30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of turbidity on recognition and generalization of predators and non-predators in aquatic ecosystems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent anthropogenic activities have caused a considerable change in the turbidity of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Concomitant with such perturbations are changes in community composition. Understanding the mechanisms through which species interactions are influenced by anthropogenic change has come to the forefront of many ecological disciplines. Here, we examine how a change in the availability of visual information influences the behavior of prey fish exposed to potential predators and non-predators. When fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, were conditioned to recognize predators and non-predators in clear water, they showed a highly sophisticated ability to distinguish predators from non-predators. However, when learning occurred under conditions of increased turbidity, the ability of the prey to learn and generalize recognition of predators and non-predators was severely impaired. Our work highlights that changes at the community level associated with anthropogenic perturbations may be mediated through altered trophic interactions, and highlights the need to closely examine behavioral interactions to understand how species interactions change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

          Scenarios of changes in biodiversity for the year 2100 can now be developed based on scenarios of changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide, climate, vegetation, and land use and the known sensitivity of biodiversity to these changes. This study identified a ranking of the importance of drivers of change, a ranking of the biomes with respect to expected changes, and the major sources of uncertainties. For terrestrial ecosystems, land-use change probably will have the largest effect, followed by climate change, nitrogen deposition, biotic exchange, and elevated carbon dioxide concentration. For freshwater ecosystems, biotic exchange is much more important. Mediterranean climate and grassland ecosystems likely will experience the greatest proportional change in biodiversity because of the substantial influence of all drivers of biodiversity change. Northern temperate ecosystems are estimated to experience the least biodiversity change because major land-use change has already occurred. Plausible changes in biodiversity in other biomes depend on interactions among the causes of biodiversity change. These interactions represent one of the largest uncertainties in projections of future biodiversity change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                ece3
                Ecology and Evolution
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd
                2045-7758
                2045-7758
                February 2013
                27 December 2012
                : 3
                : 2
                : 268-277
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan SK, S7N 5E2, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Biology, Concordia University QC, H4B 1R6, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan SK, S7N 5B4, Canada
                Author notes
                Douglas P. Chivers, Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E2, Canada. Tel: +306-966-4419; Fax: +306-966-4461; E-mail: doug.chivers@ 123456usask.ca

                Funding Information This research was supported by NSERC Discovery Grants to DPC, GEB, and MCOF

                Article
                10.1002/ece3.454
                3586637
                23467451
                e260b438-afe9-4387-ae8f-2c75ec4efb70
                © 2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 24 September 2012
                : 15 November 2012
                : 27 November 2012
                Categories
                Original Research

                Evolutionary Biology
                anthropogenic change,anti-predator behavior,fathead minnows,predator recognition,risk assessment,turbidity

                Comments

                Comment on this article