28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Accelerated radiotherapy with carbogen and nicotinamide for laryngeal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial.

      Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
      Administration, Inhalation, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carbon Dioxide, administration & dosage, adverse effects, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, chemistry, mortality, pathology, radiotherapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Disease-Free Survival, Dose Fractionation, Female, Great Britain, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Niacinamide, therapeutic use, Oxygen, Patient Selection, Proportional Hazards Models, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Tumor Markers, Biological, analysis, Vitamin B Complex

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To report the results from a randomized trial comparing accelerated radiotherapy (AR) with accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen inhalation and nicotinamide (ARCON) in laryngeal cancer. Patients with cT2-4 squamous cell laryngeal cancer were randomly assigned to AR (68 Gy within 36 to 38 days) or ARCON. To limit the risk of laryngeal necrosis, ARCON patients received 64 Gy on the laryngeal cartilage. The primary end point was local control. Secondary end points were regional control, larynx preservation, toxicity, disease-free survival, and overall survival. In a translational side study, the hypoxia marker pimonidazole was used to assess the oxygenation status in tumor biopsies. From April 2001 to February 2008, 345 patients were accrued. After a median follow-up of 44 months, local tumor control rate at 5 years was 78% for AR versus 79% for ARCON (P = .80), with larynx preservation rates of 84% and 87%, respectively (P = .48). The 5-year regional control was significantly better with ARCON (93%) compared with AR (86%, P = .04). The improvement in regional control was specifically observed in patients with hypoxic tumors and not in patients with well-oxygenated tumors (100% v 55%, respectively; P = .01). AR and ARCON produced equal levels of toxicity. Despite lack of benefit in local tumor control for advanced laryngeal cancers, a significant gain in regional control rate, with equal levels of toxicity, was observed in favor of ARCON. The poor regional control of patients with hypoxic tumors is specifically countered by ARCON treatment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article