2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Digital Health Innovations to Improve Cardiovascular Disease Care

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose of Review

          To review the current evidence supporting the use of digital health technologies in cardiovascular disease (CVD) care.

          Recent Findings

          Studies have evaluated the impact of the use of digital health technologies to improve CVD outcomes through several modalities: text-messaging programmes, smartphone applications (apps) and wearable devices. Text-messaging programmes are to date the most studied type of digital health interventions, and studies have demonstrated reduced CVD risk and improved medication adherence. Literature supporting the use of smartphone apps is also growing but remains limited, with some studies favouring the use of health apps but others showing negative results. Wearable devices are the latest type of technology investigated, and studies have shown positive outcomes in terms of physical activity and detection of arrhythmias.

          Summary

          Digital health is a growing and evolving area of investigation. To date, the scientific evidence overall supports the use of such technologies in CVD care and management. Future research using new models are needed to continue to evaluate these new technologies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Covid-19 and Health Care’s Digital Revolution

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Background The range of benefits associated with regular physical activity participation is irrefutable. Despite the well-known benefits, physical inactivity remains one of the major contributing factors to ill-health throughout industrialized countries. Traditional lifestyle interventions such as group education or telephone counseling are effective at increasing physical activity participation; however, physical activity levels tend to decline over time. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers that allow users to objectively monitor activity levels are now widely available and may offer an alternative method for assisting individuals to remain physically active. Objective This review aimed to determine the effects of interventions utilizing consumer-based wearable activity trackers on physical activity participation and sedentary behavior when compared with interventions that do not utilize activity tracker feedback. Methods A systematic review was performed searching the following databases for studies that included the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker to improve physical activity participation: Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, and Health Technology Assessments. Controlled trials of adults comparing the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker with other nonactivity tracker–based interventions were included. The main outcome measures were physical activity participation and sedentary behavior. All studies were assessed for risk of bias, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rank the quality of evidence. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed. A random-effects meta-analysis was completed on the included outcome measures to estimate the treatment effect of interventions that included an activity tracker compared with a control group. Results There was a significant increase in daily step count (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.24; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33; P<.001), moderate and vigorous physical activity (SMD 0.27; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.39; P<.001), and energy expenditure (SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.54; P=.03) and a nonsignificant decrease in sedentary behavior (SMD −0.20; 95% CI −0.43 to 0.03; P=.08) following the intervention versus control comparator across all studies in the meta-analyses. In general, included studies were at low risk of bias, except for performance bias. Heterogeneity varied across the included meta-analyses ranging from low (I2=3%) for daily step count through to high (I2=67%) for sedentary behavior. Conclusions Utilizing a consumer-based wearable activity tracker as either the primary component of an intervention or as part of a broader physical activity intervention has the potential to increase physical activity participation. As the effects of physical activity interventions are often short term, the inclusion of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker may provide an effective tool to assist health professionals to provide ongoing monitoring and support.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                karla.santo@einstein.br
                julie.redfern@sydney.edu.au
                Journal
                Curr Atheroscler Rep
                Current Atherosclerosis Reports
                Springer US (New York )
                1523-3804
                1534-6242
                3 October 2020
                2020
                : 22
                : 12
                : 71
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.413562.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0385 1941, Academic Research Organization, , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, ; Av. Albert Einstein 627, Bloco A, 2o subsolo, São Paulo, SP CEP 05652-900 Brazil
                [2 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.415508.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1964 6010, Cardiovascular Division, , The George Institute for Global Health, ; Sydney, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-8865
                Article
                889
                10.1007/s11883-020-00889-x
                7532121
                33009975
                e797844f-fef7-47e6-ab87-9fb609576239
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 10 September 2020
                Categories
                Coronary Heart Disease (S. Virani and S. Naderi, Section Editor)
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

                Immunology
                digital health,ehealth,mhealth,digital technology,cardiovascular disease
                Immunology
                digital health, ehealth, mhealth, digital technology, cardiovascular disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article