21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The neuroscience of suicidal behaviors: what can we expect from endophenotype strategies?

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vulnerability to suicidal behavior (SB) is likely mediated by an underlying genetic predisposition interacting with environmental and probable epigenetic factors throughout the lifespan to modify the function of neuronal circuits, thus rendering an individual more likely to engage in a suicidal act. Improving our understanding of the neuroscience underlying SBs, both attempts and completions, at all developmental stages is crucial for more effective preventive treatments and for better identification of vulnerable individuals. Recent studies have characterized SB using an endophenotype strategy, which aims to identify quantitative measures that reflect genetically influenced stable changes in brain function. In addition to aiding in the functional characterization of susceptibility genes, endophenotypic research strategies may have a wider impact in determining vulnerability to SB, as well as the translation of human findings to animal models, and vice versa. Endophenotypes associated with vulnerability to SB include impulsive/aggressive personality traits and disadvantageous decision making. Deficits in realistic risk evaluation represent key processes in vulnerability to SB. Serotonin dysfunction, indicated by neuroendocrine responses and neuroimaging, is also strongly implicated as a potential endophenotype and is linked with impulsive aggression and disadvantageous decision making. Specific endophenotypes may represent heritable markers for the identification of vulnerable patients and may be relevant targets for successful suicide prevention and treatments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.

          Following damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, humans develop a defect in real-life decision-making, which contrasts with otherwise normal intellectual functions. Currently, there is no neuropsychological probe to detect in the laboratory, and the cognitive and neural mechanisms responsible for this defect have resisted explanation. Here, using a novel task which simulates real-life decision-making in the way it factors uncertainty of premises and outcomes, as well as reward and punishment, we find that prefrontal patients, unlike controls, are oblivious to the future consequences of their actions, and seem to be guided by immediate prospects only. This finding offers, for the first time, the possibility of detecting these patients' elusive impairment in the laboratory, measuring it, and investigating its possible causes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The amygdala response to emotional stimuli: a comparison of faces and scenes.

            As a central fear processor of the brain, the amygdala initiates a cascade of critical physiological and behavioral responses. Neuroimaging studies have shown that the human amygdala responds not only to fearful and angry facial expressions but also to fearful and threatening scenes such as attacks, explosions, and mutilations. Given the relative importance of facial expressions in adaptive social behavior, we hypothesized that the human amygdala would exhibit a stronger response to angry and fearful facial expressions in comparison to other fearful and threatening stimuli. Twelve subjects completed two tasks while undergoing fMRI: matching angry or fearful facial expressions, and matching scenes depicting fearful or threatening situations derived from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). While there was an amygdala response to both facial expressions and IAPS stimuli, direct comparison revealed that the amygdala response to facial expressions was significantly greater than that to IAPS stimuli. Autonomic reactivity, measured by skin conductance responses, was also greater to facial expressions. These results suggest that the human amygdala shows a stronger response to affective facial expressions than to scenes, a bias that should be considered in the design of experimental paradigms interested in probing amygdala function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transl Psychiatry
                Transl Psychiatry
                Translational Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group
                2158-3188
                May 2011
                10 May 2011
                1 May 2011
                : 1
                : 5
                : e7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry, CHRU Montpellier, Inserm U1061, University of Montpellier I , Montpellier, France
                [2 ]simpleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School , Minneapolis, MN, USA
                [3 ]simpleDepartment Psychology, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA
                [4 ]simpleDouglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill Group for Suicide Studies, McGill University , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [5 ]simpleDepartments of Psychiatry, and Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]simpleDepartment of Psychiatry, and Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Room 934D MSTF, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. E-mail: gouldlab@ 123456me.com
                Article
                tp20116
                10.1038/tp.2011.6
                3134241
                21761009
                e648d581-73ec-438e-8198-cf0cd5e4ed22
                Copyright © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

                History
                : 22 March 2011
                : 23 March 2011
                Categories
                Perspective

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                suicide,decision making,orbitofrontal cortex,animal models,biomarker,emotions

                Comments

                Comment on this article