14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Blood and Saliva for Prediction of Response to Osimertinib and Disease Progression in EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          ctDNA assay is a promising non-invasive method to detect genomic alterations associated with lung cancer. In this prospective study of 25 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma receiving osimertinib, ctDNA progression predated radiographic progression by 118 days in 11 of 20 patients with disease progression. Saliva-based ctDNA analysis and plasma NGS detected additional patients with ctDNA progression preceding clinical progression, suggesting the potential complementary roles of different ctDNA detection methodologies. Baseline mutant ctDNA level predicted progression-free survival while tumor volume measurements by volumetric CT did not. Serial ctDNA analysis of plasma and saliva is a clinically useful tool to monitor response and resistance to osimertinib.

          Abstract

          Background: We assessed whether serial ctDNA monitoring of plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Three ctDNA technologies—blood-based droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and saliva-based EFIRM liquid biopsy (eLB)—were employed to investigate their complementary roles. Methods: Plasma and saliva samples were collected from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial of osimertinib and local ablative therapy upon progression (NCT02759835). Plasma was analyzed by ddPCR and NGS. Saliva was analyzed by eLB. Results: A total of 25 patients were included. We analyzed 534 samples by ddPCR ( n = 25), 256 samples by NGS ( n = 24) and 371 samples by eLB ( n = 22). Among 20 patients who progressed, ctDNA progression predated RECIST 1.1 progression by a median of 118 days (range: 61–272 days) in 11 (55%) patients. Of nine patients without ctDNA progression by ddPCR, two patients had an increase in mutant EGFR by eLB and two patients were found to have ctDNA progression by NGS. Levels of ctDNA measured by ddPCR and NGS at early time points, but not volumetric tumor burden, were associated with PFS. EGFR/ ERBB2/ MET/KRAS amplifications, EGFR C797S, PIK3CA E545K, PTEN V9del, and CTNNB1 S45P were key resistance mechanisms identified by NGS. Conclusion: Serial assessment of ctDNA in plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib, with each assay having supplementary roles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing

          Intratumor heterogeneity may foster tumor evolution and adaptation and hinder personalized-medicine strategies that depend on results from single tumor-biopsy samples. To examine intratumor heterogeneity, we performed exome sequencing, chromosome aberration analysis, and ploidy profiling on multiple spatially separated samples obtained from primary renal carcinomas and associated metastatic sites. We characterized the consequences of intratumor heterogeneity using immunohistochemical analysis, mutation functional analysis, and profiling of messenger RNA expression. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed branched evolutionary tumor growth, with 63 to 69% of all somatic mutations not detectable across every tumor region. Intratumor heterogeneity was observed for a mutation within an autoinhibitory domain of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase, correlating with S6 and 4EBP phosphorylation in vivo and constitutive activation of mTOR kinase activity in vitro. Mutational intratumor heterogeneity was seen for multiple tumor-suppressor genes converging on loss of function; SETD2, PTEN, and KDM5C underwent multiple distinct and spatially separated inactivating mutations within a single tumor, suggesting convergent phenotypic evolution. Gene-expression signatures of good and poor prognosis were detected in different regions of the same tumor. Allelic composition and ploidy profiling analysis revealed extensive intratumor heterogeneity, with 26 of 30 tumor samples from four tumors harboring divergent allelic-imbalance profiles and with ploidy heterogeneity in two of four tumors. Intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development. Intratumor heterogeneity, associated with heterogeneous protein function, may foster tumor adaptation and therapeutic failure through Darwinian selection. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

            Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies.

              The development of noninvasive methods to detect and monitor tumors continues to be a major challenge in oncology. We used digital polymerase chain reaction-based technologies to evaluate the ability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect tumors in 640 patients with various cancer types. We found that ctDNA was detectable in >75% of patients with advanced pancreatic, ovarian, colorectal, bladder, gastroesophageal, breast, melanoma, hepatocellular, and head and neck cancers, but in less than 50% of primary brain, renal, prostate, or thyroid cancers. In patients with localized tumors, ctDNA was detected in 73, 57, 48, and 50% of patients with colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast adenocarcinoma, respectively. ctDNA was often present in patients without detectable circulating tumor cells, suggesting that these two biomarkers are distinct entities. In a separate panel of 206 patients with metastatic colorectal cancers, we showed that the sensitivity of ctDNA for detection of clinically relevant KRAS gene mutations was 87.2% and its specificity was 99.2%. Finally, we assessed whether ctDNA could provide clues into the mechanisms underlying resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in 24 patients who objectively responded to therapy but subsequently relapsed. Twenty-three (96%) of these patients developed one or more mutations in genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Together, these data suggest that ctDNA is a broadly applicable, sensitive, and specific biomarker that can be used for a variety of clinical and research purposes in patients with multiple different types of cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                03 July 2021
                July 2021
                : 13
                : 13
                : 3342
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; cultrarc@ 123456navmed.nci.nih.gov (C.M.C.); nitin.roper@ 123456nih.gov (N.R.); elizabeth.akoth@ 123456nih.gov (E.A.); azam.ghafoor@ 123456nih.gov (A.G.); vikram.misra@ 123456nih.gov (V.M.); nmonkash@ 123456nyit.edu (N.M.)
                [2 ]Laboratory of Pathology, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; xil2@ 123456mail.nih.gov (L.X.); phamtrin@ 123456mail.nih.gov (T.H.-T.P.); mraff@ 123456mail.nih.gov (M.R.)
                [3 ]School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; fwei@ 123456dentistry.ucla.edu (F.W.); jcheng1@ 123456g.ucla.edu (J.C.); dtww@ 123456ucla.edu (D.T.W.W.)
                [4 ]Inivata, Cambridge CB21 6GS, UK; greg.jones@ 123456inivata.com (G.J.); clive.morris@ 123456inivata.com (C.M.)
                [5 ]Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; ahmad.shafiei@ 123456nih.gov (A.S.); hadi.bagheri@ 123456nih.gov (H.B.)
                [6 ]Liquid Diagnostics LLC, San Clemente, CA 92673, USA; charlesmstrom@ 123456gmail.com (C.S.); emtu@ 123456ucla.edu (M.T.)
                [7 ]EZLife Bio Inc., Los Angeles, CA 91324, USA; wei.liao@ 123456ezlife.bio
                [8 ]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; dchia@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu
                [9 ]Biostatistics and Data Management Section, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; steinbes@ 123456mail.nih.gov
                Author notes
                [†]

                Current address: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

                [‡]

                Current address: Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Lawrence Township, NJ 08648, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-7072
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-161X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-4030
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-551X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-2206
                Article
                cancers-13-03342
                10.3390/cancers13133342
                8268167
                34283064
                f08b7ab7-00f7-4ce5-904d-f9eb546a39a7
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 May 2021
                : 29 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                ctdna,egfr,osimertinib,nsclc
                ctdna, egfr, osimertinib, nsclc

                Comments

                Comment on this article