17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Focused ultrasound–mediated blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease: long-term safety, imaging, and cognitive outcomes

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          MRI-guided low-intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) has been shown to reversibly open the blood-brain barrier (BBB), with the potential to deliver therapeutic agents noninvasively to target brain regions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative conditions. Previously, the authors reported the short-term safety and feasibility of FUS BBB opening of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (EC) in patients with AD. Given the need to treat larger brain regions beyond the hippocampus and EC, brain volumes and locations treated with FUS have now expanded. To evaluate any potential adverse consequences of BBB opening on disease progression, the authors report safety, imaging, and clinical outcomes among participants with mild AD at 6–12 months after FUS treatment targeted to the hippocampus, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe.

          METHODS

          In this open-label trial, participants with mild AD underwent MRI-guided FUS sonication to open the BBB in β-amyloid positive regions of the hippocampus, EC, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe. Participants underwent 3 separate FUS treatment sessions performed 2 weeks apart. Outcome assessments included safety, imaging, neurological, cognitive, and florbetaben β-amyloid PET.

          RESULTS

          Ten participants (range 55–76 years old) completed 30 separate FUS treatments at 2 participating institutions, with 6–12 months of follow-up. All participants had immediate BBB opening after FUS and BBB closure within 24–48 hours. All FUS treatments were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to the procedure. All 10 participants had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, and 7 participants had a follow-up out to 1 year. Changes in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive and Mini-Mental State Examination scores were comparable to those in controls from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PET scans demonstrated an average β-amyloid plaque of 14% in the Centiloid scale in the FUS-treated regions.

          CONCLUSIONS

          This study is the largest cohort of participants with mild AD who received FUS treatment, and has the longest follow-up to date. Safety was demonstrated in conjunction with reversible and repeated BBB opening in multiple cortical and deep brain locations, with a concomitant reduction of β-amyloid. There was no apparent cognitive worsening beyond expectations up to 1 year after FUS treatment, suggesting that the BBB opening treatment in multiple brain regions did not adversely influence AD progression. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings. FUS offers a unique opportunity to decrease amyloid plaque burden as well as the potential to deliver targeted therapeutics to multiple brain regions in patients with neurodegenerative disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

          The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            “Mini-mental state”

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial and ethnic estimates of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in the United States (2015–2060) in adults aged ≥65 years

              Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) cause a high burden of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Age, race, and ethnicity are important risk factors for ADRD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Neurosurgery
                Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
                0022-3085
                1933-0693
                November 01 2022
                November 01 2022
                : 1-9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departments of Neurosurgery,
                [2 ]Neurosciences,
                [3 ]Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry,
                [4 ]Neurology, and
                [5 ]Neuroradiology, WVU Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia;
                [6 ]Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee;
                [7 ]Departments of Radiology and
                [8 ]Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
                [9 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; and
                [10 ]West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
                [11 ]Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York;
                Article
                10.3171/2022.9.JNS221565
                36334289
                e349f851-88e1-49c0-a22a-f1b115734fd6
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article