4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification of maternal depression risk from natural language collected in a mobile health app

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Depression is one of the most common pregnancy complications, affecting approximately 15% of pregnant people. While valid psychometric measures of depression risk exist, they are not consistently administered at routine prenatal care, exacerbating the problem of adequate detection. The language we use in daily life offers a window into our psychological wellbeing. In this longitudinal observational cohort study of prenatal patients using a prenatal care mobile health app, we examine how features of app-entered natural language and other app-entered patient-reported data may be used as indicators for validated depression risk measures. Patient participants (n=1091) were prescribed a prenatal care app as part of a quality improvement initiative in the UPMC healthcare system from September 2019 – May 2022. Natural language from open-ended writing prompts in the app and self-reported daily mood, were entered by patients using the tool. Participants also completed a validated measure of depression risk - the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) - at least once in their pregnancy. A variety of natural language processing tools were used to score sentiment, categorize topics, and capture other semantic and syntactic information from text entries. LASSO was used to model the relationship between the natural language features and depression risk. Open-ended text within a 30-day and 60-day timeframe of completing an EPDS was found to be moderately predictive of moderate to severe depression risk (AUROC=0.66 and 0.67, for each respective timeframe). When combined with average daily reported mood, open-ended text showed good predictive power (AUROC=0.87). Consistently predictive language features across all models included themes of “money” and “sadness.” The combination of natural language and other user-reported data collected through a mobile health app offers an opportunity for identifying depression risk among a pregnant population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

          The development of a 10-item self-report scale (EPDS) to screen for Postnatal Depression in the community is described. After extensive pilot interviews a validation study was carried out on 84 mothers using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for depressive illness obtained from Goldberg's Standardised Psychiatric Interview. The EPDS was found to have satisfactory sensitivity and specificity, and was also sensitive to change in the severity of depression over time. The scale can be completed in about 5 minutes and has a simple method of scoring. The use of the EPDS in the secondary prevention of Postnatal Depression is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence

              We systematically review evidence on the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression and compare these rates with those of depression in women at non-childbearing times. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociofile for English-language articles published from 1980 through March 2004, conducted hand searches of bibliographies, and consulted with experts. We included cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies from developed countries that assessed women for depression during pregnancy or the first year postpartum with a structured clinical interview. Of the 109 articles reviewed, 28 met our inclusion criteria. For major and minor depression (major depression alone), the combined point prevalence estimates from meta-analyses ranged from 6.5% to 12.9% (1.0-5.6%) at different trimesters of pregnancy and months in the first postpartum year. The combined period prevalence shows that as many as 19.2% (7.1%) of women have a depressive episode (major depressive episode) during the first 3 months postpartum; most of these episodes have onset following delivery. All estimates have wide 95% confidence intervals, showing significant uncertainty in their true levels. No conclusions could be made regarding the relative incidence of depression among pregnant and postpartum women compared with women at non-childbearing times. To better delineate periods of peak prevalence and incidence for perinatal depression and identify high risk subpopulations, we need studies with larger and more representative samples.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101537771
                38316
                Procedia Comput Sci
                Procedia Comput Sci
                Procedia computer science
                1877-0509
                20 January 2023
                2022
                21 September 2022
                26 January 2023
                : 206
                : 132-140
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [b ]Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [c ]Naima Health LLC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Tamar Krishnamurti, PhD. tamark@ 123456pitt.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1866994
                10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.092
                9879299
                36712815
                e19ad082-82e3-4410-930d-f11df294e50c

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

                History
                Categories
                Article

                depression,pregnancy,machine learning,mhealth,maternal health,natural language processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article