11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Locking Stand-Alone Cage Constructs for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design

          Prospective case series study.

          Purpose

          Description of the outcome of stand-alone cervical cages for single and multilevel cervical degenerative spine disease.

          Overview of Literature

          The aim of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spine disease is to improve patient symptoms and spine stability and restore lordosis. Locking stand-alone cages were developed with the goal of minimizing soft tissue disruption anterior to the vertebrae and reducing the profile of the construct by avoiding an anterior plate, thereby maximizing ACDF benefits.

          Methods

          This study comprises a case series of patients surgically treated between July 2015 and February 2018 who received single or multilevel ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone cervical cage. Surgical and clinical preoperative evaluation and surgical outcomes were evaluated using pre- and postoperative Nurick, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for myelopathy scales, cervical Cobb angles, postoperative surgical complications, and fusion and subsidence rates.

          Results

          Fifty-three patients underwent ACDF; the mean age of these patients was 58.8 years, and their preoperative VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were 8.1, 31.6, and 15.3, respectively. The preoperative Cobb angle was 30.7°. Forty-five percent of patients had one-level, 54.7% had two-level, and 13.2% had three-level procedures. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, foraminal stenosis was present in 94.3% of patients, whereas medullar stenosis was present in 41.5%. The rate of complications was 5.7%: two patients had postoperative dysphagia (3.7%), and one patient had a surgical site hematoma. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 6.7 months; postoperative VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were 2.4, 15.9, and 15.8, respectively. Postoperative Cobb angle was 35.9°, fusion rate was 84.9%, and subsidence rate was 11.3%.

          Conclusions

          ACDF with zero-profile stand-alone cervical devices is an excellent option for cervical degenerative disc disease of one, two, and three levels, with similar results reported when using ACDF with either cage or plate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.

            Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with anterior plating of the cervical spine is a well-accepted treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Recently, to minimise the extent of surgery, anterior interbody fusion with cages has become more common. While there are numerous reports on the primary stabilising effects of the different cervical cages, little is known about the subsidence behaviour of such cages in vivo. We retrospectively reviewed eight patients with cervical radiculopathy operated upon with anterior discectomy and fusion with a stand-alone titanium cervical cage. During surgery, only the cartilage portion of the end plate was removed and the cages were filled with autologous cancellous bone graft from the iliac crest. To assess possible subsidence or migration, three different radiographic measurements in the sagittal plane were taken for each case, postoperatively and at the latest follow-up. Subsidence was defined as any change in at least one of our parameters of at least 3 mm. Follow-up time was 12-18 months (average 15 months). Five of the nine fused levels had radiological signs of cage subsidence. No posterior or anterior migration was observed. However, subsidence did not correlate with clinical symptoms in four of the five patients. The remaining patient with signs of subsidence, whose neck pain and neurologic symptoms had regressed in the early postoperative course, suffered recurrence of radiculopathy 6 months after the surgery. Her symptoms were explained by the subsidence of the cage and the subsequent foraminal stenosis observed on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. At 15 months' follow-up, her cage was broken. Our preliminary results, so far limited in number, represent a serious warning to the proponents of stand-alone cervical cages
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Subsidence and Nonunion after Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage

              Background The purposes of the present study are to evaluate the subsidence and nonunion that occurred after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a stand-alone intervertebral cage and to analyze the risk factors for the complications. Methods Thirty-eight patients (47 segments) who underwent anterior cervical fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage and an autologous cancellous iliac bone graft from June 2003 to August 2008 were enrolled in this study. The anterior and posterior segmental heights and the distance from the anterior edge of the upper vertebra to the anterior margin of the cage were measured on the plain radiographs. Subsidence was defined as ≥ a 2 mm (minor) or 3 mm (major) decrease of the segmental height at the final follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period. Nonunion was evaluated according to the instability being ≥ 2 mm in the interspinous distance on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs. Results The anterior and posterior segmental heights decreased from the immediate postoperative period to the final follow-up at 1.33 ± 1.46 mm and 0.81 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. Subsidence ≥ 2 mm and 3 mm were observed in 12 segments (25.5%) and 7 segments (14.9%), respectively. Among the expected risk factors for subsidence, a smaller anteroposterior (AP) diameter (14 mm vs. 12 mm) of cages (p = 0.034; odds ratio [OR], 0.017) and larger intraoperative distraction (p = 0.041; OR, 3.988) had a significantly higher risk of subsidence. Intervertebral nonunion was observed in 7 segments (7/47, 14.9%). Compared with the union group, the nonunion group had a significantly higher ratio of two-level fusion to one-level fusions (p = 0.001). Conclusions Anterior cervical fusion using a stand-alone cage with a large AP diameter while preventing anterior intraoperative over-distraction will be helpful to prevent the subsidence of cages. Two-level cervical fusion might require more careful attention for avoiding nonunion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asian Spine J
                Asian Spine J
                ASJ
                Asian Spine Journal
                Korean Society of Spine Surgery
                1976-1902
                1976-7846
                August 2019
                10 April 2019
                : 13
                : 4
                : 630-637
                Affiliations
                Neurological Center, American British Cowdry Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
                Author notes
                Correspondence author: Jaime Jesús Martínez–Anda Neurological Center, American British Cowdry Hospital, Av. Carlos Graef Fernández 154 int. 155, Col. Tlaxala Santa Fe., Delegación Cuajimalpa de Morelos C.P. 05300 Mexico City, Mexico Tel: +52-5516617205, Fax: +52-16647199, E-mail: dr.martinezanda@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                asj-2018-0234
                10.31616/asj.2018.0234
                6680026
                30962412
                f0e49c73-71e1-4f44-ab14-dbc5fa076ac5
                Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 September 2018
                : 4 December 2018
                : 7 December 2018
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Orthopedics
                cervical spondylosis,spondylosis,compressive myelopathy
                Orthopedics
                cervical spondylosis, spondylosis, compressive myelopathy

                Comments

                Comment on this article