ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Researchers

Search
Advanced search

53

views

    

0

recommends

0

shares

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Neopolyploidy in Flowering Plants

Author(s): Justin Ramsey ¹ ^, ² ^, ³ , Douglas W. Schemske ¹ ^, ² ^, ³

Publication date Created: November 2002

Publication date (Print): November 2002

Journal: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Publisher: Annual Reviews

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 144

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms.

J Masterson (1994)

Three published estimates of the frequency of polyploidy in angiosperms (30 to 35 percent, 47 percent, and 70 to 80 percent) were tested by estimating the genome size of extinct woody angiosperms with the use of fossil guard cell size as a proxy for cellular DNA content. The inferred chromosome numbers of these extinct species suggest that seven to nine is the primitive haploid chromosome number of angiosperms and that most angiosperms (approximately 70 percent) have polyploidy in their history.

0 comments Cited 233 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Polyploidy and Novelty in Flowering Plants

Donald Levin (1983)

0 comments Cited 209 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Minority Cytotype Exclusion in Local Plant Populations

Donald Levin (1975)

0 comments Cited 153 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abbreviated Title: Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

Publisher: Annual Reviews

ISSN (Print): 0066-4162

Publication date Created: November 2002

Publication date (Print): November 2002

Volume: 33

Issue: 1

Pages: 589-639

Affiliations

[1 ]Department of Botany, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195-5325; email:

[2 ]Present address: Department of Botany, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada; email:

[3 ]Department of Plant Biology and Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1312; email:

Article

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437

SO-VID: e8766fe8-c5ff-48eb-b81f-bfa3b99942f0

Copyright © © 2002

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article