2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biofeedback Based Home Balance Training can Improve Balance but Not Gait in People with Multiple Sclerosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Impaired balance is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and can be present even in those with a mild disability level. With increasing disability, gait, and balance impairment progress, and lead to increased risk of falls. In some recent studies, interactive commercial video games were used for improving balance, but their limitation is their lack of individual training parameter settings needed for rehabilitation purposes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effect of balance exercise in the home setting using the rehabilitation Homebalance® system.

          Methods

          A single-centre, controlled, single blind study with allocation to intervention group or to control group was utilised. Participants were assessed at baseline, after four weeks of home-based balance training, and follow-up after four weeks. The primary outcomes were the Berg Balance Test (BBT). The secondary outcome measures included the Mini-BESTest, Timed Up, and Go Test (part of Mini-BESTest), and spatio-temporal gait parameter evaluation using the GAITRite instrument. The patient reported outcomes (PRO) included the 12-Item MS Walking Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, and the Falls Efficacy Scale.

          Results

          A total of 39 people with Multiple Sclerosis (10 men) were enrolled into the study. The mean age of participants was 40.69 ± 10.2 years, with a mean disease duration 14.76 ± 9.1 years and mean disability level 3.8 ± 1.9 EDSS (EDSS range 1.5–7). Statistically significant improvements within the home exercise group were present for the BBT and the Mini-BESTest. This improvement was more significant in the subgroup with moderate and higher disability (EDSS 4.5–7). All other gait parameters and PRO did not show any improvement. Follow-up assessment after four weeks showed that the reached improvement persisted for a short time period after finishing the regular training regimen.

          Conclusion

          In comparison with no intervention, a short-term programme of home-based balance training using Homebalance® improved balance but not gait performance in a group of people with MS. It seems that home-based balance training tailored according to individual needs by a physiotherapist may be a future approach to consider for telerehabilitation of people with MS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12).

          To develop a patient-based measure of walking ability in MS. Twelve items describing the impact of MS on walking (12-Item MS Walking Scale [MSWS-12]) were generated from 30 patient interviews, expert opinion, and literature review. Preliminary psychometric evaluation (data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability, validity) was undertaken in the data generated by 602 people from the MS Society membership database. Further psychometric evaluation (including comprehensive validity assessment, responsiveness, and relative efficiency) was conducted in two hospital-based samples: people with primary progressive MS (PPMS; n = 78) and people with relapses admitted for IV steroid treatment (n = 54). In all samples, missing data were low ( or =0.78), scaling assumptions were satisfied, and reliability was high (> or =0.94). Correlations between the MSWS-12 and other scales were consistent with a priori hypotheses. The MSWS-12 (relative efficiency = 1.0) was more responsive than the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis mobility scale (0.72), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical functioning scale (0.33), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (0.03), the 25-ft Timed Walk Test (0.44), and Guy's Neurologic Disability Scale lower limb disability item (0.10). The MSWS-12 satisfies standard criteria as a reliable and valid patient-based measure of the impact of MS on walking. In these samples, the MSWS-12 was more responsive than other walking-based scales.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: what works, what does not, and what is needed.

            Disease-modifying drugs have mostly failed as treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. Management of the disease therefore solely aims to minimise symptoms and, if possible, improve function. The degree to which this approach is based on empirical data derived from studies of progressive disease or whether treatment decisions are based on what is known about relapsing-remitting disease remains unclear. Symptoms rated as important by patients with multiple sclerosis include balance and mobility impairments, weakness, reduced cardiovascular fitness, ataxia, fatigue, bladder dysfunction, spasticity, pain, cognitive deficits, depression, and pseudobulbar affect; a comprehensive literature search shows a notable paucity of studies devoted solely to these symptoms in progressive multiple sclerosis, which translates to few proven therapeutic options in the clinic. A new strategy that can be used in future rehabilitation trials is therefore needed, with the adoption of approaches that look beyond single interventions to concurrent, potentially synergistic, treatments that maximise what remains of neural plasticity in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis.

              The aim of this study was to test concurrent and discriminant validity of several tests of static and dynamic balance in a sample of subjects suffering from MS. A group of 51 patients were enrolled in the study. The following tests were administered: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Hauser Deambulation Index (DI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC). The scales used in this study were initially translated into Italian. The sample of subjects reported a mean of 0.98 (1.8 SD) falls in the month prior to evaluation. The tests demonstrated good concurrent validity: Higher correlation coefficients among tests tapping the same aspect and lower correlation coefficients among tests tapping slightly different aspects. ABC and DHI tests discriminated better than the others between fallers and non-fallers and appeared the best predictors of fall status. BBS and DGI were not as efficient in discriminating between groups. Conversely all tests showed good difference validity in the prediction of patients who used an assistive device. BBS, TUG, DI, DGI, ABC, DHI have acceptable concurrent validity. The scales have poor performance in discriminating between faller and non-faller.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Mult Scler Int
                Mult Scler Int
                MSI
                Multiple Sclerosis International
                Hindawi
                2090-2654
                2090-2662
                2019
                23 December 2019
                : 2019
                : 2854130
                Affiliations
                1Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
                2MS Rehab z.s., Prague, Czech Republic
                3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
                4Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering CTU and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Antonio Bertolotto

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-8724
                Article
                10.1155/2019/2854130
                6942900
                31934450
                efe146fb-3ee9-42a4-b253-465ecfab02e8
                Copyright © 2019 Klara Novotna et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 May 2019
                : 13 September 2019
                : 6 November 2019
                Categories
                Research Article

                Rheumatology
                Rheumatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content102

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors381