11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of glycemic control on protective responses against hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

      Diabetes Care
      administration & dosage, Humans, Glucose, Hypoglycemia, pharmacology, Insulin, Blood Glucose, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, drug therapy, Epinephrine, Male, Growth Hormone, therapeutic use, Glucagon, metabolism, drug effects, prevention & control, adverse effects, Norepinephrine, Glucose Clamp Technique, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Psychomotor Performance, Middle Aged, chemically induced, Female, Reaction Time

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine the effects of glycemic control on the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Seven poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients (mean HbA1c, 11.3 +/- 1.1%) were studied by stepped hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp (nadir, 2.4 mmol/l) before and after improving glycemic control with insulin treatment. Counterregulatory hormones, symptoms, and four-choice reaction time were measured at each glucose plateau. In patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, counterregulatory hormone responses began at higher plasma glucose levels than did those in healthy subjects (epinephrine, 4.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, P = 0.011). After significant improvement in glycemic control (mean HbA1c, 8.1 +/- 0.9%, P < 0.001) was achieved without severe hypoglycemia, hormonal responses started at much lower plasma glucose levels (e.g., epinephrine, 3.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P = 0.005) and were significantly reduced in magnitude (e.g., area under epinephrine response curve, 306 +/- 93 vs. 690 +/- 107 nmol.min-1.l-1, P = 0.012). This was accompanied by a change in the plasma glucose threshold at which hypoglycemic symptoms first developed from 3.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.0 +/- 0.2 mmol/l (P = 0.019). In contrast, the plasma glucose threshold at which four-choice reaction time deteriorated did not change significantly (3.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P = 0.125). Counterregulatory responses begin at normoglycemia in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Improving glycemic control with insulin therapy normalizes hormonal responses but lowers the plasma glucose levels at which hypoglycemic symptoms develop to levels associated with impairment of four-choice reaction time, a marker of cognitive function. This process potentially increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia, but to a lesser extent than occurs in type 1 disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article