2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with or without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a post hoc analysis from ORAL Surveillance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Evaluate risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with or without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in ORAL Surveillance.

          Methods

          Patients with RA aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. Hazard rations (HRs) were evaluated for the overall population and by history of ASCVD (exploratory analysis).

          Results

          Risk of MACE, myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death were increased with tofacitinib versus TNFi in ORAL Surveillance. In patients with history of ASCVD (14.7%; 640/4362), MACE incidence was higher with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day (8.3%; 17/204) and 10 mg two times per day (7.7%; 17/222) versus TNFi (4.2%; 9/214). HR (combined tofacitinib doses vs TNFi) was 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 4.14; interaction p values: 0.196 (for HR)/0.059 (for incidence rate difference)). In patients without history of ASCVD, MACE HRs for tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day (2.4%; 30/1251) and 10 mg two times per day (2.8%; 34/1234) versus TNFi (2.3%; 28/1237) were, respectively, 1.03 (0.62 to 1.73) and 1.25 (0.76 to 2.07).

          Conclusions

          This post hoc analysis observed higher MACE risk with tofacitinib versus TNFi in patients with RA and history of ASCVD. Among patients without history of ASCVD, all with prevalent CV risk factors, MACE risk did not appear different with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis and low statistical power, we cannot exclude differential MACE risk for tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi among patients without history of ASCVD, but any absolute risk excess is likely low.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02092467.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

            Circulation
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk

              Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Rheum Dis
                Ann Rheum Dis
                annrheumdis
                ard
                Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0003-4967
                1468-2060
                January 2023
                22 September 2022
                : 82
                : 1
                : 119-129
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine , University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California, USA
                [2 ] departmentCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health , University of Manchester , Manchester, UK
                [3 ] departmentNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester, UK
                [4 ] departmentUniversité de Paris; Department of Rheumatology , Hôpital Cochin; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris , Paris, France
                [5 ] departmentINSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics , PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité , Paris, France
                [6 ] departmentDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine , Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [7 ] departmentDivision of Rheumatology , Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York, New York, USA
                [8 ] departmentDivision of Rheumatology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Biostatistics , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [10 ] Pfizer Ltd , Tadworth, UK
                [11 ] Pfizer Inc , Groton, Connecticut, USA
                [12 ] Pfizer Inc , New York, New York, USA
                [13 ] Pfizer SLU , Madrid, Spain
                [14 ] Pfizer Inc , Oslo, Norway
                [15 ] departmentDivision of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine , University of Debrecen , Debrecen, Hungary
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Christina Charles-Schoeman, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; ccharles@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-7019
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-5642
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-6229
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-6245
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7794-6844
                Article
                annrheumdis-2022-222259
                10.1136/ard-2022-222259
                9811099
                36137735
                e44197d5-7734-41ba-a9ea-89b5b1c4dfd8
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 28 January 2022
                : 11 August 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Pfizer Inc;
                Categories
                Rheumatoid Arthritis
                1506
                2311
                2502
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Immunology
                antirheumatic agents,arthritis, rheumatoid,cardiovascular diseases,therapeutics
                Immunology
                antirheumatic agents, arthritis, rheumatoid, cardiovascular diseases, therapeutics

                Comments

                Comment on this article