13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficiency of CIDR-Based Protocols Including GnRH Instead of eCG for Estrus Synchronization in Sheep

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          This study examines the preovulatory and ovulatory events (in terms of the timing of onset of estrus behavior, preovulatory LH surge, and ovulation) and the yields obtained (in terms of ovulation rate, progesterone secretion, and fertility) after insertion of controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices for 5 days and treatment with equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH).

          Abstract

          The present study examined, for meat sheep (Segureña breed; 2–5-years old, mean body score of 3.5 ± 0.5), the timings of onset of estrus behavior, preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and ovulation, and the ovulation rate and fertility obtained after insertion of controlled internal drug release (CIDR) devices for 5 days plus treatment with equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG; single dose at CIDR removal, n = 19 ewes) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH, either in a single dose at 56 h after CIDR removal, group CIDR-GnRH, n = 19 ewes; or in one dose at CIDR insertion and another dose 56 h after CIDR removal, group GnRH-CIDR-GnRH, n = 19 ewes). In all the ewes, the appearance of estrus behavior ranged between 84% and 90% and all females showing estrus signs had subsequent preovulatory LH peaks and ovulations. Onset of these events was earlier in the CIDR-eCG group than in the CIDR-GnRH and GnRH-CIDR-GnRH groups ( p < 0.05). These differences were mainly determined by the onset of estrus behavior, since timing and intervals of LH peak and ovulation were similar among treatments. In fact, the range of ovulations was narrower in the GnRH-CIDR-GnRH group, which suggests better synchronization of follicular growth ( p < 0.05). In conclusion, protocols with two doses of GnRH offer similar yields to eCG protocols.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants

          Reproduction of small ruminants can be controlled by several methods developed in recent decades. Some of these involve administration of hormones that modify the physiological chain of events involved in the sexual cycle. Methods which utilise progesterone or its analogues are based on their effects in the luteal phase of the cycle, simulating the action of natural progesterone produced by the corpus luteum after ovulation, which is responsible for controlling LH secretion from the pituitary. Use of prostaglandins is an alternative method for controlling reproduction by eliminating the corpus luteum and inducing a subsequent follicular phase with ovulation. Finally, the discovery of the properties of melatonin in photoperiod-dependent breeding animals opened up a new methodology to control reproduction in these species, inducing changes in the perception of photoperiod and the annual pattern of reproduction. Use of hormones to induce oestrus has allowed increased use of artificial insemination in small ruminants, a very useful management tool, considering the difficulty of detecting oestrus in these species. At commercial level, synchronisation of oestrus allows control of lambing and kidding, with subsequent synchronisation of weaning of young animals for slaughter. Also, it allows more efficient use of labour and animal facilities. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer programmes are also possible with the use of oestrus synchronisation and artificial insemination. Finally, hormonal treatments have also been used to induce puberty in ewe-lambs and doelings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The differential secretion of FSH and LH: regulation through genes, feedback and packaging.

            While the role of oestradiol and progesterone in the control of GnRH pulsatile secretion and generation of the preovulatory GnRH surge to induce release of the LH surge has been fully investigated, less attention has been given to changes in the pituitary gland that may sensitize gonadotrophs to switch from pulsatile release to surge release of LH, in particular. Furthermore, in the follicular phase while pulsatile secretion of LH is maximal, FSH secretion is reduced, yet both hormones are produced by the same gonadotrophs. The mechanisms whereby this differential release can occur are still unclear. The main regulator of FSH secretion is through the negative feedback effects of oestradiol and inhibin, which directly affect FSHbeta mRNA content and subsequent synthesis of FSH. FSH is then released predominantly via a constitutive pathway and the amount released is closely related to the rate of synthesis. In contrast, while basal LH secretion occurs via a constitutive pathway, the principal release of LH through pulsatile secretion is through the regulated pathway with GnRH stimulating the release of pre-synthesized LH contained in storage granules without significant changes in LHbeta mRNA. Secretogranin II (SgII) is associated with LH in these electron-dense storage granules and LH-SgII granules appear to be the principal form of granule released in response to GnRH through the regulated pathway. At the time of the preovulatory LH surge, granule movement to the gonadotrope cell membrane abutting a capillary, polarization, appears to play an important part in the priming mechanism for release of LH during the preovulatory LH surge in response to the GnRH surge. As there appears to be limited or no gonadotroph cell division in the adult pituitary gland, each gonadotroph passes through this synthesis and secretion pathway repeatedly through successive oestrous cycles. Packaging of LH and FSH into different secretory granules within the same cell is thus pivotal for the differential secretion of these gonadotrophins.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ovarian follicle growth and consequences for fertility in sheep.

              Understanding the pattern of ovarian follicle development is seen as an important step leading to the development of techniques that maximise fertility in sheep. Repeated observations of the growth of individual follicles have led to the understanding that follicles develop in a wave-like pattern during the oestrous cycle, with two to four waves per cycle being the most common. The ease with which follicle waves are described seems to depend on the their frequency and the number of follicles per wave. There is evidence for the largest follicle(s) of a follicle wave inhibiting the development of other follicles; however, in some cases this is not apparent as other follicle waves emerge when a previous large, healthy follicle is still present. Follicle development can be manipulated using exogenous gonadotrophins or progestagens and these have been shown to alter the number or age profile of developing follicles. The ovulation of aged follicles in cattle clearly has a detrimental effect on fertility, but this relationship is less clear and seems to be less critical in sheep. Recent findings at the molecular level show that the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and their receptors are critically involved in the control of ovulation rate, but fully understanding their mechanism remains to be described. This highlights the potential for the integration of molecular and physiological findings to better develop methods to manipulate follicle development and reproduction in sheep.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                03 April 2019
                April 2019
                : 9
                : 4
                : 146
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dpto. Produccion y Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, C/Tirant lo Blanc, 7.46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
                [2 ]Dpto. de Reproduccion Animal, INIA, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n., 28040 Madrid, Spain; bulnes@ 123456inia.es
                [3 ]Dpto. de Toxicologia y Farmacologia, Facultad de Veterinaria, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n., 28040 Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: paula.martinez@ 123456uchceu.es ; Tel.: +34-961-369-000
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-4475
                Article
                animals-09-00146
                10.3390/ani9040146
                6523624
                30987248
                ef2f7351-5b15-4e95-8693-6d11777c3e81
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 March 2019
                : 01 April 2019
                Categories
                Article

                cidr,ecg,estrus synchronization,fertility,gnrh,ovulation,sheep
                cidr, ecg, estrus synchronization, fertility, gnrh, ovulation, sheep

                Comments

                Comment on this article