9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In cocktail party situations multiple talkers speak simultaneously, which causes listening to be perceptually and cognitively challenging. Such situations can either be static (fixed target talker) or dynamic, meaning the target talker switches occasionally and in a potentially unpredictable way. To shed light on the perceptional and cognitive mechanisms in static and dynamic cocktail party situations, we conducted an analysis of error types that occur during a multi-talker speech recognition test. The error analysis distinguished between misunderstood or omitted words (random errors) and target-masker confusions. To investigate the effects of aging and hearing impairment, we compared data from three listener groups, comprised of young as well as older adults with and without hearing loss. In the static condition, error rates were generally very low, except for the older hearing-impaired listeners. Consistent with the assumption of decreased audibility, they showed a notable amount of random errors. In the dynamic condition, errors increased compared to the static condition, especially immediately following a target talker switch. Those increases were similar for random and confusion errors. The older hearing-impaired listeners showed greater difficulties than the younger adults in trials not preceded by a switch. These results suggest that the load associated with dynamic cocktail party listening affects the ability to focus attention on the talker of interest and the retrieval of words from short-term memory, as indicated by the increased amount of confusion and random errors. This was most pronounced in the older hearing-impaired listeners proposing an interplay of perceptual and cognitive mechanisms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears

            E. Cherry (1953)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

              The Fifth Eriksholm Workshop on "Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy" was convened to develop a consensus among interdisciplinary experts about what is known on the topic, gaps in knowledge, the use of terminology, priorities for future research, and implications for practice. The general term cognitive energy was chosen to facilitate the broadest possible discussion of the topic. It goes back to who described the effects of attention on perception; he used the term psychic energy for the notion that limited mental resources can be flexibly allocated among perceptual and mental activities. The workshop focused on three main areas: (1) theories, models, concepts, definitions, and frameworks; (2) methods and measures; and (3) knowledge translation. We defined effort as the deliberate allocation of mental resources to overcome obstacles in goal pursuit when carrying out a task, with listening effort applying more specifically when tasks involve listening. We adapted Kahneman's seminal (1973) Capacity Model of Attention to listening and proposed a heuristically useful Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Our FUEL incorporates the well-known relationship between cognitive demand and the supply of cognitive capacity that is the foundation of cognitive theories of attention. Our FUEL also incorporates a motivation dimension based on complementary theories of motivational intensity, adaptive gain control, and optimal performance, fatigue, and pleasure. Using a three-dimensional illustration, we highlight how listening effort depends not only on hearing difficulties and task demands but also on the listener's motivation to expend mental effort in the challenging situations of everyday life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trends Hear
                Trends Hear
                TIA
                sptia
                Trends in Hearing
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2331-2165
                18 July 2022
                Jan-Dec 2022
                : 26
                : 23312165221111676
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT-Research, Ringgold 14309, universityUniversity of Cologne; , Cologne, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [3 ]Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ringgold 14309, universityUniversity of Cologne; , Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                [*]Moritz Wächtler, Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT-Research, University of Cologne, Geibelstr. 29-31, D-50931 Cologne, Germany. Email: moritz.waechtler@ 123456uhrmacherinstitut.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-6419
                Article
                10.1177_23312165221111676
                10.1177/23312165221111676
                9297473
                35849353
                e4d1ce87-0171-4732-85db-e50beabe6e95
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 15 January 2022
                : 15 June 2022
                : 18 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: ME 2751/3-1
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2022

                speech perception,multi-talker situation,aging,hearing loss,attention

                Comments

                Comment on this article