5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adaptations of the lower back to bipedalism are frequently discussed but infrequently demonstrated in early fossil hominins. Newly discovered lumbar vertebrae contribute to a near-complete lower back of Malapa Hominin 2 (MH2), offering additional insights into posture and locomotion in Australopithecus sediba. We show that MH2 possessed a lower back consistent with lumbar lordosis and other adaptations to bipedalism, including an increase in the width of intervertebral articular facets from the upper to lower lumbar column (‘pyramidal configuration’). These results contrast with some recent work on lordosis in fossil hominins, where MH2 was argued to demonstrate no appreciable lordosis (‘hypolordosis’) similar to Neandertals. Our three-dimensional geometric morphometric (3D GM) analyses show that MH2’s nearly complete middle lumbar vertebra is human-like in overall shape but its vertebral body is somewhat intermediate in shape between modern humans and great apes. Additionally, it bears long, cranially and ventrally oriented costal (transverse) processes, implying powerful trunk musculature. We interpret this combination of features to indicate that A. sediba used its lower back in both bipedal and arboreal positional behaviors, as previously suggested based on multiple lines of evidence from other parts of the skeleton and reconstructed paleobiology of A. sediba.

          eLife digest

          One of the defining features of humans is our ability to walk comfortably on two legs. To achieve this, our skeletons have evolved certain physical characteristics. For example, the lower part of the human spine has a forward curve that supports an upright posture; whereas the lower backs of chimpanzees and other apes – which walk around on four limbs and spend much of their time in trees – lack this curvature . Studying the fossilized back bones of ancient human remains can help us to understand how we evolved these features, and whether our ancestors moved in a similar way.

          Australopithecus sediba was a close-relative of modern humans that lived about two million years ago. In 2008, fossils from an adult female were discovered at a cave site in South Africa called Malapa. However, the fossils of the lower back region were incomplete, so it was unclear whether the female – referred to as Malapa Hominin 2 (MH2) – had a forward-curving spine and other adaptations needed to walk on two legs.

          Here, Williams et al. report the discovery of new A. sediba fossils from Malapa. The new fossils are mainly bones from the lower back, and they fit together with the previously discovered MH2 fossils, providing a nearly complete lower spine. Analysis of the fossils suggested that MH2 would have had an upright posture and comfortably walked on two legs, and the curvature of their lower back was similar to modern females. However, other aspects of the bones’ shape suggest that as well as walking, A. sediba probably spent a significant amount of time climbing in trees.

          The findings of Williams et al. provide new insights in to our evolutionary history, and ultimately, our place in the natural world around us. Our lower back is prone to injury and pain associated with posture, pregnancy and exercise (or lack thereof). Therefore, understanding how the lower back evolved may help us to learn how to prevent injuries and maintain a healthy back.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Australopithecus sediba: a new species of Homo-like australopith from South Africa.

          Despite a rich African Plio-Pleistocene hominin fossil record, the ancestry of Homo and its relation to earlier australopithecines remain unresolved. Here we report on two partial skeletons with an age of 1.95 to 1.78 million years. The fossils were encased in cave deposits at the Malapa site in South Africa. The skeletons were found close together and are directly associated with craniodental remains. Together they represent a new species of Australopithecus that is probably descended from Australopithecus africanus. Combined craniodental and postcranial evidence demonstrates that this new species shares more derived features with early Homo than any other australopith species and thus might help reveal the ancestor of that genus.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs.

            Owing to the great morphological diversity of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), the study of historical shape change in dog skulls provides an excellent opportunity for investigating the dynamics of morphological evolution. Breed standards make known which features were selected by breeders. Here we use the methods of geometric morphometrics to study change of skull shape in a series of purebred St Bernard dogs spanning nearly 120 years. A regression of shape on time was highly significant and revealed a consistent trend of shape change that corresponded to the features deemed desirable by the breed standard. Historical shape change in St Bernards involves a broadening of the skull and a tilting of the palate and upper jaw relative to the rest of the skull. This trend appears to be linear throughout the entire period and appears to be continuing. Allometry was ruled out as a contributing factor to this change because there was no consistent trend of historical change in skull size and because neither the patterns of static nor ontogenetic allometry corresponded to the historical shape change. The dramatic modification of the St Bernard skull demonstrates that selection can achieve sustained and substantial change and can completely overcome constraints such as allometry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Procrustes Methods in the Statistical Analysis of Shape

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing Editor
                Role: Senior Editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                23 November 2021
                2021
                : 10
                : e70447
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York University New York United States
                [2 ] New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology New York United States
                [3 ] Centre for the Exploration of the Deep Human Journey, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
                [4 ] Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
                [5 ] Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University College Station United States
                [6 ] Department of Anthropology, Chaffey College Rancho Cucamonga United States
                [7 ] Western University of Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Department of Medical Anatomical Sciences Pomona United States
                [8 ] Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa
                [9 ] Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH) Burgos Spain
                [10 ] Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain
                [11 ] Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University Stony Brook United States
                [12 ] Department of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology Old Westbury United States
                [13 ] Department of Anthropology, Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr United States
                [14 ] Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool United Kingdom
                [15 ] Department of Human Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa
                [16 ] Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) Madrid Spain
                [17 ] Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
                [18 ] Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University Durham United States
                Chinese Academy of Sciences China
                Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology Germany
                Chinese Academy of Sciences China
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7860-8962
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-8309
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-0173
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-2940
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-3641
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-3866
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-1831
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-546X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-7090
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6418-6113
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-9472
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-1067
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-3401
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-7629
                Article
                70447
                10.7554/eLife.70447
                8610421
                34812141
                e92f1e45-9144-42f7-9917-f97033d195bc
                © 2021, Williams et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 May 2021
                : 19 October 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005966, Leakey Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011033, Agencia Estatal de Investigación;
                Award ID: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales CSIC PID2020-115854GB-I00
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Evolutionary Biology
                Custom metadata
                Newly recovered lumbar vertebrae belonging to Malapa Hominin 2, an adult female of the fossil hominin species Australopithecus sediba, demonstrate that this individual was adapted to upright posture and bipedal locomotion but also had adaptations for climbing in trees.

                Life sciences
                paleoanthropology,human evolution,bipedalism,vertebral column,lordosis,upright posture,human
                Life sciences
                paleoanthropology, human evolution, bipedalism, vertebral column, lordosis, upright posture, human

                Comments

                Comment on this article