40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reducing Needle Stick Injuries in Healthcare Occupations: An Integrative Review of the Literature

      review-article
      , *
      ISRN Nursing
      International Scholarly Research Network

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Needlestick injuries frequently occur among healthcare workers, introducing high risk of bloodborne pathogen infection for surgeons, assistants, and nurses. This systematic review aims to explore the impact of both educational training and safeguard interventions to reduce needlestick injuries. Several databases were searched including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL and Sciencedirect. Studies were selected if the intervention contained a study group and a control group and were published between 2000 and 2010. Of the fourteen studies reviewed, nine evaluated a double-gloving method, one evaluated the effectiveness of blunt needle, and one evaluated a bloodborne pathogen educational training program. Ten studies reported an overall reduction in glove perforations for the intervention group. In conclusion, this review suggests that both safeguard interventions and educational training programs are effective in reducing the risk of having needlestick injuries. However, more studies using a combination of both safeguards and educational interventions in surgical and nonsurgical settings are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The theory of planned behaviour

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations.

              The objective of this study was to evaluate interventions that reduce or prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations. Cochrane Collaboration search strategies to locate studies that evaluated interventions to reduce needlestick injuries in health care occupations were used. Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: (1) interventions were evaluated in the defined population; (2) interventions were randomized, with a comparison group(s); (3) outcomes were objectively measured and had interpretable data. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. The main outcomes of interest were changes in the number of glove or skin perforations and changes in amount of skin contamination. Three studies found a decrease in glove or skin perforations when double gloves or combinations of gloves were used by surgeons and their assistants. One study found an increase in glove perforations but a decrease in hand contamination. Three studies evaluated the effectiveness of specialized needles in reducing needlestick injuries during surgical wound closure with decreases in glove or skin perforations reported. Protective devices were evaluated in three studies and significant reductions in glove perforations were found with the use of a needleless intravenous system and surgical assist device. One study evaluated a "no-touch" technique used by surgeons during wound closure and found a significant decrease in the number of glove perforations compared to the traditional "hand-in" method of closure. Few randomized controlled trials have been employed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce needlestick injuries in health care occupations. The majority of the studies evaluated interventions during surgical procedures, rather than during patient care on nursing units, probably because the latter is more difficult to observe.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ISRN Nurs
                NURSING
                ISRN Nursing
                International Scholarly Research Network
                2090-5483
                2090-5491
                2011
                31 March 2011
                : 2011
                : 315432
                Affiliations
                School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Brennan McCallum Building A18, NSW 2006, Australia
                Author notes

                Academic Editors: N. M. C. Alexandre and E. Halcomb

                Article
                10.5402/2011/315432
                3169876
                22007320
                eee93f9b-2d2c-441f-8bf2-2b53d52d374f
                Copyright © 2011 L. Yang and B. Mullan.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 8 February 2011
                : 14 March 2011
                Categories
                Review Article

                Nursing
                Nursing

                Comments

                Comment on this article