inside cancer cells may allow cancer cells to specifically stabilize proteins that help them grow and remove proteins that induce cell death. We also discuss new research tools that allow us to measure and manipulate pH in cells to better understand the role pH plays in enhancing cancer growth and progression.

          Abstract

          An emerging hallmark of cancer cells is dysregulated pH dynamics. Recent work has suggested that dysregulated intracellular pH (pHi) dynamics enable diverse cancer cellular behaviors at the population level, including cell proliferation, cell migration and metastasis, evasion of apoptosis, and metabolic adaptation. However, the molecular mechanisms driving pH-dependent cancer-associated cell behaviors are largely unknown. In this review article, we explore recent literature suggesting pHi dynamics may play a causative role in regulating or reinforcing tumorigenic transcriptional and proteostatic changes at the molecular level, and discuss outcomes on tumorigenesis and tumor heterogeneity. Most of the data we discuss are population-level analyses; lack of single-cell data is driven by a lack of tools to experimentally change pHi with spatiotemporal control. Data is also sparse on how pHi dynamics play out in complex in vivo microenvironments. To address this need, at the end of this review, we cover recent advances for live-cell pHi measurement at single-cell resolution. We also discuss the essential role for tool development in revealing mechanisms by which pHi dynamics drive tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Regulation of cancer cell metabolism.

          Interest in the topic of tumour metabolism has waxed and waned over the past century of cancer research. The early observations of Warburg and his contemporaries established that there are fundamental differences in the central metabolic pathways operating in malignant tissue. However, the initial hypotheses that were based on these observations proved inadequate to explain tumorigenesis, and the oncogene revolution pushed tumour metabolism to the margins of cancer research. In recent years, interest has been renewed as it has become clear that many of the signalling pathways that are affected by genetic mutations and the tumour microenvironment have a profound effect on core metabolism, making this topic once again one of the most intense areas of research in cancer biology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Its Receptor (VEGFR) Signaling in Angiogenesis: A Crucial Target for Anti- and Pro-Angiogenic Therapies.

            The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) have been shown to play major roles not only in physiological but also in most pathological angiogenesis, such as cancer. VEGF belongs to the PDGF supergene family characterized by 8 conserved cysteines and functions as a homodimer structure. VEGF-A regulates angiogenesis and vascular permeability by activating 2 receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk1 in mice). On the other hand, VEGF-C/VEGF-D and their receptor, VEGFR-3 (Flt-4), mainly regulate lymphangiogenesis. The VEGF family includes other interesting variants, one of which is the virally encoded VEGF-E and another is specifically expressed in the venom of the habu snake (Trimeresurus flavoviridis). VEGFRs are distantly related to the PDGFR family; however, they are unique with respect to their structure and signaling system. Unlike members of the PDGFR family that strongly stimulate the PI3K-Akt pathway toward cell proliferation, VEGFR-2, the major signal transducer for angiogenesis, preferentially utilizes the PLCγ-PKC-MAPK pathway for signaling. The VEGF-VEGFR system is an important target for anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer and is also an attractive system for pro-angiogenic therapy in the treatment of neuronal degeneration and ischemic diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clonal evolution in cancer.

              Cancers evolve by a reiterative process of clonal expansion, genetic diversification and clonal selection within the adaptive landscapes of tissue ecosystems. The dynamics are complex, with highly variable patterns of genetic diversity and resulting clonal architecture. Therapeutic intervention may destroy cancer clones and erode their habitats, but it can also inadvertently provide a potent selective pressure for the expansion of resistant variants. The inherently Darwinian character of cancer is the primary reason for this therapeutic failure, but it may also hold the key to more effective control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                25 September 2020
                October 2020
                : 12
                : 10
                : 2760
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA; bczowski@ 123456nd.edu (B.J.C.); rromero2@ 123456nd.edu (R.R.-M.); ktrull@ 123456nd.edu (K.J.T.)
                [2 ]Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: kwhite6@ 123456nd.edu
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-0434
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-0111
                Article
                cancers-12-02760
                10.3390/cancers12102760
                7601256
                32992762
                e147be77-9859-4a62-8550-1a597c4177e7
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 August 2020
                : 21 September 2020
                Categories
                Review

                cancer,ph regulation,transcription,proteostasis,tumorigenesis,biosensors,molecular tools

                Comments

                Comment on this article