8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Discrete particle model for sheet flow sediment transport in the nearshore

      ,
      Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
      American Geophysical Union (AGU)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Experiments on a Gravity-Free Dispersion of Large Solid Spheres in a Newtonian Fluid under Shear

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Viscosity, granular‐temperature, and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic, frictional disks

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bedload transport of fine gravel observed by motion-picture photography

              Motion pictures taken at Duck Creek, a clear stream 6.5 m wide and 35 cm deep near Pinedale, Wyoming, provide detailed, quantitative information on both the modes of motion of individual bedload particles and the collective motions of large numbers of them. Bed shear stress was approximately 6 Pa (60 dynes cm −2 ), which was about twice the threshold for movement of the 4 mm median diameter fine gravel bed material; and transport was almost entirely as bedload. The displacements of individual particles occurred mainly by rolling of the majority of the particles and saltation of the smallest ones, and rarely by brief sliding of large, angular ones. Entrainment was principally by rollover of the larger particles and liftoff of the smaller ones, and infrequently by ejection caused by impacts, whereas distrainment was primarily by diminution of fluid forces in the case of rolling particles and by collisions with larger bed particles in the case of saltating ones. The displacement times averaged about 0.2−0.4 s and generally were much shorter than the intervening repose times. The collective motions of the particles were characterized by frequent, brief, localized, random sweep-transport events of very high rates of entrainment and transport, which in the aggregate transported approximately 70% of the total load moved. These events occurred 9% of the time at any particular point of the bed, lasted 1–2 s, affected areas typically 20–50 cm long by 10–20 cm wide, and involved bedload concentrations approximately 10 times greater than background. The distances travelled during displacements averaged about 15 times the particle diameter. Despite the differences in their dominant modes of movement, the 8–16 mm particles typically travelled only about 30% slower during displacement than the 2–4 mm ones, whose speeds averaged 21 cm s −1 . Particles starting from the same point not only moved intermittently downstream but also dispersed both longitudinally and transversely, with diffusivities of 4.6 and 0.26 cm 2 s −1 , respectively. The bedload transport rates measured from the films were consistent with those determined conventionally with a bedload sampler. The 2–4 mm particles were entrained 6 times faster on finer areas of the bed, where 8–16 mm particles covered 6% of the surface area, than on coarser ones, where they covered 12%, even though 2–4 and 4–8 mm particles covered practically the same percentage areas in both cases. The 4–8 and 8–16 mm particles, in contrast, were entrained at the same rates in both cases. To within the statistical uncertainty, the rates of distrainment balanced the rates of entrainment for all three sizes, and were approximately proportional to the corresponding concentrations of bedload.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
                J. Geophys. Res.
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                01480227
                September 15 2001
                September 15 2001
                : 106
                : C9
                : 19859-19868
                Article
                10.1029/2000JC000611
                f6346c60-c5d5-4900-95af-a4942ba9fd28
                © 2001

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article