15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Phase Ib/II Study of Ganetespib With Doxorubicin in Advanced Solid Tumors Including Relapsed-Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15% of all lung cancers and is characterized by high response rates to cytotoxic chemotherapy and equally high rates of relapse. Many resistance mechanisms have been proposed including resistance to doxorubicin via induction of a heat shock response. Ganetespib is a novel and potent non-geldanamycin heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor. In preclinical studies, synergy between ganetespib and doxorubicin was shown. We conducted a phase Ib/II study of the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of ganetespib and doxorubicin.

          Methods

          Patients eligible for the phase Ib portion had advanced tumors that would be appropriate for doxorubicin therapy and those in the phase II portion had relapsed or refractory SCLC. All patients had an ECOG performance status, 0–1 and adequate organ function, including a cardiac ejection fraction ≥50%. Patients who received a lifetime cumulative doxorubicin dose of >150 mg/m 2 or who had symptomatic brain metastases were excluded. Patients received ganetespib on Days 1 and 8 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 on day 1 in 21-day cycles.

          Results

          Eleven patients were enrolled including nine in the phase Ib dose escalation and two in the phase II expansion. The study was terminated by the sponsor. The dose recommended for future study is ganetespib 150 mg/m 2 in combination with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m 2. The most common adverse events of the combination were grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and transaminitis. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Response rate was 25% and median duration of response was 137 days.

          Conclusion

          Ganetespib plus doxorubicin was a well-tolerated combination and there remains potential for the clinical development of Hsp90 inhibitors in SCLC.

          Clinical Trial Registration

          https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02261805, identifier NCT02261805.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The HSP90 chaperone machinery

          The heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) chaperone machinery is a key regulator of proteostasis. Recent progress has shed light on the interactions of HSP90 with its clients and co-chaperones, and on their functional implications. This opens up new avenues for the development of drugs that target HSP90, which could be valuable for the treatment of cancers and protein-misfolding diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

            For patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), further chemotherapy is routinely considered at relapse after first-line therapy. However, proof of clinical benefit has not been documented. This study randomly assigned patients with relapsed SCLC not considered as candidates for standard intravenous therapy to best supportive care (BSC) alone (n = 70) or oral topotecan (2.3 mg/m2/d, days 1 through 5, every 21 days) plus BSC (topotecan; n = 71). In the intent-to-treat population, survival (primary end point) was prolonged in the topotecan group (log-rank P = .0104). Median survival with BSC was 13.9 weeks (95% CI, 11.1 to 18.6) and with topotecan, 25.9 weeks (95% CI, 18.3 to 31.6). Statistical significance for survival was maintained in a subgroup of patients with a short treatment-free interval (< or = 60 days). Response to topotecan was 7% partial and 44% stable disease. Patients on topotecan had slower quality of life deterioration and greater symptom control. Principal toxicities with topotecan were hematological: grade 4 neutropenia, 33%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 7%; and grade 3/4 anemia, 25%. Comparing topotecan with BSC, infection grade 2 was 14% versus 12% and sepsis 4% versus 1%; other grade 3/4 events included vomiting 3% versus 0, diarrhea 6% versus 0, dyspnea 3% versus 9%, and pain 3% versus 6%. Toxic deaths occurred in four patients (6%) in the topotecan arm. All cause mortality within 30 days of random assignment was 13% on BSC and 7% on topotecan. Chemotherapy with oral topotecan is associated with prolongation of survival and quality of life benefit in patients with relapsed SCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

              Amrubicin, a third-generation anthracycline and potent topoisomerase II inhibitor, showed promising activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in phase II trials. This phase III trial compared the safety and efficacy of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for SCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/438004
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/525892
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/20317
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                12 March 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 64
                Affiliations
                [1] 1MedStar Georgetown University Hospital , Washington, DC, United States
                [2] 2Georgetown University , Washington, DC, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Italy

                Reviewed by: Antonio Rozzi, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Italy; Carlo Buonerba, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

                *Correspondence: Deepa S. Subramaniam, dss26@ 123456gunet.georgetown.edu

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2018.00064
                5858550
                29594044
                f6072441-09c7-402e-8cbb-65b05b2809f1
                Copyright © 2018 Subramaniam, Liu, Crawford, Kramer, Thompson, Wang and Giaccone.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 January 2018
                : 27 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 6, Words: 4437
                Categories
                Oncology
                Clinical Trial

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                small cell lung cancer,ganetespib,doxorubicin,hsp90 inhibition,chemotherapy resistance

                Comments

                Comment on this article